Jump to content

Anti-coup marcher allowed to walk


webfact

Recommended Posts

Anti-Coup Marcher Allowed to Walk
By Khaosod English

14264946161426495216l.jpg
Pansak Srithep was allowed to continue his anti-coup march on 15 March 2015.

BANGKOK — An anti-coup activist was allowed to continue his symbolic march against the military junta in Bangkok yesterday following a change of tactics from police, who had arrested him for walking on the previous day.

Police officers detained Pansak Srithep on Saturday, only an hour after he began what was supposed to be a 50-km "march for justice" in protest of the junta’s suppression of civil rights. Police said the walk was a political activity, which the junta banned after seizing power last May. Pansak was later released that afternoon without charges.

Pansak renewed his walk on Sunday, starting in Bangkok's Makkasak district, where his 17-year-old son Samapan Srithep was shot dead during the military crackdown on Redshirt protesters in May 2010.

Police officers followed Pansak throughout his walk, but made no attempts to arrest him. One of the police officers told reporters they were there to prevent any "third hand party" from picking a fight with Pansak or "causing chaos."

At the spot where Samapan was killed, now marked by a small plaque on the road, Pansak read a poem dedicated to his son. Although a court inquest investigating the cause of Samapan’s death has not been released, witnesses say he was killed by soldiers who opened fire on Redshirt protesters near Soi Ratchaprarop 18 during the crackdown on 15 May 2010.

After reading the poem, Pansak walked to the Royal Plaza and laid flowers on a small plaque that marks the spot where a group of military officers and civilians seized power from the royal government on 24 June 1932 and proclaimed Thailand a constitutional democracy. He then continued on to Thammasat University.

Source: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/detail.php?newsid=1426494616&section=11&typecate=06

kse.png
-- Khaosod English 2015-03-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It will do good for him.

That belly of his needs some exercise and walking is the best.

The guys son was killed allegedly by the army, and this is the best you can come up with??

Shame on you!!

And yes, unlike the Greeks, the Thais can afford food!!coffee1.gif

He was not allegedly killed he was killed by the army. A Thai court found his death to be at the hands of the army. Article for your info http://news.yahoo.com/four-thai-activists-face-military-court-landmark-case-072417762.html.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are protesting and the army is called out to quell the protests then someone is going to get hurt. His son knew the risks, soldiers are trained to kill, his son put himself in harms way. The protest march against the current authority that rules is perhaps part of his grieving process and perhaps influenced by the company he keeps now.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will do good for him.

That belly of his needs some exercise and walking is the best.

The guys son was killed allegedly by the army, and this is the best you can come up with??

Shame on you!!

And yes, unlike the Greeks, the Thais can afford food!!coffee1.gif

Don't pretend that this is anything more than a gimmick.

Do you think that if his son had been killed by a drunken motorist he would be protesting at the Samsong or Chang headquarters about alcohol consumption?

Maybe not. But a grieving parent, in such a situation, might well become invoved in an Anti Drink Driving campaign.

In 1956 John Osborne wrote what is recognised as one of the most significant plays of the 20th century. You may have heard of it, but I would not be suprised if you haven't. It was called "Look Back in Anger".

In the play one of the characters tells another:

“ if you were to have a child and if that child would die, then you might suffer enough to become a human being”

Do you have a child? My guess is no. But If you do, there’s hope for you yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will do good for him.

That belly of his needs some exercise and walking is the best.

The guys son was killed allegedly by the army, and this is the best you can come up with??

Shame on you!!

And yes, unlike the Greeks, the Thais can afford food!!coffee1.gif

Don't pretend that this is anything more than a gimmick.

Do you think that if his son had been killed by a drunken motorist he would be protesting at the Samsong or Chang headquarters about alcohol consumption?

You see no difference and nuance there?

Accident under the influence- ordered shooting of unarmed civilians...just for starters?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are protesting and the army is called out to quell the protests then someone is going to get hurt. His son knew the risks, soldiers are trained to kill, his son put himself in harms way. The protest march against the current authority that rules is perhaps part of his grieving process and perhaps influenced by the company he keeps now.

Oh well that's ok then, fire away. He deserved it. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

If you are protesting and the army is called out to quell the protests then someone is going to get hurt. His son knew the risks, soldiers are trained to kill, his son put himself in harms way. The protest march against the current authority that rules is perhaps part of his grieving process and perhaps influenced by the company he keeps now.

????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are protesting and the army is called out to quell the protests then someone is going to get hurt. His son knew the risks, soldiers are trained to kill, his son put himself in harms way. The protest march against the current authority that rules is perhaps part of his grieving process and perhaps influenced by the company he keeps now.

Don't know what country you hail from, but is it common there for soldiers to fire on protestors with live ammo in urban free fire zones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could only happen in a military dictatorship, right? Or Queensland.

"On the same day in 1978, Bundaberg dentist Henry Akers subjected the government policy to utter ridicule when he applied for a police permit to march down a No Through Road at 2.45am with his dog, Jaffa. He informed the police that he would be carrying a protest placard and that the march would be peaceful. The placard read:

"The majority is not omnipotent. The majority can be wrong and is capable of tyranny."

The applications were refused. Undeterred, Henry Akers and his dog undertook an illegal march down a quiet street in the early hours of April Fools' Day, watched by a carload of detectives. However, the detectives did not arrest him (or his dog)." https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/taking-to-the-streets-of-brisbane,4572

Look at the sign the anti-democratic bastard was carrying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can possibly hope that in the long term a few more will join this brave person and voice there right as a free nation not a repressed one like now and if the Junta supporters don't like that word repressed think about it and look at the repressive measures introduced all under the disguise of freedom, lets face it , you certainly don't know the mind of the Thai military, after knowing three 4 stars, I think I am qualified to say that.coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will do good for him.

That belly of his needs some exercise and walking is the best.

The guys son was killed allegedly by the army, and this is the best you can come up with??

Shame on you!!

And yes, unlike the Greeks, the Thais can afford food!!coffee1.gif

He was not allegedly killed he was killed by the army. A Thai court found his death to be at the hands of the army. Article for your info http://news.yahoo.com/four-thai-activists-face-military-court-landmark-case-072417762.html.

All I see is "an activist whose son was killed in a 2010 army crackdown on anti-government protesters" with no mention of a court finding.

Maybe your 'verdict' comes from when Pheu-Thai had that ridiculous pantomime where they got the court to say who was killed by Army bullets. Every wonder why everything stopped there ?. An intelligent person might think they didn't want people to know what they were doing at the time to attract those bullets. But don't let that bother you if it doesn't suit your cause.

That Reuters article is shamefully biased. I see the old favourite "Thammasat university' crops up once again like a bad smell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could only happen in a military dictatorship, right? Or Queensland.

"On the same day in 1978, Bundaberg dentist Henry Akers subjected the government policy to utter ridicule when he applied for a police permit to march down a No Through Road at 2.45am with his dog, Jaffa. He informed the police that he would be carrying a protest placard and that the march would be peaceful. The placard read:

"The majority is not omnipotent. The majority can be wrong and is capable of tyranny."

The applications were refused. Undeterred, Henry Akers and his dog undertook an illegal march down a quiet street in the early hours of April Fools' Day, watched by a carload of detectives. However, the detectives did not arrest him (or his dog)." https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/taking-to-the-streets-of-brisbane,4572

Look at the sign the anti-democratic bastard was carrying.

Wow, you post something from nearly 40 years ago to show that a protestor was NOT arrested. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will do good for him.

That belly of his needs some exercise and walking is the best.

The guys son was killed allegedly by the army, and this is the best you can come up with??

Shame on you!!

And yes, unlike the Greeks, the Thais can afford food!!coffee1.gif

yes when his son demonstrated AGAINST Democracy....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are protesting and the army is called out to quell the protests then someone is going to get hurt. His son knew the risks, soldiers are trained to kill, his son put himself in harms way. The protest march against the current authority that rules is perhaps part of his grieving process and perhaps influenced by the company he keeps now.

Don't know what country you hail from, but is it common there for soldiers to fire on protestors with live ammo in urban free fire zones?

In war, if the enemy is firing at you then there is the instinct to fire back otherwise you will become a victim yourself. There were reports that the black shirts were amongst the people at the temple and so if anyone is to blame then it is them!!

What will this pointless walk achieve? I don't know why these people do this as it is meaningless IMO.

The protesters were told to disperse and they would be allowed to go back home peacefully - I'm guessing that the red shirt leaders (under Thaksin's command) were telling them to remain. So, in essence, it was Thaksin and the red/black shirts between them that were the cause of the loss of these lives and not Abhisit or the army.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could only happen in a military dictatorship, right? Or Queensland.

"On the same day in 1978, Bundaberg dentist Henry Akers subjected the government policy to utter ridicule when he applied for a police permit to march down a No Through Road at 2.45am with his dog, Jaffa. He informed the police that he would be carrying a protest placard and that the march would be peaceful. The placard read:

"The majority is not omnipotent. The majority can be wrong and is capable of tyranny."

The applications were refused. Undeterred, Henry Akers and his dog undertook an illegal march down a quiet street in the early hours of April Fools' Day, watched by a carload of detectives. However, the detectives did not arrest him (or his dog)." https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/taking-to-the-streets-of-brisbane,4572

Look at the sign the anti-democratic bastard was carrying.

Wow, you post something from nearly 40 years ago to show that a protestor was NOT arrested. ?

I suppose it was WAAAAy to much to expect that you might read the link. Or understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...