Commerce Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 I can understand it .. if the guy is innocent and some internet hero's destroy his image.. id be pissed too. If the guy is innocent?? Well yeah, but if he was innocent he would of submitted long ago to a DNA test. Why ? Because some people don't believe him ?. This is not trial by media. I know that I would be real wary giving off my DNA to the Thai police who knows what happens with it. If there is no real good reason for it I would certainly never give of DNA to satisfy some internet group. Who knows how convincing his real evidence was for being in BKK. The stuff you guys have not see. It is as if everyone thinks that they are entitled to all the evidence and know the same stuff as the police. I have a police friend buddy (back in my birth country) he tells me that even there what is printed in newspapers is often far from what has actually happened. I find it amusing to say the least that people think they can do an investigation from behind their computer instead of having the real facts the police is privileged too. I make no claims about this guy either way, but his reputation is toast either way. This will hunt them for a long time even if not guilty. But many farangs hate rich Thais with a vengeance because then they cant feel superior. Admit it its much nicer if some HISO is guilty instead of some lowly worker. So there is prejudice too. What exactly is ect ect? Even lowly farang workers know what etc. means. Did you never watch the $&(* and I? Yul Grinner and all that ect ect ectra? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Commerce Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. Not saying it looks right.. saying all the time I make no judgement here. I don't know the real facts that are available to the police and neither does anyone here. But based on this it does not look right, but again people are already saying DNA test wont matter samples are swapped. So how can this guy win. What I am saying whatever he does there will always be those that crucify him online his reputation is toast and stuff like this can happen to all of us. Just think of cases where foreigners are framed for sex with kids... or where wives during a divorce say that hubby touched their daughter in a bad way. If rumors are taken for fact its so easy to destroy someone so I can understand the guy not liking those sites if he is innocent. Would you jump through allt he hoops some internet guys tell you to do or they go on destroying you ? Just showing things from an other side, but I agree what i read the case stinks.. but that does not mean he is guilty and if not he has every right to go after people who destroyed his reputation. You are comparing apples with oranges! Here is an interesting question for you and extremely pertinent! Why was Nom Sod EVER suspected to be prime suspect? He was in Bangkok!!!!!!!!!, so why would the police ever connect him in the first place. Most murders are committed by people that you know. However, Nom Sod has no connection to the suspects whatsoever, so why was he suspected? If you can answer this question then you have solved the case imo Here's an interesting question too, and also pertinent; Can you prove he was in BKK at the time of the murders? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) so where are the original DNA samples taken from the victims? In Singapore? Edited October 29, 2014 by NCC1701A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLing Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Now that the DNA has been swapped, he is willing to submit to a test. And I'm going to sue whoever dared to tell the truth, farang don't understand this is Thailand and the truth is just a minor inconvieance that shouldn't be taken seriously! Exactly what they mean.. the DNA is swapped.. no proof of this statement at all but posted anyway. Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. . Well if I remember right, the 1'000'000 bath was offered if police could show his son was guilty. Anyway, which ever way he said it, it's still complete nonsense. If only those in power would do what they keep mentioning to the media, Chalerm would be without a head, Thailand would never have had any military coups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post seahorse Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 I want to ask who will responsible for the reports on social media that accused my son and my family and brought disgrace upon our family?” Woraphan said in the Bangkok Post. “When the case ends, I’ll let it be the police’s duty to take legal action against them.” Who is responsible for these reports? Is it not Pol. Lt-Gen. Panya Mamen? http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/one-tourist-murder-suspect-now-arrested-another-run/ Eighth Region Police Command commissioner Pol Lt-Gen Panya Mamen identified the first suspect as Mon. He is the brother of a village headman in Koh Tao. He was arrested after evidence which police collected were examined and proved he was involved, he said.He also said another suspect is also a son of that village headman. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceybonus Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. Not saying it looks right.. saying all the time I make no judgement here. I don't know the real facts that are available to the police and neither does anyone here. But based on this it does not look right, but again people are already saying DNA test wont matter samples are swapped. So how can this guy win. What I am saying whatever he does there will always be those that crucify him online his reputation is toast and stuff like this can happen to all of us. Just think of cases where foreigners are framed for sex with kids... or where wives during a divorce say that hubby touched their daughter in a bad way. If rumors are taken for fact its so easy to destroy someone so I can understand the guy not liking those sites if he is innocent. Would you jump through allt he hoops some internet guys tell you to do or they go on destroying you ? Just showing things from an other side, but I agree what i read the case stinks.. but that does not mean he is guilty and if not he has every right to go after people who destroyed his reputation. You are comparing apples with oranges! Here is an interesting question for you and extremely pertinent! Why was Nom Sod EVER suspected to be prime suspect? He was in Bangkok!!!!!!!!!, so why would the police ever connect him in the first place. Most murders are committed by people that you know. However, Nom Sod has no connection to the suspects whatsoever, so why was he suspected? If you can answer this question then you have solved the case imo Ummm....... you just got back from which planet again? You are missing the point massively! I think he is guilty as sin!! The devil is in the detail! Why was he suspected in the first place?? That surely gives you his motive and surely gives you the right for dna. Also it gives you an opp to dig into his alibi including timeline, phone records, flight records etc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceybonus Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. Not saying it looks right.. saying all the time I make no judgement here. I don't know the real facts that are available to the police and neither does anyone here. But based on this it does not look right, but again people are already saying DNA test wont matter samples are swapped. So how can this guy win. What I am saying whatever he does there will always be those that crucify him online his reputation is toast and stuff like this can happen to all of us. Just think of cases where foreigners are framed for sex with kids... or where wives during a divorce say that hubby touched their daughter in a bad way. If rumors are taken for fact its so easy to destroy someone so I can understand the guy not liking those sites if he is innocent. Would you jump through allt he hoops some internet guys tell you to do or they go on destroying you ? Just showing things from an other side, but I agree what i read the case stinks.. but that does not mean he is guilty and if not he has every right to go after people who destroyed his reputation. You are comparing apples with oranges! Here is an interesting question for you and extremely pertinent! Why was Nom Sod EVER suspected to be prime suspect? He was in Bangkok!!!!!!!!!, so why would the police ever connect him in the first place. Most murders are committed by people that you know. However, Nom Sod has no connection to the suspects whatsoever, so why was he suspected? If you can answer this question then you have solved the case imo Here's an interesting question too, and also pertinent; Can you prove he was in BKK at the time of the murders? read comment 37 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tazwa Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) Why doesn't the family sue the police? They're the ones who said the son had fled the island and was hiding in Bangkok! Edited October 29, 2014 by Tazwa 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commerce Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Now that the DNA has been swapped, he is willing to submit to a test. And I'm going to sue whoever dared to tell the truth, farang don't understand this is Thailand and the truth is just a minor inconvieance that shouldn't be taken seriously! Exactly what they mean.. the DNA is swapped.. no proof of this statement at all but posted anyway. Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. Not saying it looks right.. saying all the time I make no judgement here. I don't know the real facts that are available to the police and neither does anyone here. But based on this it does not look right, but again people are already saying DNA test wont matter samples are swapped. So how can this guy win. What I am saying whatever he does there will always be those that crucify him online his reputation is toast and stuff like this can happen to all of us. Just think of cases where foreigners are framed for sex with kids... or where wives during a divorce say that hubby touched their daughter in a bad way. If rumors are taken for fact its so easy to destroy someone so I can understand the guy not liking those sites if he is innocent. Would you jump through allt he hoops some internet guys tell you to do or they go on destroying you ? Just showing things from an other side, but I agree what i read the case stinks.. but that does not mean he is guilty and if not he has every right to go after people who destroyed his reputation. And referring to post #21 by yourself... "Anyway there is so much misinformation there that I stay well away from this case because I simply don't know." Seems you can't lay off. ???