Suthep reports to NACC for 2010 crackdown charges

[Skywalker69]

Still hiding behind the robes. Look at me, I am a spiritual leader and a man of peace, I would never break a law. Sickening and this lowlife makes me sick. He is pure evil and the devil himself would not even accept him. I believe the devil has a restraining order on Suthep.

When are all the high ranking military officers going to be asked to explain or are they now the rulers and exempt?

Still hiding behind the robes.

At least he is not hiding in Dubai.

Hmmm, if this works for Suthep, maybe Thaksin can come back as a Monk and also not have charges!

Thaksin is free to come back when ever he wants.

[city]

Still hiding behind the robes. Look at me, I am a spiritual leader and a man of peace, I would never break a law. Sickening and this lowlife makes me sick. He is pure evil and the devil himself would not even accept him. I believe the devil has a restraining order on Suthep.

When are all the high ranking military officers going to be asked to explain or are they now the rulers and exempt?

Still hiding behind the robes.

At least he is not hiding in Dubai.

Why would he want to hide anywhere. He and the military colluded to disrupt the nation to allow (in their twisted minds) the way for a coup. By his own admission he was in talks with Prayut long before the coup

[Skywalker69]

Tokay #17 said.

"Living the good life in Dubai is hardly hiding. However, what is is going is avoiding an unfair trial".

Unfair trial? He is a convicted criminal. Whom was running Thailand when he was sentenced?

[Equalizer]

Using this logic, any doctor that tried to help a patient(who later succumbed to injuries) should be punished. Silly really, because it was the underlying condition that was the killer. I don't believe Abhisit and Suthep woke one morning and decided to have the army fire willy-nilly into pedestrians going about their daily activities. Wasn't there and evil wanna-be dictator for life sponsoring a violent uprising to gain power, face and profit to the express cost of the uneducated and poor(who ironically were his main supporters)?

Deary Deary me. Oh how little you know. This man has taken money from the poor via his political position and made billions of dollars, more than the little red man ever made. You never read about the palm oil refinery scam? Look it up mate it is shocking. At least the rice farmers where paid double market price, the palm farmers had a block put on all exports and was all bought by him and his monopoly for half the market price. Then he turned it into billions of dollars profit refining it all. Yes everyone here are robbers but there are Robbing Barstuards and Robbing Hoods.

[khunken]

Still hiding behind the robes. Look at me, I am a spiritual leader and a man of peace, I would never break a law. Sickening and this lowlife makes me sick. He is pure evil and the devil himself would not even accept him. I believe the devil has a restraining order on Suthep.

When are all the high ranking military officers going to be asked to explain or are they now the rulers and exempt?

Still hiding behind the robes.

At least he is not hiding in Dubai.

Why would he want to hide anywhere. He and the military colluded to disrupt the nation to allow (in their twisted minds) the way for a coup. By his own admission he was in talks with Prayut long before the coup

Looks like you were asleep during the last lot of protests.

He organised the largest ever set of demonstrations against the amnesty for big bro' bill, thereby getting the senate to unanimously vote against it. For that he deserves the thanks of all thinking people.

Yes, he then went too far for too long and his supporters paid the price of being targets of big bro's militias and the army stepped in as the police (as instructed by CAPO) were refusing to do their job and arrest the real perpetrators.

It was really straight forward without any conspiracy theories about collusion beforehand. He did ask the army to step in before they did which might have saved a few lives. But the army patiently waited until there was no possibility of a peaceful outcome.

[aaacorp]

First, If you think Abhisit or Suthep may not wake up one morning and say, or at least think "let's move this and shoot them all.." you have not really understood thai and asian mentality..neither had you witnessed the social ranks stupidities...

Second Suthep is a corrupted politician, this cannot be denied, it has been proved and testomonies from his political side even approve it.

Third, he is not hiding of course, but guess what this saffron dress can do to help people having problems with police, army,....

Fourth : why do you think he arrives with his monk attitude? because he is really religious or because the will encline buddhist people to judge him less severly, why adding his picture as a monk on the report he made...

In fact he uses the same communication and marketing tools that Walt Disney would use to promote MIckey Mouse

Edited March 27, 2015 by aaacorp

[Skywalker69]

Still hiding behind the robes. Look at me, I am a spiritual leader and a man of peace, I would never break a law. Sickening and this lowlife makes me sick. He is pure evil and the devil himself would not even accept him. I believe the devil has a restraining order on Suthep.

When are all the high ranking military officers going to be asked to explain or are they now the rulers and exempt?

Still hiding behind the robes.

At least he is not hiding in Dubai.

Why would he want to hide anywhere. He and the military colluded to disrupt the nation to allow (in their twisted minds) the way for a coup. By his own admission he was in talks with Prayut long before the coup

What ever, he is still a coward.

[Alwyn]

Oh strewth, robes and all....

and showing off a photo of him in robes too..

[Alwyn]

I wake an hour earlier every morning so I can hate Suthep more

[rubl]

I wake an hour earlier every morning so I can hate Suthep more

Lack of sleep may indeed explain your attitude

[rubl]

Oh strewth, robes and all....

and showing off a photo of him in robes too..

Well, since his explanation of 2010 events needed a cover page and knowing underboob selfies are culturally unacceptable ... ...

[Fat Haggis]

nothing will ever come of this.

just smoke & mirrors...

Yes it will. They will be found to have being doing their job in clearing the protesters who were squatting illegally, unlike Yingluck, who was er........just there in parliament (on occasions) getting others to do her job.

If the men-in-black hadn't have started shooting at the army then none of this would have happened. The soldiers were told to use live rounds in order to protect themselves - which they did!!!

I have the feeling that they might be impeached to justify Yingluck getting 'the big one' and it may be no bad thing as the less politicians there are the better!!!

I sincerely hope that you feel the same way about the protesters from 2014 who entered premises illegally too and the ones who barricaded polling stations?

Somehow I doubt that very much, I have a feeling you've been a previous banned poster as well.

The less Politicians the better? So democracy in any shape or form where there's a healthy opposition doesn't suit your styl;e of living? I wonder what your resident country was like that you left to feel happy living under a Military Junta.

I'll be honest, I don't like it, I didn't come here to live or have my family live without choices and rights, within the law, but I'm here, and as long as I follow the laws, and don't bring attention to myself then I'll crack on for the sake of my family.

I'm also very aware of WHY the Junta need to be in control till after the event, reforms and reconciliation are nothing but smoke and mirrors behind the facade of the bigger game being played at the top end of the scale.

For someone who stated they've been here 7 years and you're not aware of the bigger picture, makes me more inclined to believe you're not interested and that you're only here to wind people up.

The difference is, that the two protests you refer to were peaceful protests without guns. That is a big difference.

I wasn't referring to 'a healthy opposition or not' as you put it, I mean ALL politicians as they are self serving and only seem to be in government for the money and....well money (Abhisit and Korn excluded).

I am not living under a military junta - I am living exactly the same as before but with peace and stability and I can sense a general feeling of happiness that this General has brought to the Thai people throughout the country, I am not a great supporter of democracy admitted as it has too many flaws. In an ideal world (no such thing) then it would work beautifully, but surely you cannot possibly think that this 'democratically elected' government was even close to being democratic due to the abuses and non adherence to democratic rule once it got it's foot through the door under false pretences.

I am bringing attention to myself!!! adding my piece to a forum constitutes bringing attention to myself!!!

Crikey, you realise why the junta's intervention was necessary, well that's one thing we are agreed on at least. The reforms are needed because Thailand could not carry on as it was. I was pleased to see that the main proponents of complaint were the politicians as that signals to me that he is getting it right. They must be tearing their hair out that the government is closing their loopholes and cracking down on corruption both actively and through the constitution revamp that is making checks and balances (particularly relating to the procurement of large projects where they can rake it in) so much more transparent and open to the public.

I can see the bigger picture my friend, don't worry about that - if what I write winds people up then that is their problem. I may goad people on occasions (I think we all do given the chance) but I believe that I have my finger on the pulse and if I disagree with someone's view then I counter with my own and rely on my own arguments to carry the day!!

They still occupied places illegally Lucky, guns or no guns, violent or non violent, if you're going to apply the rule of law, apply it evenly, of course the more violent protesters caused more destruction, but it's selective justice if the two groups occupied the same buildings illegally.

All politicians are self serving ? There are over 50 I believe at the last count different political parties in Thailand pre coup, not all of these politicians were/are self serving, what makes the current Junta any different then? You don't believe that many there are abusing their power and self serving?

You are, if you reside in Thailand, whether you like it or not, living under the Junta, you are abiding by the laws of the land, and do what the Junta instruct you to do, they have not gone as far as imposing all the restrictions on the farang community they have on the Thai community, for a very good reason... we're not Thais

The drawing attention to ones self was a figure of speech, it wasn't stating that you personally were doing so, and in this I am looking more towards being involved openly vocally about Thai politics and openly criticising the junta, not from the comfort of TVF. You have pointed out that you're living under peace and stability, that maybe the case if you lived in the areas of Bangkok that were taken over as protest areas. I have never felt anything other than peace and stability in my area up in Korat, I'm sure many others all over Thailand in places where there was zero protests or daily disruptions feel the same.

If the current Junta is all about checks and balances, WHOm are they accountable to? The reason for the coup, I'm not convinced, the levels of violence were not increasing, and why not step in after the first week of fatalities? It wasn't till after the removal of Yingluck by the courts, for an abuse of power, the very same thing that still goes on today, though nepotism and cronyism, but that's allowed as it's their ball, and they'll move the goalposts to suit.

A coup was always on the cards, even when Prayuth was telling the world he wouldn't stage one... aye okay, as if you can't plan a coup over breakfast like !! .

You state you hate the Shins with a passion, and yet you don't believe that you're living under a Junta, what exactly was the impact on your life here as a farang that was so horrendous under the Shins that you feel this way? Were you subjected to laws that were different then, as you are today? Do you pay less taxes today as you did then? (if you pay work and pay them that is? ) What was different about your quality of life under the Shins, that makes you swallow the Kool aid like a man who's just crossed the Sahara desert?

My life was never so horrendous here that I've developed a hatred for anyone or anything, I abide by the countries Laws, and keep myself to myself, and don't feel the need to impose my opinions about what a democracy is on anyone, let alone my Thai friends, that's down to them, if they wanted to chose Ronald MacDonald as their leader, it's down to them, no different to those in the UK who in the past voted for "Screaming Lord Such" or in the present day the "BNP" ... their choice their right.

There's so much more to life, than getting involved in a subject that Thais wont' let you be part of.. their politics.

[donmuang37]

Hmmm... I think that Suthep and Abhisit are being charged, and will be acquitted so that they can return to politics without the sword of justice hanging over their heads. (Whitewashed?) Pigs will fly before either of them will be found guilty, let alone receive any severe punishment. IMHO justice is obviously not color blind. And the vast majority of the 90+ killed were not military people. They were civilians. A couple of past court cases ruled the particular parties in those cases were killed my military rounds fired from the direction where troops were located. As soon as all this blows over, Suthep will shed those robes in a heartbeat!

[rubl]

Hmmm... I think that Suthep and Abhisit are being charged, and will be acquitted so that they can return to politics without the sword of justice hanging over their heads. (Whitewashed?) Pigs will fly before either of them will be found guilty, let alone receive any severe punishment. IMHO justice is obviously not color blind. And the vast majority of the 90+ killed were not military people. They were civilians. A couple of past court cases ruled the particular parties in those cases were killed my military rounds fired from the direction where troops were located. As soon as all this blows over, Suthep will shed those robes in a heartbeat!

Off course it also might be that they are not guilty of the charge of "abuse of power". The charge of "premediated murder as private persons" dropped at the Criminal Court seemed more wishful thinking and a bit of pressure to have the Democrat party agree with the Blanket Amnesty Bill. Even the idea floated by former Pheu Thai party list MP and UDD co-leader Dr. weng to legally recognise the ICC to allow it to investigate a clearly defined aspect of the 2010 'protests' seemed to point in that direction, just like the statements of one former Pheu Thai MP to go to the Hague to request the ICC to charge Abhisit/Suthep.

A couple of past Inquests ruled that most likely some casualties were killed by military personel, but they concentrated on deaths only whereas when someone is being charged all circumstancial evidences can and will be used (by pro and con of course). Furthermore even Tarit of DSI fame stated to concentrate on the easy cases first and it seems 10 deaths have been covered by now. The cynic in me voices that this was again a move to put some pressure on the Democrat party to accept the Blanket Amnesty Bill.

Interesting that Abhisit and Suthep have always stated to want justice in court and even tried to sue the DSI for going through the Criminal Court instead of having the NACC process the investigation and drop a charge at the Supreme Court for Political Office Holders. They didn't run away, they heard and acknowledged all charge both at the OAG offices and at court (Suthep with gentle prodding from the army which helped him find the way).

So, obviously other measures are necessary to try to insinuate the duo is guilty.

[tbthailand]

Suthep said ... with "perpetrators using war weapons to kill people, police, and soldiers in the middle of the city."

so that was 2010 and...

this was 2014:

A Human Rights Watch researcher told VOA that militants had M79 grenade launchers and were firing at police.

http://www.voanews.com/content/thai-court-upholds-emergency-decree-warns-against-violence/1854474.html

This guy is a knucklehead.

The normal obfuscation and apples and oranges.

So, 2014 explains 2010? A single grenade thrown at police in 2014 with more than 100 grenades lobbed on anti-government protesters and most cowardly in the night (Bangkok Post kept a count it seems). Absolutely comparable with 2010 with grenades only lobbed on non-protesters like police, military, a reporter and normal people. The similarity seems in anti-government protests, but there it stops.

Anyway, both Abhisit and Suthep deposited their explanations. The fun can continue.

the deliberate 'obfuscation' began with your troll post.

You consistently and deliberately misrepresent the conflict over the last 10 years, and you apparently have no idea what happened before that time although you claim to have lived here for a couple of decades if my memory serves me.

I have not time for dutch fascists, not even polite ones.

[tbthailand]

Yes it will. They will be found to have being doing their job in clearing the protesters who were squatting illegally, unlike Yingluck, who was er........just there in parliament (on occasions) getting others to do her job.

If the men-in-black hadn't have started shooting at the army then none of this would have happened. The soldiers were told to use live rounds in order to protect themselves - which they did!!!

I have the feeling that they might be impeached to justify Yingluck getting 'the big one' and it may be no bad thing as the less politicians there are the better!!!

I sincerely hope that you feel the same way about the protesters from 2014 who entered premises illegally too and the ones who barricaded polling stations?

Somehow I doubt that very much, I have a feeling you've been a previous banned poster as well.

The less Politicians the better? So democracy in any shape or form where there's a healthy opposition doesn't suit your styl;e of living? I wonder what your resident country was like that you left to feel happy living under a Military Junta.

I'll be honest, I don't like it, I didn't come here to live or have my family live without choices and rights, within the law, but I'm here, and as long as I follow the laws, and don't bring attention to myself then I'll crack on for the sake of my family.

I'm also very aware of WHY the Junta need to be in control till after the event, reforms and reconciliation are nothing but smoke and mirrors behind the facade of the bigger game being played at the top end of the scale.

For someone who stated they've been here 7 years and you're not aware of the bigger picture, makes me more inclined to believe you're not interested and that you're only here to wind people up.

The difference is, that the two protests you refer to were peaceful protests without guns. That is a big difference.

I wasn't referring to 'a healthy opposition or not' as you put it, I mean ALL politicians as they are self serving and only seem to be in government for the money and....well money (Abhisit and Korn excluded).

I am not living under a military junta - I am living exactly the same as before but with peace and stability and I can sense a general feeling of happiness that this General has brought to the Thai people throughout the country, I am not a great supporter of democracy admitted as it has too many flaws. In an ideal world (no such thing) then it would work beautifully, but surely you cannot possibly think that this 'democratically elected' government was even close to being democratic due to the abuses and non adherence to democratic rule once it got it's foot through the door under false pretences.

I am bringing attention to myself!!! adding my piece to a forum constitutes bringing attention to myself!!!

Crikey, you realise why the junta's intervention was necessary, well that's one thing we are agreed on at least. The reforms are needed because Thailand could not carry on as it was. I was pleased to see that the main proponents of complaint were the politicians as that signals to me that he is getting it right. They must be tearing their hair out that the government is closing their loopholes and cracking down on corruption both actively and through the constitution revamp that is making checks and balances (particularly relating to the procurement of large projects where they can rake it in) so much more transparent and open to the public.

I can see the bigger picture my friend, don't worry about that - if what I write winds people up then that is their problem. I may goad people on occasions (I think we all do given the chance) but I believe that I have my finger on the pulse and if I disagree with someone's view then I counter with my own and rely on my own arguments to carry the day!!

They still occupied places illegally Lucky, guns or no guns, violent or non violent, if you're going to apply the rule of law, apply it evenly, of course the more violent protesters caused more destruction, but it's selective justice if the two groups occupied the same buildings illegally.

All politicians are self serving ? There are over 50 I believe at the last count different political parties in Thailand pre coup, not all of these politicians were/are self serving, what makes the current Junta any different then? You don't believe that many there are abusing their power and self serving?

You are, if you reside in Thailand, whether you like it or not, living under the Junta, you are abiding by the laws of the land, and do what the Junta instruct you to do, they have not gone as far as imposing all the restrictions on the farang community they have on the Thai community, for a very good reason... we're not Thais

The drawing attention to ones self was a figure of speech, it wasn't stating that you personally were doing so, and in this I am looking more towards being involved openly vocally about Thai politics and openly criticising the junta, not from the comfort of TVF. You have pointed out that you're living under peace and stability, that maybe the case if you lived in the areas of Bangkok that were taken over as protest areas. I have never felt anything other than peace and stability in my area up in Korat, I'm sure many others all over Thailand in places where there was zero protests or daily disruptions feel the same.

If the current Junta is all about checks and balances, WHOm are they accountable to? The reason for the coup, I'm not convinced, the levels of violence were not increasing, and why not step in after the first week of fatalities? It wasn't till after the removal of Yingluck by the courts, for an abuse of power, the very same thing that still goes on today, though nepotism and cronyism, but that's allowed as it's their ball, and they'll move the goalposts to suit.

A coup was always on the cards, even when Prayuth was telling the world he wouldn't stage one... aye okay, as if you can't plan a coup over breakfast like !! .

You state you hate the Shins with a passion, and yet you don't believe that you're living under a Junta, what exactly was the impact on your life here as a farang that was so horrendous under the Shins that you feel this way? Were you subjected to laws that were different then, as you are today? Do you pay less taxes today as you did then? (if you pay work and pay them that is? ) What was different about your quality of life under the Shins, that makes you swallow the Kool aid like a man who's just crossed the Sahara desert?

My life was never so horrendous here that I've developed a hatred for anyone or anything, I abide by the countries Laws, and keep myself to myself, and don't feel the need to impose my opinions about what a democracy is on anyone, let alone my Thai friends, that's down to them, if they wanted to chose Ronald MacDonald as their leader, it's down to them, no different to those in the UK who in the past voted for "Screaming Lord Such" or in the present day the "BNP" ... their choice their right.

There's so much more to life, than getting involved in a subject that Thais wont' let you be part of.. their politics.

They still occupied places illegally Lucky, guns or no guns, violent or non violent, if you're going to apply the rule of law, apply it evenly, of course the more violent protesters caused more destruction, but it's selective justice if the two groups occupied the same buildings illegally.

your point is valid, but I would point out that there exists a group of people for whom one side has always been peaceful and the other side are armed/paid/mercenary thugs. It's a blinkered view of the conflict. The PAD/PDRC side have always been armed and they have always been violent. And they have - like the red shirts - always had a bunch of normal folks out protesting.

