joe1912 Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Has anyone else noticed that Andorra are clearly playing with 12 men. They have blatantly sneaked on a red plastic bag, which has been doing better than the combined Andorra defence. Unfortunately for Andorra the bag's positional sense is not too good and it has steadily been making its way up the field all game. Maybe it was thinking of grabbing one at the other end. Unless someone opens the gates of the stadium then I don't think it will play too big a part in the second half. Oh well its more entertaining than the Andorra effort. Gerard MOM up to now for a nice finish and a good cross for Defoe to score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suegha Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 I noticed the plastic bag was actively off-side! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe1912 Posted September 2, 2006 Author Share Posted September 2, 2006 I noticed the plastic bag was actively off-side! yes more than can be said for the Andorra strike force... and I notice when tackled it did not go down like erm a bag of potatoes.. well it wouldn't would it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lampard10 Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Well, we were only playing with ten men. Robinson popped out for a pint after ten minutes and didn't get back till the 89th . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jockstar Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. I haven't seen a score like that for yonks! Could it be another Argentina? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe1912 Posted September 3, 2006 Author Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchok Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double. What is the population of Andora? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jockstar Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double. So we still won 6-0. After just getting a draw 2-2 the last time we played them. Anyway what is the population of Andora? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jockstar Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 (edited) Just googled and found out. Andora 64,000 Faroes July 2005 est. 47,017 - 2004 census 48,228 Edited September 3, 2006 by Jockstar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchok Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Just googled and found out.Andora 64,000 July 2005 est. 47,017 - 2004 census 48,228 Now that's a very large place.Great to see the pommies have a good win.Must have done wonders for their confidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jockstar Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Just googled and found out. Andora 64,000 July 2005 est. 47,017 - 2004 census 48,228 Now that's a very large place.Great to see the pommies have a good win.Must have done wonders for their confidence. Just edited my last post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game4shame Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Scotland won 6-0. Sorry for hijacking this thread. you failed to qualify the 6-0 win by mentioning it was against the Faroes (Islands I think not mummies). It must be a good feeling to have taken maximum points against the mighty Faroes. Just the tricky away leg to go and you can claim that elusive double. how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers. delusions of superiority me thinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 Andora's population is less than the capacity at Old Trafford! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers.delusions of superiority me thinks. Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html Czech Republic also had names on their shirts. So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game4shame Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers. delusions of superiority me thinks. Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html Czech Republic also had names on their shirts. So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted> hook, line and sinker!!! Im doing Sunday overtime at work - got to keep myself entertained somehow!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchok Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 I'm amazed that the name their backs were not sequined... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted September 3, 2006 Share Posted September 3, 2006 how anal are England anyway? names on the back of the shirt - whats that about? cant recall other teams doing that in qualifiers. delusions of superiority me thinks. Germany had names on their shirts http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002390...6400716,00.html Czech Republic also had names on their shirts. So that's at least 3 teams who are anal. Or, who can afford the lettering. I think it's just that the jocks are too tight fisted to splash out on putting names on shirts. After all, they can be used again in the next match and it wouldn't be too prudent if they didn't have the same player in the same shirt, would it Get a grip, game4shame, your'e talking <deleted> hook, line and sinker!!! Im doing Sunday overtime at work - got to keep myself entertained somehow!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe1912 Posted September 4, 2006 Author Share Posted September 4, 2006 I'm amazed that the name their backs were not sequined... they decided not to go for the sequined version as it might have attracted too many of the Sydney Swans fans away from Aussie Rules Football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now