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxLee Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 I can understand it .. if the guy is innocent and some internet hero's destroy his image.. id be pissed too. If the guy is innocent?? Well yeah, but if he was innocent he would of submitted long ago to a DNA test. This is Thailand. There is innocent, Innocent, INNOCENT AND INNOCENT.It's just a matter of how much money it takes to make one "Innocent". Wrong.... There is influence, face, face, FACE and 1000 times FACE at stake. And social media to those ignorant bastards is like a b*****#### to them at the moment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commerce Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Now that the DNA has been swapped, he is willing to submit to a test. And I'm going to sue whoever dared to tell the truth, farang don't understand this is Thailand and the truth is just a minor inconvieance that shouldn't be taken seriously! Exactly what they mean.. the DNA is swapped.. no proof of this statement at all but posted anyway. Well: He run from the DNA testing. His father and brother weren't tested as well (you can see if a family member is the person you search for). The father was ready to pay 1.000.000 for evidence that shows that his son is not guilty. Than the police found these guys, they were beaten till confessed. Now the son comes back and is ready for a DNA test. That doesn't look right, or? That does not mean he is guilty, but it doesn't look right. . Well if I remember right, the 1'000'000 bath was offered if police could show his son was guilty. Anyway, which ever way he said it, it's still complete nonsense. If only those in power would do what they keep mentioning to the media, Chalerm would be without a head, Thailand would never have had any military coups I'd give anything for 1 million baths.... I hate having to stand in the shower everyday, so much so that I put a plastic chair in my shower to sit. Lying down aint an option, as the bathroom floods. What would the police do with 1'000'000 bath anyway? .... employ them in their brothels? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iReason Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why did he refuse up to now for his sons DNA to be taken? Is he above the law? He's Influential... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dogmatix Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 It has taken 6 weeks for this, whereas thousands of Burmese on Koh Tao had no choice and were forced to give DNA samples immediately without lawyers and press conferences. It goes without saying that the headman has total reassurances from the police that no match is possible. Note that he hasn't offered to give his son's DNA to British investigators to test in the UK. Whatever was inside the condom was apparently cleaned away leaving no DNA traces. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mcm991 Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 You are comparing apples with oranges! Here is an interesting question for you and extremely pertinent! Why was Nom Sod EVER suspected to be prime suspect? He was in Bangkok!!!!!!!!!, so why would the police ever connect him in the first place. Most murders are committed by people that you know. However, Nom Sod has no connection to the suspects whatsoever, so why was he suspected? If you can answer this question then you have solved the case imo Ummm....... you just got back from which planet again? You are missing the point massively! I think he is guilty as sin!! The devil is in the detail! Why was he suspected in the first place?? That surely gives you his motive and surely gives you the right for dna. Also it gives you an opp to dig into his alibi including timeline, phone records, flight records etc In the early days of the investigation, I believe that even the RTP were keen to solve the crime in an honest way. http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/one-tourist-murder-suspect-now-arrested-another-run/ I was not on the island and I did not have any opportunity to examine any evidence but it looked as though things were on the right track. (see link above) Then everything went south. I have no evidence to support my views..... but seems to me as though the boss man got a call from higher up in the food chain and was told to look elsewhere. So... alledged gay lovers were hatched. Taxi drivers were threatened with violence if they did not fabricate evidence. The 3rd suspect was forgotton. Everything started to smell bad and it appeared to me that a coverup was in play. Apparently, many here felt the same. And these 2 kids were fingered for the crime and everything was done and dusted. The ridiculous re-enactment at the crime scene was what confirmed for me in my mind that it was all rotton. No way those boys were involved as accused. They had no idea what was going on and had to be pushed and prodded and guided all the way. It was a farce. They may have been close by but I don't believe they were the murderers. The actual murders, especially the girl...... was exceptionally violent. Almost all of this kind of brutality has in my experience been a result of serious drug use. Only rarely do you see this kind of brutality in rage or anger without the presence of large amounts of substances involved. IMO, this crime was an act of extreme rage. I have never heard of a murder so brutal from being a bit horny after having a few beers and deciding to cop a feel. (unless the perp was a complete psychopath... which is also very unusual.) Just my observations...... but I believe shared by many on this forum. The u-turn on the rich kid forces closer inspection. I believe for good reasons. He may be squeaky clean..... but too many nagging questions that have not been answered in any convincing way. 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dean008 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 me too, but i would have provided my dna a long time ago to clear my name I can understand it .. if the guy is innocent and some internet hero's destroy his image.. id be pissed too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