Some posters have such an asymmetrical view of the conflict that any opinion that more closely reflects reality is "biased". Go figure...

PS: just need to delete my original comment that nothing will come of this - to which the response was the rather unremarkable, if no one had shot at the military this would have never happened... and that the military attack was some how self-defense. This can only come from posters who not only don't understand the events of 2010 but also don't know about the 60 years that preceded 2010.

[tbthailand]

At least he is not hiding in Dubai.

Still hiding behind the robes.

Why would he want to hide anywhere. He and the military colluded to disrupt the nation to allow (in their twisted minds) the way for a coup. By his own admission he was in talks with Prayut long before the coup

Looks like you were asleep during the last lot of protests.

He organised the largest ever set of demonstrations against the amnesty for big bro' bill, thereby getting the senate to unanimously vote against it. For that he deserves the thanks of all thinking people.

Yes, he then went too far for too long and his supporters paid the price of being targets of big bro's militias and the army stepped in as the police (as instructed by CAPO) were refusing to do their job and arrest the real perpetrators.

It was really straight forward without any conspiracy theories about collusion beforehand. He did ask the army to step in before they did which might have saved a few lives. But the army patiently waited until there was no possibility of a peaceful outcome.

that is a fairly sanitized, PDRC view of the last protests.

Suthep called for military intervention in November & December of 2013 - right from the start.

It was clear from the moment they hit the streets what the end game would be.

This group is not very creative, same MO as 2006 and 2008.

[Baerboxer]

Suthep said he told officials that Thailand was nearing a state of war prior to the 2010 crackdown,

2010, country on the "brink of war", the military cracks down on the protesters.

2014, country on the "brink of war", the military cracks down on the government.

At least they are color-consistent.

Just as consistent as the RTP:

2010 - fail to do their duty.

2014 - fail to do their duty.

Or Thaksin:

2010 - kept well away despite all the bravado

2014 - kept well away despite all the bravado.

Plenty rotten in the state of Denmark ad Willi would say,

[lucky11]

Last time, as this is wearing me out.

When protests don't invite violence then I am all for it if it is justified. Prayut had to intervene as things were getting extremely nasty (coming almost exclusively from the red side of the divide). He actually gave them not one, but two chances to resolve their differences. They spurned these chances so he decided that nothing was going to change and he stepped in and gave them a bit of a verbal lesson in how to behave by chiding them for the little kids they were and keeping them in detention for up to a week to lecture them for being naughty boys and girls.

The junta aren't/weren't politicians 10 months ago but within that time they are doing a fine job in sorting the country out and they have earned their wings.

I am not living under the junta - what does that mean Mr Haggis? All he (Prayut) is doing is fixing the current problems and making sure that politicians can never again abuse the trust put in them by the Thai electorate through stamping out corruption (the opportunity to use it).

I have always abided by the Thai laws and will continue to do so. The Thai's have some peculiar ways about them but it is necessary to go along with them as we basically have no choice on the matter, being residents in their country.

Why do you think that it is necessary to have a go at the junta (or have the right to have a go at them)? Why not give them credit where its due and don't regard them as your enemies just because they are unelected. Think of it this way - it went from daily fighting to peace and harmony the day he took over from the squabbling masses. I don't deny that he is fixing the constitution so that the political field is even, maybe tilted towards the Democrats gaining power (the red oriented parties won't be able to cheat any more). This however, is an absolute requirement if Thailand is going to function properly in the future.

Everyone should delight in the fact that the Shinawatra's are history at last. I don't hate him for what he has done to me, I hate him for the damage he has done to the country and the Thai people!!!

Prayuth stated when asked about a coup that he couldn't rule one out - it depends on what happens he went on to say. He could have stepped in the first week but chose to give them the opportunity to sort something out. He was very patient, but it was never going to happen so he chose this moment to gatecrash the party and turf them all out!!

