Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

NLA meets to decide fate of 248 MPs

10-8-2558-10-11-58-wpcf_728x390.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The National Legislative Assembly (NLA) is holding a meeting to decide the fate of the 248 former MPs over their illegitimate amending of the draft charter regarding the composition of the Senate this morning.

The meeting started at 10.00 am today with only representative of the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC), the accuser, given chance to speak in closing the case.

After the closing statement by the NACC representative, the NLA will vote to impeach the accused MPs.

If they are impeached, they will face five-year ban in politics.

(Photo : Thai PBS File)

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nla-meets-to-decide-fate-of-248-mps

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-08-13

Posted

If reform would be seriously implemented any culprit should be barred for life from entering public service.

Posted

How ironic.

The 248 MP's who did not allow the DEM's to debate this under a democratic govt are allowed a chance to speak in closing the case under a Junta led govt with both having already made up their mind which path will be followed.

At least the Junta put on a facade of democracy.

Posted

How ironic.

The 248 MP's who did not allow the DEM's to debate this under a democratic govt are allowed a chance to speak in closing the case under a Junta led govt with both having already made up their mind which path will be followed.

At least the Junta put on a facade of democracy.

Did you even bother to read the OP?

Is the sun shining in Jamie Land?

Posted

How ironic.

The 248 MP's who did not allow the DEM's to debate this under a democratic govt are allowed a chance to speak in closing the case under a Junta led govt with both having already made up their mind which path will be followed.

At least the Junta put on a facade of democracy.

You generally spout nonsense, but in this case the OP is only 3 lines, one of which is:

The meeting started at 10.00 am today with only representative of the National Anti Corruption Commission (NACC), the accuser, given chance to speak in closing the case.​

More nonsensical than usual...

I know we should not get personal in this forum, but I have to ask these questions:

1) Do you actually speak like this in real life?

2) If so, do you have any friends at all?

Posted

How ironic.

The 248 MP's who did not allow the DEM's to debate this under a democratic govt are allowed a chance to speak in closing the case under a Junta led govt with both having already made up their mind which path will be followed.

At least the Junta put on a facade of democracy.

Utter rubbish as usual from this troll.

Let's not leave anything out. Remember the topic which was to be debated was whether to have a fully democratically elected senate. And the "democratic party" was against having a democratically elected senate but wants it to be chosen by the elites not the people.

Posted

An appointed assembly judging people who are against the principle of appointing members of assemblies.Isn't there a conflict of interest? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...