Popular Post ggold Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Ironically, I think ISIS will herald the end of Islamic extremism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31123786 "Today we stand shoulder to shoulder with the family of the martyr hero Moaz, with our people and our armed forces in this tragedy," he added. "At these difficult times it is every Jordanian's duty to stand together in the face of crises and ordeals, which will only make us stronger." - King Abdullah of Jordan. I wonder for how long that will be. LIke most Arabs they talk the talk, but can't fight the fight! It would be nice to thing that maybe at last the Arab world is going to pick up arms against IS. But when I read the UAE stopped bombing raids because of the Jordanian pilots capture. I knew this would never happen. Seriously what should happen is, they should build a big wall around all the arab countries and leave them to it. With a warning <deleted> with us and we will end you for good. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F430murci Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Ironically, I think ISIS will herald the end of Islamic extremism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31123786 "Today we stand shoulder to shoulder with the family of the martyr hero Moaz, with our people and our armed forces in this tragedy," he added. "At these difficult times it is every Jordanian's duty to stand together in the face of crises and ordeals, which will only make us stronger." - King Abdullah of Jordan. Well, so far seems it managed to drive away one coalition member United Arab Emirates, Key U.S. Ally in ISIS Effort, Disengaged in December WASHINGTON The United Arab Emirates, a crucial Arab ally in the American-led coalition against the Islamic State, suspended airstrikes against the Sunni extremist group in December, citing fears for its pilots safety after a Jordanian pilot was captured and who the extremists said had been burned to death, United States officials said Tuesday. The United Arab Emirates are demanding that the Pentagon improve its search-and-rescue efforts, including the use of V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, in northern Iraq, closer to the battleground, instead of basing the missions in Kuwait, administration officials said. The countrys pilots will not rejoin the fight until the Ospreys, which take off and land like helicopters but fly like planes, are put in place in northern Iraq. The United Arab Emirates notified the United States Central Command that they were suspending flights, administration officials said, after First Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh of the Jordanian Air Force was captured when his plane went down near Raqqa, Syria. A senior American military official said Islamic State militants grabbed Lieutenant Kasasbeh within just a few minutes. He added, There was no time for us to engage." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/world/middleeast/united-arab-emirates-key-us-ally-in-isis-effort-disengaged-in-december.html UAE are a bunch of Ps. No surprise there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Burning someone alive is barbaric, bombing people while you are in a plane is too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Ironically, I think ISIS will herald the end of Islamic extremism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31123786 "Today we stand shoulder to shoulder with the family of the martyr hero Moaz, with our people and our armed forces in this tragedy," he added. "At these difficult times it is every Jordanian's duty to stand together in the face of crises and ordeals, which will only make us stronger." - King Abdullah of Jordan. Well, so far seems it managed to drive away one coalition member United Arab Emirates, Key U.S. Ally in ISIS Effort, Disengaged in December WASHINGTON The United Arab Emirates, a crucial Arab ally in the American-led coalition against the Islamic State, suspended airstrikes against the Sunni extremist group in December, citing fears for its pilots safety after a Jordanian pilot was captured and who the extremists said had been burned to death, United States officials said Tuesday. The United Arab Emirates are demanding that the Pentagon improve its search-and-rescue efforts, including the use of V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, in northern Iraq, closer to the battleground, instead of basing the missions in Kuwait, administration officials said. The countrys pilots will not rejoin the fight until the Ospreys, which take off and land like helicopters but fly like planes, are put in place in northern Iraq. The United Arab Emirates notified the United States Central Command that they were suspending flights, administration officials said, after First Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh of the Jordanian Air Force was captured when his plane went down near Raqqa, Syria. A senior American military official said Islamic State militants grabbed Lieutenant Kasasbeh within just a few minutes. He added, There was no time for us to engage." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/world/middleeast/united-arab-emirates-key-us-ally-in-isis-effort-disengaged-in-december.html UAE are a bunch of Ps. No surprise there. I wouldn't name-call UAE pilots for being cautious. Granted, it's a war, but there are humans on the line. It will be even bigger news if/when an American or European pilot gets caught. Here's an idea for a trap: Arrange for a dummy jet (an older model fighter, perhaps) to get shot down. Arrange for a dummy to parachute down. gangs of baddies will converge on the scene. Blow 'em all away. I had a similar trap idea, in the Iraqi or Afghan war. Have an armored troop carrier, remote operated, but with a dummy at the wheel to make it look realistic. Have it veer in to a hornets nest of baddies, as if it took a series of wrong turns. Have it stall. Bad guys will converge on it. Kaboom! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thongkorn Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 This mans death is the worst thing i have seen, These animals where talking and singing, trying to justify what they where doing to a living person. How can God be great when he allows this despicable thing to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F430murci Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Ironically, I think ISIS will herald the end of Islamic extremism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31123786 "Today we stand shoulder to shoulder with the family of the martyr hero Moaz, with our people and our armed forces in this tragedy," he added. "At these difficult times it is every Jordanian's duty to stand together in the face of crises and ordeals, which will only make us stronger." - King Abdullah of Jordan. Well, so far seems it managed to drive away one coalition member United Arab Emirates, Key U.S. Ally in ISIS Effort, Disengaged in DecemberWASHINGTON The United Arab Emirates, a crucial Arab ally in the American-led coalition against the Islamic State, suspended airstrikes against the Sunni extremist group in December, citing fears for its pilots safety after a Jordanian pilot was captured and who the extremists said had been burned to death, United States officials said Tuesday. The United Arab Emirates are demanding that the Pentagon improve its search-and-rescue efforts, including the use of V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft, in northern Iraq, closer to the battleground, instead of basing the missions in Kuwait, administration officials said. The countrys pilots will not rejoin the fight until the Ospreys, which take off and land like helicopters but fly like planes, are put in place in northern Iraq. The United Arab Emirates notified the United States Central Command that they were suspending flights, administration officials said, after First Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh of the Jordanian Air Force was captured when his plane went down near Raqqa, Syria. A senior American military official said Islamic State militants grabbed Lieutenant Kasasbeh within just a few minutes. He added, There was no time for us to engage." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/world/middleeast/united-arab-emirates-key-us-ally-in-isis-effort-disengaged-in-december.html UAE are a bunch of Ps. No surprise there. I wouldn't name-call UAE pilots for being cautious. Granted, it's a war, but there are humans on the line. It will be even bigger news if/when an American or European pilot gets caught.Here's an idea for a trap: Arrange for a dummy jet (an older model fighter, perhaps) to get shot down. Arrange for a dummy to parachute down. gangs of baddies will converge on the scene. Blow 'em all away. I had a similar trap idea, in the Iraqi or Afghan war. Have an armored troop carrier, remote operated, but with a dummy at the wheel to make it look realistic. Have it veer in to a hornets nest of baddies, as if it took a series of wrong turns. Have it stall. Bad guys will converge on it. Kaboom! Not naming calling pilots per se. I am name calling the culture in general, especially as it relates to the treatment of women, migrant workers and foreigners in general that are viewed offensive. Very thin skinned, selfish . . . I'll just stop there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyesWideOpen Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 From the brilliant cartoonist Stephff in Bangkok... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarky66 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. Edited February 5, 2015 by snarky66 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F430murci Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 From the brilliant cartoonist Stephff in Bangkok... So your point is, US citizens condemning or offended by burning the poor guy alive are bad in of themselves. Accepting that proposition as true, which it is not, you are basically saying that ISIS are so bad they actually offend the devil. We cannot even put our worst of the worse to death through lethal injunctions without worrying and being offended that the muderous bastaards are a little uncomfortable during the process. I would say that we are on a come rely different moral plane than ISIS who executes innocent people in the most brutal and painful ways possible. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NeverSure Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) It's actually long been my fear that this is the case. However, I suspect ISIS will cause Islam to reconsider the way it values human life, the rights of women and children. Other than that we always have nuclear weapons. No, my friend. No nukes will help the West. Paris, London, Berlin, New-York, Moscow, Jerusalem can not nuke Muslims in their midst. This is the main point! Is it so difficult to understand? Besides, where did you get the idea that Islam values human life? As long as their faith is advanced - they do not care how many lives it will cost on both sides. The West is doomed! You have just confirmed my point! You are mentioning nukes, without hesitation - but the idea of simply sending them back is more abhorrent to you and your Leaders! The West is doomed. It doomed itself by its own ideology. Have a quick and easy trip to Hell. No, the world isn't doomed. The West in its entirety isn't doomed. Europe is doomed. The Emperor of Japan is purported to have said that the reason he never considered invading the US was because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass. Whether he said it I don't know, but it would have been true. For all the criticism we get, my neighbors wouldn't put up with this crap. My neighborhood is safe and is surrounded by thousands of miles of other neighborhoods they couldn't get through. People from other countries don't understand this, but 100 million armed Americans aren't going quietly. End of. Edited February 5, 2015 by NeverSure 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post snarky66 Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 What kind of bothers me about all this stuff is the way Obama reacts. He seems disinterested, detached vapid vacuous. He might as well be talking about sports scores. The US needs a leader right now. I wonder where we'll find him? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GentlemanJim Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The video is simply horrific, and ISIS look extremely well resourced! This needs a swift and ruthless response. these animals deserve no place in any form of society. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverdie Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 It's actually long been my fear that this is the case. However, I suspect ISIS will cause Islam to reconsider the way it values human life, the rights of women and children. Other than that we always have nuclear weapons. No, my friend. No nukes will help the West. Paris, London, Berlin, New-York, Moscow, Jerusalem can not nuke Muslims in their midst. This is the main point! Is it so difficult to understand? Besides, where did you get the idea that Islam values human life? As long as their faith is advanced - they do not care how many lives it will cost on both sides. The West is doomed! You have just confirmed my point! You are mentioning nukes, without hesitation - but the idea of simply sending them back is more abhorrent to you and your Leaders! The West is doomed. It doomed itself by its own ideology. Have a quick and easy trip to Hell. No, the world isn't doomed. The West in its entirety isn't doomed. Europe is doomed. The Emperor of Japan is purported to have said that the reason he never considered invading the US was because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass. Whether he said it I don't know, but it would have been true. For all the criticism we get, my neighbors wouldn't put up with this crap. My neighborhood is safe and is surrounded by thousands of miles of other neighborhoods they couldn't get through. People from other countries don't understand this, but 100 million armed Americans aren't going quietly. End of. The Americans have their own type of home grown terrorism where there's daily mass shootings and murders at shopping malls and schools etc, where anyone that gets cranky can have access to a firearm and kill. Whilst it might not be in the name of Allah the results are similar...ie: dead innocent people. Islamic extremists can concentrate their attention elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonfly94 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The Americans have their own type of home grown terrorism where there's daily mass shootings and murders at shopping malls and schools etc, Not terrorism and nor daily, but quite rarely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverdie Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 The Americans have their own type of home grown terrorism where there's daily mass shootings and murders at shopping malls and schools etc, Not terrorism and nor daily, but quite rarely. Rarely ? Cleary DF you are not familiar with the definition of 'Rarely' but it would seem you are familiar with the state of delusion . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bkkjames Posted February 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 6, 2015 Would Be interested in getting our resident apologist's views on this story and IS in general. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai Dee Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 One off-topic post and subsequent replies have been removed from this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Ironically, I think ISIS will herald the end of Islamic extremism. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-31123786 "Today we stand shoulder to shoulder with the family of the martyr hero Moaz, with our people and our armed forces in this tragedy," he added. "At these difficult times it is every Jordanian's duty to stand together in the face of crises and ordeals, which will only make us stronger." - King Abdullah of Jordan. If you believe that then you're sorely mistaken. ISIS will never be gone nor defeated. Unlike any terror organization before, they actually possess land now. All this talk from Jordan means nothing as UAE have already ceased air strikes because of this latest atrocity, other Arab states will soon cease fire too, watch and see. Normal Arabs haven't got the bottle for this kind of confrontation. Hardly the first instance of a terrorist organization "actually possess land". I guess Hamas would qualify (although UN has taken them off of their list now), maybe Khmer rouge?I don't know of a terror organisation that has just gone and taken land from a country (two countries in this case) declared it as theirs, made them selves a capital city, traded in oil and just carried on. But feel free to enlighten me There's a binding and comprehensive list of terrorist organizations agreed upon by the UNGA? Or perhaps you're confusing the EU terrorism list thing? (and no, Hamas was not really taken off the list). Could cite Hezbollah (and previously in southern Lebanon, Fatah) as candidates, Boko Haram springs to mind as well.Taliban could possibly be mentioned (albeit it seems that they are now insurgents). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 It's actually long been my fear that this is the case. However, I suspect ISIS will cause Islam to reconsider the way it values human life, the rights of women and children. Other than that we always have nuclear weapons. No, my friend. No nukes will help the West. Paris, London, Berlin, New-York, Moscow, Jerusalem can not nuke Muslims in their midst. This is the main point! Is it so difficult to understand? Besides, where did you get the idea that Islam values human life? As long as their faith is advanced - they do not care how many lives it will cost on both sides. The West is doomed! You have just confirmed my point! You are mentioning nukes, without hesitation - but the idea of simply sending them back is more abhorrent to you and your Leaders! The West is doomed. It doomed itself by its own ideology. Have a quick and easy trip to Hell. No, the world isn't doomed. The West in its entirety isn't doomed. Europe is doomed. The Emperor of Japan is purported to have said that the reason he never considered invading the US was because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass. Whether he said it I don't know, but it would have been true. For all the criticism we get, my neighbors wouldn't put up with this crap. My neighborhood is safe and is surrounded by thousands of miles of other neighborhoods they couldn't get through. People from other countries don't understand this, but 100 million armed Americans aren't going quietly. End of. Not the Emperor, but Isoroku Yamamoto, and a misquote at that (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Isoroku_Yamamoto). Far as I am aware, those big big ideas about how the USA population en masse will face a hypothetical invasion is not something which was actually put to the test. There are countries out there with larger Muslim minorities than any EU member and they do not seem to be crumbling down as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seastallion Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. You're right, and it's a reasonable view. The US does, however, have many fingers in many pies, and interests, in the region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Burning someone alive is barbaric, bombing people while you are in a plane is too. Yeah, the thing is at some point one runs out of other cheeks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. You're right, and it's a reasonable view. The US does, however, have many fingers in many pies, and interests, in the region. So do China, Russia, the EU and those countries actually constituting the Middle East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Steely Dan Posted February 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. The surrounding Muslim Countries may be just acting as they usually do when it comes to taking responsibility for their own situation. There is however a possibility they fear a good proportion of their own populations support ISIS, in which case there is a danger elements of their military may defect. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seastallion Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. You're right, and it's a reasonable view. The US does, however, have many fingers in many pies, and interests, in the region. So do China, Russia, the EU and those countries actually constituting the Middle East. Fair enough...I guess that's why they are all consulting in the ISIS issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. You're right, and it's a reasonable view. The US does, however, have many fingers in many pies, and interests, in the region. So do China, Russia, the EU and those countries actually constituting the Middle East. Fair enough...I guess that's why they are all consulting in the ISIS issue. Yet to see any Chinese or Russian support for operations. Considering this is happening in their back yard, contribution by most relevant Middle Eastern countries is meager. The lion's share of the effort is still borne by the USA (and to a lesser degree, other Western countries). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hansgruber Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 From a religion that condones pedophilia and beastiality, is it any surprise that they can mistreat humans this way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mopar71 Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 There is only one country that can lead the fight against these barbarians, build a coalition and put 30,000 US troops in there to wipe out this scourge. Unfortunately liberals are currently running the united states and they have no stomach for any kind of fight. They are cowards and we are deeply ashamed of them. The surrounding Muslim countries got the troops, the equipment and the money to take care of things if they were really into it. Placing US troops on the ground will not assure a swift victory, nor the appreciation of relevant countries in the aftermath. The surrounding Muslim Countries may be just acting as they usually do when it comes to taking responsibility for their own situation. There is however a possibility they fear a good proportion of their own populations support ISIS, in which case there is a danger elements of their military may defect. Defect...or drop their weapons and run away like the Iraqis did. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir charles IV Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Wasn't creation of IS meant to division among the Arabs/Muslims so they kill each other and not us? It seems to be working albeit slowly. Let them fight each other over there so we can live in peace over here[emoji51] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwyn Posted February 6, 2015 Share Posted February 6, 2015 Morch "There's a binding and comprehensive list of terrorist organizations agreed upon by the UNGA? Or perhaps you're confusing the EU terrorism list thing? (and no, Hamas was not really taken off the list). Could cite Hezbollah (and previously in southern Lebanon, Fatah) as candidates, Boko Haram springs to mind as well.Taliban could possibly be mentioned (albeit it seems that they are now insurgents)." Sorry, you're wrong on just about every count in your comment. The EU has taken Hamas off of their terrorist list http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30511569 I was talking about EU, not America, Japan nor the UN who still (thankfully) accept Hamas for what it is is, a terror group! Hezbollah have not seized land in Lebanon, they're from Lebanon, formed from the old Shia block within the Lebanese society. Boko Haram, again they have not seized any land and formed their own cities etc, they're from Nigeria and based in Nigeria although they do go and kill and kidnap in Chad and of course just a couple of weeks ago, Cameroon. Fatah? They're a policital party based in Ramalah!! Founded by Arafat in the 50's as a political movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now