2 average guys ..... all other things being equal.

Which guy gets more play?The baldy? or the guy with decent hair?

Answer: The one with the fattest wallet.

.........and that`s a fact jack

2 average guys ..... all other things being equal.

Which guy gets more play?The baldy? or the guy with decent hair?

Answer: The one with the fattest wallet.

.........and that`s a fact jack

not when your me though

2 average guys ..... all other things being equal.

Which guy gets more play?The baldy? or the guy with decent hair?

Answer: The one with the fattest wallet.

.........and that`s a fact jack

not when your me though

....always an odd exception Donz

Ditto. It's great to see there are plenty of confident bald folks around here.... but who are we kidding here? If all things are equal, which would 'most' (and just because there are millions of women out there who aren't as close minded in regards to physical attractiveness as most guys are; IMO this isn't enough to buck the trend) gals choose? The confident, well to do, well spoken guy with or without hair?

hello heng,

well you have thrown a swerve ball at the girls as women are not prejudiced when it comes to men i dont think ?

they might have there perfect match scenario, but in my experience, if your a good guy with a reasonable looking noggin smooth or other wise, you should have no prob pulling a stunner.

now if you got a noggin thats full of scars, dents , and other general wounds, you are not within coo wee cobber.

cheers all friends

ps you are quite correct when you said you would beva nutter if you shaved your head when you had a top

Ditto. It's great to see there are plenty of confident bald folks around here.... but who are we kidding here? If all things are equal, which would 'most' (and just because there are millions of women out there who aren't as close minded in regards to physical attractiveness as most guys are; IMO this isn't enough to buck the trend) gals choose? The confident, well to do, well spoken guy with or without hair?

hello heng,

well you have thrown a swerve ball at the girls as women are not prejudiced when it comes to men i dont think ?

they might have there perfect match scenario, but in my experience, if your a good guy with a reasonable looking noggin smooth or other wise, you should have no prob pulling a stunner.

hola Terry,

I didn't say gals weren't prejudiced... I said there are likely less (in sheer numbers) that hold physical attractiveness as the defacto deciding factor (which in contrast to a 'likely' majority of men who use it as the primary deciding factor... as per your example of reference to "stunners") in mate selection, although surely many do.

I didn't say bald folks have a problem, in fact I said they had a pool of millions (IMO) to choose from. But my point was that that was in contrast to folks with a full head of hair who possibly/probably have a several hundred million margin added to the field.

So yes, I agree, no problem whatsoever on a case by case basis. But in the long run, I think the trends would prove that it is a disadvantage (and I'm not saying inferior.... more like comparing baldness to say being an amputee, or having a stutter, or something like that.... yes, there are just as many that will say that none of those things should hold you back either, which is a great and positive attitude!) if we were to put it all on a bell curve.

Edited August 28, 200619 yr by Heng

Ditto. It's great to see there are plenty of confident bald folks around here.... but who are we kidding here? If all things are equal, which would 'most' (and just because there are millions of women out there who aren't as close minded in regards to physical attractiveness as most guys are; IMO this isn't enough to buck the trend) gals choose? The confident, well to do, well spoken guy with or without hair?

hello heng,

well you have thrown a swerve ball at the girls as women are not prejudiced when it comes to men i dont think ?

they might have there perfect match scenario, but in my experience, if your a good guy with a reasonable looking noggin smooth or other wise, you should have no prob pulling a stunner.

hola Terry,

I didn't say gals weren't prejudiced... I said there are likely less (in sheer numbers) that hold physical attractiveness as the defacto deciding factor (which in contrast to a 'likely' majority of men who use it as the primary deciding factor... as per your example of reference to "stunners") in mate selection, although surely many do.

I didn't say bald folks have a problem, in fact I said they had a pool of millions (IMO) to choose from. But my point was that that was in contrast to folks with a full head of hair who possibly/probably have a several hundred million margin added to the field.

So yes, I agree, no problem whatsoever on a case by case basis. But in the long run, I think the trends would prove that it is a disadvantage (and I'm not saying inferior.... more like comparing baldness to say being an amputee, or having a stutter, or something like that.... yes, there are just as many that will say that none of those things should hold you back either, which is a great and positive attitude!) if we were to put it all on a bell curve.

cricky's heng,

you got a top point there, and i salute you for your cracking bit of bleeding common sense.

any way i got a brain ache from decifering that lot and im taking my hair piece off and having a nice drink .

cheers fella

Look at my avatar not only am I now bald I have got no ears.

Look at my avatar not only am I now bald I have got no ears.

yes my friend,

but have you got old chop chop's lovely looking women ?

he had no ears but he pulled the stunners.

nice one to old chop chop.

i salute him.

when younger a afew of the boys used the wash and gone shampoo, and used to be a bit concerned

but these days nobody really cares, and rightly so.

i've still got more hair than skin but if it changes i'll have to buy a realistic looking rug and hope it doesn't fly orf

we've all seen some crackers in our time, i'm sure