Jump to content








Thai Army chief says amendment just to modernise military courts


webfact

Recommended Posts

Army chief says amendment just to modernise military courts
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- Army Chief General Udomdej Sitabutr yesterday reassured the public that the amendment to the jurisdiction of the military courts aimed only to modernise military legal procedures and it would not lead to basic human rights being violated.

The National Assembly Legislative Assembly passed the first reading of the amendment, which Human Rights Watch warned would give too much power to the military courts.

The amendment would authorise the military to detain civilians for up to 84 days compared to the current seven days.

Currently, however, the seven-day detention period can be reapplied for a period of up to 90 days.

Brad Adams, Asia director of Human Rights Watch, said the government was trying to give the military unchecked authority to detain civilians.

He said Thai lawmakers should reject this military power grab that would put all citizens at risk of prolonged detention without charge.

But Udomdej, who is also Deputy Defence Minister, said the increased power would be directed only at soldiers.

The amendment also adds more jurisdiction detail clarity, said Udomdej, adding that there was a necessity to amend several Army regulations since some dated back to 1947.

He said he hoped Human Right Watch better understood the issue after receiving an Army explanation.

Meanwhile, he said the arrest of anti-coup movement members on Saturday was in accordance with the law.

"There had already been warnings calling for those people to halt any activity that would breach the law," he said, adding that several forums had been established for the public to air opinions.

The National Legislative Assembly will examine the proposed amendment on Thursday.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Army-chief-says-amendment-just-to-modernise-milita-30254234.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-02-17

Link to comment
Share on other sites


When real, true, human rights activists, like the people from Amnesty International for instance, take up a case, it can make a difference, worldwide, but when instead disguised businesses (ab-)using human rights as the product they market to generate profit out of, à la 'Human Rights Watch', employing trained agitators they call 'experts', like a Brad Adams, to blow up any, every, little thing they can out of proportion, it rather, sadly, has an adverse effect on the good cause...

I still don't understand why the Thai authorithies have never put a minimum of time and energy in exposing the truth about HRW, how it was born (...a 'special' American 'organisation'?), who were/are its main sponsors (is G. Soros a maecenas f.i.?), who have been/are leading the structure (why some idealists were chased away), what is done with the money they get (the books are quite 'creative'), who is getting paid how much (salary + 'expenses' a.s.o...), it could light the fuse to a powder keg able to blow these parasites to the moon, and open up the slavish media for the many really dramatic human rights issues, to be brought by human rights' unpaid/voluntary contributors who are now more at risk, as an additional adverse factor, because of all the space grabbed by HRW, as they are forced to stay in the dangerous shade, not being able to get the (little) protection bright media exposure is nowadays granting...! And re-direct large funds many a mistaken government is at the time pouring into this fake NGO instead of subsidising real good causes (one example of how money is wasted to HRW I could give, in my home country alas, but too long to describe here, is for crying out loud)!

Edited by bangrak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He said he hoped Human Right Watch better understood the issue after receiving an Army explanation"

HRW needs to understand that the Thai military:

- can be trusted, never to deceive or lie

- has always respected the Thai constitution(s)

- respects the election of government officials

- respects the civil liberties and rights of the Thai people

- accepts legal accountability for all its actions

How many times does the Chief of NCPO General Prayuth must tell people that he will not abuse his self-granted absolute power over the Thais people? Howmany times must he plead that he is not a dictator and cannot just order people around.

Yes, I do hope the HRW does understand what is happening in Thailand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...