Jump to content

Gunmen try to kill Libya's recognized prime minister


webfact

Recommended Posts

Gunmen try to kill Libya's recognized prime minister
RAMI MUSA, Associated Press

BENGHAZI, Libya (AP) — Gunmen tried to assassinate Libya's internationally recognized prime minister on his way to the airport in the eastern city of Tobruk on Tuesday, a spokesman for his government said.

Arish Said, head of the government's media department, said that Prime Minister Abdullah al-Thinni's motorcade was attacked and one of his guards was lightly wounded but that there were no fatalities.

"They managed to escape," Said said.

Prior to the attack, he said armed men who had been protesting outside a session of the Tobruk government's House of Representatives tried to storm the building, firing shots into the air and demanding al-Thinni be removed from office.

They were "threatening to kill the prime minister and force the House to sack him," Said said. He identified the men as being funded by "corrupted political financiers" linked to powerful Tobruk tribal leaders, without elaborating.

The session was postponed until next week before the attempted assassination.

Nearly four years after the ouster of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi, Libya is consumed by chaos. The country split is between an elected parliament and weak government, and a rival government and parliament in Tripoli set up by the Islamist-linked militias that took control the capital, forcing the government to relocate to the far eastern cities of Tobruk and Bayda.

The turmoil has enabled the rise of an active Islamic State branch, which now controls at least two cities along the country's coastline.

Before the assassination attempt, a leader from Tobruk's dominant Obiedi tribe, Faraj Abu Alkhatabia, threatened al-Thanni on private broadcaster Libya Awalan.

"This prime minister must resign, if he doesn't I will smash his head," he said, adding that "either he leaves or we won't let the house of representatives stay in Tobruk."

A national security adviser to the Tobruk government, who declined to comment for fear of retribution, linked the threat to powerful Tobruk businessman and oil magnate Hassan Tatanaki, a member of the same tribe who owns the Libya Awalan television station.

"This morning the prime minster spoke with the head of the house of representatives regarding the pressure applied by Libyan tycoon Tatanaki who wishes to be appointed foreign minister." Tatanaki's office could not be immediately reached for comment.

Earlier Tuesday, Human Rights Watch said civilians, including foreign nationals, are trapped in several neighborhoods in Libya's embattled eastern city of Benghazi, urging fighters there to let them depart without conditions.

In a statement, the U.S.-based group says militias and army units have surrounded the downtown areas, where several hundred people are reportedly trapped and not allowed to leave. Some of those trapped were Syrians, Palestinians, and Asian and African nationals.

Middle East and North Africa director Sarah Leah Whitson said that all forces involved must take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian property, and that the Libyan army and militias must allow civilians safe passage and facilitate access to badly needed aid.
___

Associated Press writer Brian Rohan contributed to this report from Cairo.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-05-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a crying shame that precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian property werent taken nearly four years ago when it was decided that the country had to be torn apart with the only thing (person) that was holding it together removed.

For the good of the people of course, nothing to do with oil and money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a crying shame that precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian property werent taken nearly four years ago when it was decided that the country had to be torn apart with the only thing (person) that was holding it together removed.

For the good of the people of course, nothing to do with oil and money.

There is the question isn't it ? - is it better for people to be controlled by fear or to live in freedom ?.

We all thought the latter. Then when they were given freedom, they turned to murdering each other in a hundred different sects, all full of medieval scumbags ready to kill everyone else for power with the weapons they have been given.

The problem is that people in the West are conditioned by political correctness to think everyone is the same and will all do what is right if they have the option.

Now we have one major <deleted> with no solution in sight. I don't think are actually is a solution : if you watch online videos of rebels / freedom fighters or whoever from this region, they are all screaming 'Allah Akbar' all the time. Is it possible to reason with religious fanatics who are driven by base desires like greed ?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a crying shame that precautions to minimize harm to civilians and civilian property werent taken nearly four years ago when it was decided that the country had to be torn apart with the only thing (person) that was holding it together removed.

For the good of the people of course, nothing to do with oil and money.

There is the question isn't it ? - is it better for people to be controlled by fear or to live in freedom ?.

We all thought the latter. Then when they were given freedom, they turned to murdering each other in a hundred different sects, all full of medieval scumbags ready to kill everyone else for power with the weapons they have been given.

The problem is that people in the West are conditioned by political correctness to think everyone is the same and will all do what is right if they have the option.

Now we have one major <deleted> with no solution in sight. I don't think are actually is a solution : if you watch online videos of rebels / freedom fighters or whoever from this region, they are all screaming 'Allah Akbar' all the time. Is it possible to reason with religious fanatics who are driven by base desires like greed ?.

The problem with that is that it wasn't about freedom from oppression that Gaddafi was removed it was all about oil and defending the almighty dollar.

The hollier than thou freeing the Libyan people from oppression was only the excuse given to make it acceptable to the masses.

If what I have read is correct, under Gaddafi Libya had the highest per capita income and the best education and health systems on the African continent. Some may say that may not have been difficult, however : The problem arose (he stopped being a friend) when he suggested that (his) oil should be traded in gold and was getting some support for the idea.

Had things been left alone by the meddlers then Gaddafi would have put down the rebels in short order, even with outside support he was getting on top of them so air strikes were needed to ensure the tankers waiting offshore for the rebels to take over the refineries did nor wait in vain.

As you are correctly point out we are now seeing the result of that, and not the only place in the world we see similar results from similar actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""