Jump to content

Tony Blair on Islamic State: 'Don't rule out ground troops'


webfact

Recommended Posts

Tony Blair on Islamic State: 'Don't rule out ground troops'

LONDON: -- Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has said that sending in combat troops to fight Islamic State militants on the ground should not be ruled out.


Mr Blair said in a BBC interview: "Unless you're prepared to fight these people of the ground, you may contain them but you won't defeat them."

He said there was "no appetite for ground engagement in the West" and that local forces could take on the role.

The jihadists claim to have established a caliphate in Syria and northern Iraq.

Previously known as ISIS, the group has been condemned by the West for its brutal tactics, including on-camera beheadings.

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-29305840

bbclogo.jpg
-- BBC 2014-09-22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust that this clown fully realizes that this frenzied ISIS caliphate is a direct result of the vacuum that both he and Bush created with their invasion of Iraq and subsequent withdrawal.

The man is a narcissistic moron more suited for celebrity status than leadership.

Invaded yes, but withdrawal, if you listen to Obama, he personally instigated the withdrawal.. coffee1.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very well said. Certainly there will be ground troops needed, but why would the west need to provide those when those countries already have them? We are providing the worlds most advanced fighter jets and bombers from the air for surgical strikes, and they can perform the clean up in areas too populated for our arial attacks. We do not need to do everything just to pump up our own chests. I do not understand when we talk of how advanced the IS is with their ground troops when so many of them are American & European fighters recruited last month. Certainly Irag ground forces are trained better than these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust that this clown fully realizes that this frenzied ISIS caliphate is a direct result of the vacuum that both he and Bush created with their invasion of Iraq and subsequent withdrawal.

The man is a narcissistic moron more suited for celebrity status than leadership.

I guess the fact the ISIS was formed in 1996, before anyone had a Tony Blair or George Bush, has escaped your attention. So much for "direct results". Study, learn......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust that this clown fully realizes that this frenzied ISIS caliphate is a direct result of the vacuum that both he and Bush created with their invasion of Iraq and subsequent withdrawal.

The man is a narcissistic moron more suited for celebrity status than leadership.

I guess the fact the ISIS was formed in 1996, before anyone had a Tony Blair or George Bush, has escaped your attention. So much for "direct results". Study, learn......

Actually it was formed in 1999 but never really got going until 2004 when it fought against the occupation. Without the Iraq war it would have sunk into obscurity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one guy that would best serve the world by finding a large rock and crawling under it and die.

Blair should be on that front line. On the ground. Boots 'n all.

Yeah right. He is a muppet. He wouldn"t last 5 minutes in a 'stick up'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with him. Airstrikes are not enough to beat IS.

These days we see significant shift in the Obama's policy, it's clear what will(have to) follow.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/23/why-airstrikes-in-syria-are-just-the-beginning/

Saddam Hussein was a tyrant, but he performed the useful function of suppressing religious fanaticism. Bush and Blair failed to appreciate this so didn't have a correct exit strategy, without one intervention was a mistake. Now we have let the evil of Jihad out of its box, we will have to fight it wherever it appears. A few air strikes won't stop ethnic cleansing or genocide. Non intervention would simply compound the mistake of the original intervention.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with him. Airstrikes are not enough to beat IS.

These days we see significant shift in the Obama's policy, it's clear what will(have to) follow.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/23/why-airstrikes-in-syria-are-just-the-beginning/

Saddam Hussein was a tyrant, but he performed the useful function of suppressing religious fanaticism. Bush and Blair failed to appreciate this so didn't have a correct exit strategy, without one intervention was a mistake. Now we have let the evil of Jihad out of its box, we will have to fight it wherever it appears. A few air strikes won't stop ethnic cleansing or genocide. Non intervention would simply compound the mistake of the original intervention.

Yes Saddam ruled with an iron fist but probably a softer one than is used in Saudi Arabia and other "pro western" states. Question is this Saddam's nature or did he quickly realize the only way to keep a disunited country together is with an iron fist then develop this style? Probably a bit of both. It is so ridiculous that a country such as American that has countless states does not employ the same philosophy when it conquered Iraq. Perhaps they felt Iraq did not deserve democracy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I propose that if a man like Blair advocates ground troops, that he volunteers to put his own boots on the ground, and out his own life at risk. Same goes for Cameron, Obama, and all the other politicians that are so willing to put our youths lives at risk over something they consider to be important. If it is really important, do as the Kings in the old days did. Get out there and fight for your country. Otherwise, just shut the <deleted>** up, and try to help your people at home.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...