changnaam Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Title of this article says it all...... Read the title again and it is obvious what is happening. Not being cryptic but innocent people do not need their father to clear their name for them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Artisi Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 I can understand it .. if the guy is innocent and some internet hero's destroy his image.. id be pissed too. If the guy is innocent?? Well yeah, but if he was innocent he would of submitted long ago to a DNA test. Why ? Because some people don't believe him ?. This is not trial by media. I know that I would be real wary giving off my DNA to the Thai police who knows what happens with it. If there is no real good reason for it I would certainly never give of DNA to satisfy some internet group. Who knows how convincing his real evidence was for being in BKK. The stuff you guys have not see. It is as if everyone thinks that they are entitled to all the evidence and know the same stuff as the police. I have a police friend buddy (back in my birth country) he tells me that even there what is printed in newspapers is often far from what has actually happened. I find it amusing to say the least that people think they can do an investigation from behind their computer instead of having the real facts the police is privileged too. I make no claims about this guy either way, but his reputation is toast either way. This will hunt them for a long time even if not guilty. But many farangs hate rich Thais with a vengeance because then they cant feel superior. Admit it its much nicer if some HISO is guilty instead of some lowly worker. So there is prejudice too. I don't think many farangs dislike / hate rich Thai's , what they dislike is dishonest thugs, dishonest politicians, dishonest police, dishonest judges, dishonest people in general -- usually for a good reason. 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 The truth is all that people wants, sadly there is no chance of the truth. The BIB clown show at the beginning, was exactly what was required to make sure that the guilty parties weren't found. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabis Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 I want to ask who will responsible for the reports on social media that accused my son and my family and brought disgrace upon our family?” Woraphan said in the Bangkok Post. “When the case ends, I’ll let it be the police’s duty to take legal action against them.” Who is responsible for these reports? Is it not Pol. Lt-Gen. Panya Mamen? http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/one-tourist-murder-suspect-now-arrested-another-run/ Eighth Region Police Command commissioner Pol Lt-Gen Panya Mamen identified the first suspect as Mon. He is the brother of a village headman in Koh Tao. He was arrested after evidence which police collected were examined and proved he was involved, he said.He also said another suspect is also a son of that village headman. Would be interesting to see how that would pan out. This train of thought, for me, came to a thaiboxing match - where in the blue shorts we have the Assistant Director-General of RTP and in green shorts the Turtle Island (ex-)Kamnan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnThailandJohn Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retsdon Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 The truth is all that people wants, sadly there is no chance of the truth. The BIB clown show at the beginning, was exactly what was required to make sure that the guilty parties weren't found. I wouldn't be quite so pessimistic just yet. At this point we have absolutely no idea of what cards the British police might have in their hand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Artisi Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why is he giving DNA, because he has been advised to by so by the friendly BIB - why, because if Hanna was raped or had consensual sex it is very possible he wasn't involved in the actual act and this is understood by the friendly BIB and they have advised this course of action - this will clear him in this regard, however if she wasn't raped or didn't have consensual sex he has nothing to hide - this of course only clears him with regard to engaging in any act of sex with the girl. As for anything else connected with her brutal murder, well that's a completely different ball game and open to all sorts of ideas / findings / outcomes. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokemachine Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 “I want to ask who will responsible for the reports on social media that accused my son and my family and brought disgrace upon our family?” Woraphan said in the Bangkok Post. “When the case ends, I’ll let it be the police’s duty to take legal action against them.” What disgrace will there be if your son has volunteer for DNA matching to prove his innocence in the first place? Talking about the DNA, for God sake please don't sacrifice some of the innocent lives. Remember one thing- Karma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post retsdon Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnThailandJohn Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? Why don't know for sure, so I guess that is a good reason to believe it has something to do with DNA? What we do know is clearly a judge, prosecutors and police believe their is enough evidence and they they are still in jail. We also know this case was rushed to get to the prosecutors and get reports released (because of conspiracy nuts) and even in the west this would be an incredibly quick time to get everything completely properly in presenting the case to prosecutors. But yea, must be because the DNA doesn't match. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Artisi Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? The match must be certain, JHJ has said so and he knows all - just ask, he isn't shy in telling you. The only problem is that JHJ and a few others who are always sprouting "conspiracy" are in fact the the real conspiracy nuts - lets promote the conspiracy to set-up a couple of Burmese guys with a few bullsh1t stories, false info. lies, misinformation - we have nothing to do all day so we can spend all our time promoting the conspiracy to the non-believers - just think of the jollies we can get from it. Edited October 29, 2014 by Artisi 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabis Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? Why don't know for sure, so I guess that is a good reason to believe it has something to do with DNA? What we do know is clearly a judge, prosecutors and police believe their is enough evidence and they they are still in jail. We also know this case was rushed to get to the prosecutors and get reports released (because of conspiracy nuts) and even in the west this would be an incredibly quick time to get everything completely properly in presenting the case to prosecutors. But yea, must be because the DNA doesn't match. In fact what we know, is that there is some evidence to hold them, and basically them being illegal immigrants is sufficit - they will be prosecuted with that propably, even if no charges would be brought up regarding this case. The obvious secondary reason for detaining, of course, is to keep them from leaving the country(read: be deported back to Myanmar). I think the legal limit is 80 and some days, until they either have to prosecute or drop the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mcm991 Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? Why don't know for sure, so I guess that is a good reason to believe it has something to do with DNA? What we do know is clearly a judge, prosecutors and police believe their is enough evidence and they they are still in jail. We also know this case was rushed to get to the prosecutors and get reports released (because of conspiracy nuts) and even in the west this would be an incredibly quick time to get everything completely properly in presenting the case to prosecutors. But yea, must be because the DNA doesn't match. My gut feeling is (without any evidence to back me up) is that these boys cleared the DNA test on the first round .... because there were no perfect matches. Lots of results were on the same desk and nothing was perfect ....... so everybody was clear. Then for whatever reason... honest or otherwise, these 2 came back on the radar and their DNA test was looked at again ...... and it was a bit 'on the fence'. DNA can be quite tricky ... many people think it is completely black and white. Not so. So, it was decided in retrospect that it was actually a positive and they are toast. But in reality........ in court it would be tricky to convince a judge without reasonable doubt (especially with a robust defence) and so it was sent back yet again for more meat. Just my theory........ because I know how much you enjoy my theories JTJ....... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expat Girl Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? Why don't know for sure, so I guess that is a good reason to believe it has something to do with DNA? What we do know is clearly a judge, prosecutors and police believe their is enough evidence and they they are still in jail. We also know this case was rushed to get to the prosecutors and get reports released (because of conspiracy nuts) and even in the west this would be an incredibly quick time to get everything completely properly in presenting the case to prosecutors. But yea, must be because the DNA doesn't match. Read the media reports before posting, your comments contradict your intial thoughts on this event, please do not jump from one goal post to another, very poor. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gunna Posted October 29, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2014 Why does it matter? Conspiracy nuts will just not believe and demand more proof only to then go on and disbelieve that. . What kind of results are these people thinking will happen ... that somehow the two DNA samples collected at the scene will somehow match a third person making two people who don't even share the same heritage having identical DNA. THEY ALREADY MATCHED THE DNA and this kid was not even on the island at the time of the murders. At least their is tough defamation laws in Thailand and this is a perfect example of when they should be used. If the matches are so certain, why has the prosecutor sent the docket back THREE times? I think the only DNA match is between the cigarette butts on the beach and the 2 Myanmar guys, and they have already admitted they were on the beach. This is why the prosecutor keeps asking for more evidence - I have never read that they have a match between the Myanmar and from inside Hannah . Big man will have paid the local police to make sure that any DNA that is tested isn't actually from the son. There is no point in the Myanmar guys denying it if they did it, because they would know that their DNA was inside Hannah. Only the son of the big boss would rape and expect to get away with it. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts