Top commerce officials fired for fake G2G rice deal with China



BANGKOK: -- The subcommittee of the Civil Service Commission has resolved to dismiss two senior commerce officials involved with the fake G2G rice sale with China with reason it caused severest damages to the country.

It also resolved to halt pension payment not to a retired senior commerce official who helped to facilitate the fake deal.

Minister of Commerce General Chatchai Sarikalya revealed that the subcommittee of the Civil Service Commission has approved during its meeting earlier today, the immediate firing of two commerce officials, Tikhamporn Nataworntat, deputy director-general of the Internal Trade Department and Akkarapong Teepwatchara, former director-general of the Foreign Rice Trade Office, for the serious offences.

He said at the same time the subcommittee also resolved to stop paying pension indefinitely to the former director-general of the Department of Foreign Trade, Manas Soiploy, for the same serious offences.

According to minister, the three persons were allegedly involved in assisting the unauthorized Chinese private sector in getting the G2G rice deal through fraudulent channel.

The move has caused tremendous damages to the country.

The minister said the three persons could appeal for their case within 30 days.

Their cases would be later forwarded to the Civil and Criminal courts accordingly.

The ministry would also file damage suit to demand compensation from them for the huge loss, he added.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/top-commerce-officials-fired-for-fake-g2g-rice-deal-with-china


-- Thai PBS 2015-03-13

Ah, at last a good news story.

And people further up the chain? These guys didn't do it from their own initiative.

I hope they get to appeal their dismissal from a nice jail cell. Of course, when the criminal trial is over, they probably won't have much case for being reinstated.

Start confiscating their wealth as its been stolen from the people.

Headline says they've been fired but body of story says the subcommittee has resolved to fire them. Let's hope they're not connected etc to the extent someone ' unresolves ' the decision.

Criminally charge them ... then trie them ... then imprison them.

And people further up the chain? These guys didn't do it from their own initiative.

Isn't Yingluck supposedly further up the chain? (by title anyway) and the commerce Minister - they haven't exactly got off scot free have they!!

And people further up the chain? These guys didn't do it from their own initiative.

No they probably didn't on their own initiative, but they were involved and that was their decision.

It is good to see the wheelturning slowly sorting out the crooks in these positions - trust it is kept-up for the benefit of all.

Fire them? They shouid be charged and remanded in jail !!

And people further up the chain? These guys didn't do it from their own initiative.

The people farther up the chain are already being dealt with :

-ohttp://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/800984-boonsongs-case-filesn-fake-g-to-g-deals-received-by-the-oag/

BANGKOK: -- The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) on Monday delivered the case files on fake government-to-government rice deals implicating former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyaphirom and 20 other associates to the Office of Attorney-General for consideration.

NACC assistant secretary-general Sakchai Methineephisarnkul said that the case files are made up of altogether 204,000 pages of documents contained in 59 crates which was handed over to Mr Wanchai Rujanawong, spokesman of the OAG and director of Public Prosecution Department, and Mr Chutichai Sakhakorn, director-general of the Office of Special Cases.

They are now sweeping up the crumbs and disposing of them.

You know doubt have heard about the one at the top of the heap..... Well one down from the top.

PLEASE appeal ... would like to know more about your dealings. Finally ... accountability. There should be consequences for liars and cheats especially when it affects the country's citizens.

"unauthorized Chinese private sector in getting the G2G rice deal through fraudulent channel."

Interesting that there is no further details on the Chinese side of the conspiracy. There is no mention of any evidence provided by the Chinese government or even indication of a Chinese investigation. How exactly can an "unauthorized Chinese private sector" exist without approval of the Chinese government in an alleged public government-to-government transaction?

I suspect the guilty may have some yet undiclosed insider information concerning higher government officials in both governments that could be used to barter lessor penalties.

I have to ask. If it was fraudulent in selling to private firms instead of the Chinese government, what money was collected, and how does a government get a better rate per tonne than the private sector? One price for governments and another for everyone else? It's like the ultimate dual price philosophy --

Further this line does not make sense to me at all: "The move has caused tremendous damages to the country." If it would have been okay to sell to the Chinese government at the price paid, how does it cause "tremendous damages"? The current regime just made a G2G deal with China. How is that different, especially since the recent deal was at a lower price per tonne than when the shady deal was made.

I hope they get to appeal their dismissal from a nice jail cell. Of course, when the criminal trial is over, they probably won't have much case for being reinstated.

no out on bail and the court will rule 5 years after he died from old age....Like case Samak.

I have to ask. If it was fraudulent in selling to private firms instead of the Chinese government, what money was collected, and how does a government get a better rate per tonne than the private sector? One price for governments and another for everyone else? It's like the ultimate dual price philosophy --

Further this line does not make sense to me at all: "The move has caused tremendous damages to the country." If it would have been okay to sell to the Chinese government at the price paid, how does it cause "tremendous damages"? The current regime just made a G2G deal with China. How is that different, especially since the recent deal was at a lower price per tonne than when the shady deal was made.