You ask again about Thaksin and question me as to why I despise him. I just don't like bad people, serial liars, fraudsters or murderers, we will leave it at that.

[lildragon]

It amuses me so that people so blinded with rage about Thaksin will basically let Suthep off because he plays for their team. Read up on the history of the man and how utterly corrupt he is (to the point of his own party members hating him for it). If Thaksin is the gangster from the North then Suthep is undoubtedly the gangster of the South. He has had so many cases against him yet strangely they never go anywhere. I wonder why that is.

Thaksin is a complete snake but all you yellow tinted mouth breathers are complete hypocrites for thinking Suthep is some sort of hero. Neither he or Marky Mark will see the inside of a cell, that's why they are so confident to turn up. Look at his little dossier with the picture of him on the front for god sake.

[Skywalker69]

I wake an hour earlier every morning so I can hate Suthep more

I feel sorry for you sir.

[lucky11]

It amuses me so that people so blinded with rage about Thaksin will basically let Suthep off because he plays for their team. Read up on the history of the man and how utterly corrupt he is (to the point of his own party members hating him for it). If Thaksin is the gangster from the North then Suthep is undoubtedly the gangster of the South. He has had so many cases against him yet strangely they never go anywhere. I wonder why that is.

Thaksin is a complete snake but all you yellow tinted mouth breathers are complete hypocrites for thinking Suthep is some sort of hero. Neither he or Marky Mark will see the inside of a cell, that's why they are so confident to turn up. Look at his little dossier with the picture of him on the front for god sake.

Sure, he had a murky past, but he succeeded in getting rid of the scamster Thaksin and his cronies which makes him a hero in my eyes.

Whatever went on before counts for nought as he fully redeemed his self by 'killing' the snake and ridding us of this evil clan the Shinawatra's!!

Edited March 27, 2015 by lucky11

[lildragon]

It amuses me so that people so blinded with rage about Thaksin will basically let Suthep off because he plays for their team. Read up on the history of the man and how utterly corrupt he is (to the point of his own party members hating him for it). If Thaksin is the gangster from the North then Suthep is undoubtedly the gangster of the South. He has had so many cases against him yet strangely they never go anywhere. I wonder why that is.

Thaksin is a complete snake but all you yellow tinted mouth breathers are complete hypocrites for thinking Suthep is some sort of hero. Neither he or Marky Mark will see the inside of a cell, that's why they are so confident to turn up. Look at his little dossier with the picture of him on the front for god sake.

Sure, he had a murky past, but he succeeded in getting rid of the scamster Thaksin and his cronies which makes him a hero in my eyes.

Whatever went on before counts for nought as he fully redeemed his self by 'killing' the snake and ridding us of this evil clan the Shinawatra's!!

Corruption is A-OK as long as it is our boys doing it eh?

Hero? He was just an actor, the face of the shadowy elite he serves, a bit like Yingluck in a way by being a complete public puppet.

Edited March 27, 2015 by lildragon

[Amavel]

This guy is a bubble short of level and not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[djjamie]

Of course the greatest enemy of the red shirts are Monks.

At least he showed. Robes and all with out sending a single lawyer to represent him while he hid in the temple. Jaturporn and Nattawut could learn a thing for the "Mandela of the East" when it comes to respect for the law and turning up when you are required to.

The reds in the security of numbers have been known to beat defenseless monks senseless so thank goodness for martial law.

[icare999]

thank you kuun Suphet many forget due to you hopefully an evil megalomaniac is put finally in his place

many have lots to thank you for

[lildragon]

Mandela of the East! Ohh how my sides doth hurt!

Do all you yellow lads actually believe he is some kind of pariah or do you just completely ignore is corruption filled past? A recent example of him holding shares in a media company that received government concessions which is illegal. He quit as an MP before he went to court for it though

Maybe you lot just stick your fingers in your ears and sing "lalalalalalala"

[cookee68]

Where can I get one of those robes so that I can hide all my wrong doings behind it,

[soundman]

Posts removed.

Stop the name calling please.

[harada]

A quick slap on the wrist and off you go, jobs right.