Seems you don't know much about the scheme and you still complain about the junta. They were allowed to sell below cost price to other governments but not to private sectors. So what they did here in this scam cutesy of YL and the PTP sell it to fake government for lower price and then sell it back into the system at the higher price.. katching.. instant cash.

So yes there is extra damage..(as the sold rice entered the system at inflated price 2x) I wonder what excuse you will try to come up with now.

I have to ask. If it was fraudulent in selling to private firms instead of the Chinese government, what money was collected, and how does a government get a better rate per tonne than the private sector? One price for governments and another for everyone else? It's like the ultimate dual price philosophy --

Further this line does not make sense to me at all: "The move has caused tremendous damages to the country." If it would have been okay to sell to the Chinese government at the price paid, how does it cause "tremendous damages"? The current regime just made a G2G deal with China. How is that different, especially since the recent deal was at a lower price per tonne than when the shady deal was made.

Seems you don't know much about the scheme and you still complain about the junta. They were allowed to sell below cost price to other governments but not to private sectors. So what they did here in this scam cutesy of YL and the PTP sell it to fake government for lower price and then sell it back into the system at the higher price.. katching.. instant cash.

So yes there is extra damage..(as the sold rice entered the system at inflated price 2x) I wonder what excuse you will try to come up with now.

Perhaps the PT supporters who don't really know what anything about this should start at the beginning and read the original report of the Democrats evidence they presented at the no confidence debate in 2012, then do some research to follow on from there.

To help alleviate their ignorance I will post a link to start them off :

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/600926-rice-deals-with-china-fake-thai-democrats/

An excerpt from that :

In the latest deal, the Chinese firm paid Bt300 per sack of rice, rather than market price of Bt1,500-Bt1,555, Varong said. Taking this into account, the men in question would make a profit of Bt20 billion. Also, he said, the rice has not gone anywhere but is being stored in Siam President's warehouse in Phichit, he said. There are some 400,000 sacks of rice in the facility, collected between May 5 and July 16, he added.

So as you see from that small snip this is about large corruption and now questions are being asked where that money went. Oh yes and the rice also.

By the way there was one genuine G2G deal with China for a million tons, however only 300,000 tons was ever delivered and now I see in the BKK Post that the Chinese Govt is asking for the rest.

This, presumably, being the same deal that the commerce minister of the time swore to, but cited national security reasons for not providing details.

. There should be consequences for liars and cheats especially when it affects the country's citizens.

Hasn't been too much of that in the past!

"unauthorized Chinese private sector in getting the G2G rice deal through fraudulent channel."

Interesting that there is no further details on the Chinese side of the conspiracy. There is no mention of any evidence provided by the Chinese government or even indication of a Chinese investigation. How exactly can an "unauthorized Chinese private sector" exist without approval of the Chinese government in an alleged public government-to-government transaction?

I suspect the guilty may have some yet undiclosed insider information concerning higher government officials in both governments that could be used to barter lessor penalties.

Good question, my dear rickirs.

It would seem something got lost in translation.

2015-02-12

"In it's investigation, the NACC found that both the Ministers are accused of falsifying G2G rice deals for about 1.2m tonnes between Thailand and China in 2013. The agency noted the deal never happened and the rice was sold locally. It stated the rice was sold to two China-based companies at prices lower than the pledging price, who in tuern sold it to a Thai private company to resell. The NACC said the two companies were not acting on behalf of the Chinese government."

http://www.oryza.com/thai-nacc-recommend-legal-action-g2g-rice-deals-china

2013-03-23

"Amidst doubts about the transparency of government-to-government (G2G) rice deals, the Commerce Ministry yesterday said the result of its investigation into a sales contract with China's state-owned GSSG enterprise showed it was clean."

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Clean-chit-for-rice-deal-with-China-30202533.html

2012-11-27

"Varong backed his case by saying that one of the buyers, Guangzhou-based GSSG Import and Export Corporation, was actually represented by a Thai man called Rathanit Sojirakul, who later authorised Phichit-based Nimon Rakdi to since a contract to purchase 5 million tonnes of rice on the company's behalf.

The Democrat pointed out that Rathanit was a close aide to Pheu Thai MP Rapeephan Phongruangrong, who is the wife of red-shirt leader Arisman Phongruangrong."

https://sg.entertainment.yahoo.com/news/thailand-rice-deals-china-fake-says-opposition-060002460.html

GSSG http://www.gssgsailing.com/102cecf/about_gssg.htm

This, presumably, being the same deal that the commerce minister of the time swore to, but cited national security reasons for not providing details.

National security, personal security, same same...

This, presumably, being the same deal that the commerce minister of the time swore to, but cited national security reasons for not providing details.

National security, personal security, same same...

AKA - don't blame me! It was the other guy