Turkish Suspect Denies Involvement in Erawan Bomb Attack

[NeilSA1]

So, their 'bomber' only now denies involvement, or , are we only informed now, that he refutes the charges?

[Thai at Heart]

Ooooops

Looking at his face I have always had a feeling that probably this guy is not responsible for the recent Bangkok bombing.

It looks as if he is innocent.

There is an international ring of human traffickers in Thailand, now some refugees from Iraq and Syria want to relocate to other countries including Thailand but Thailand will not accept them officially.

Probably he is one of such refugees...

Indeed, spotting someone telling the truth gets quite easy in this story because 99% of the people are lying.

[oneday]

"...the broker paid to smuggle him from Turkey..."

So according to the full article he was just passing through on his way to Malaysia...and I supposed he never saw any suspicious bomb making material.

Edited September 15, 2015 by oneday

[yuv06]

BS then why the hell was he using the cell phone on the day of the bombing at the bomb site.

[yuv06]

Well the masterminds trying to discredit the government and disrupt the tourist industry must be really pissed as it seems Thailand will record it's highest ever tourist arrivals this year

http://www.eturbonews.com/63740/thailand-set-record-tourism-year?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Eturbonews-TravelAndTourismIndustryNews+%28eTurboNews+-+for+the+global+travel+professional%29

[halloween]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

[Oziex1]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

[yuv06]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

So a guy found living in a flat full of bomb making materials is an illegal immigrant is not convincing?

Another guy with his finger prints all over the bomb making material and has confess to handing the bomber the backpack isn't convincing?

[Oziex1]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

So a guy found living in a flat full of bomb making materials is an illegal immigrant is not convincing?

Another guy with his finger prints all over the bomb making material and has confess to handing the bomber the backpack isn't convincing?

What is not convincing is anything and everything that is said by the Thai authorities.

The vague and contradictory statements from various leaders of police and army are confusing and lack credibility.

Many posters here have rightly asked why the most simple questions are not being answered by the authorities, answers that would fill in the gaps of a story so incomplete as to leave many of us with great doubt as to whether the authorities have a case against the accused or not. Are they bombers, people smugglers, Turks or Chinese.

Have the Thai interrogators pursued the reasons for the attack, the only news we have of this was speculation that it was revenge for deportation of Uygurs or by people traffickers.

They just haven't provided the information that makes their case add up IMHO.

[soalbundy]

why would he want to be smuggled from Turkey ? He is a Turkish national and so would have a valid passport, something wrong here

I believe he is not a Turkish national.

Even the Turkish embassy in Thailand has the same opinion.

He may be one of the refugees from Syria or Iraq.

In Turkey they can buy a Turkish passport for US$ 600.-

The article reports him as being a Turkish national, if that is true he had no need to be smuggled anywhere

[Barin]

why would he want to be smuggled from Turkey ? He is a Turkish national and so would have a valid passport, something wrong here

I believe he is not a Turkish national.

Even the Turkish embassy in Thailand has the same opinion.

He may be one of the refugees from Syria or Iraq.

In Turkey they can buy a Turkish passport for US$ 600.-

The article reports him as being a Turkish national, if that is true he had no need to be smuggled anywhere

As far as I know the Turkish Embassy in Thailand denied this fact.

Probably his Turkish passport is a fake (in Turkey the refugees can buy a Turkish passport for just US$ 600.-)

It has been reported in the media.

[yuv06]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

So a guy found living in a flat full of bomb making materials is an illegal immigrant is not convincing?

Another guy with his finger prints all over the bomb making material and has confess to handing the bomber the backpack isn't convincing?

What is not convincing is anything and everything that is said by the Thai authorities.

The vague and contradictory statements from various leaders of police and army are confusing and lack credibility.

Many posters here have rightly asked why the most simple questions are not being answered by the authorities, answers that would fill in the gaps of a story so incomplete as to leave many of us with great doubt as to whether the authorities have a case against the accused or not. Are they bombers, people smugglers, Turks or Chinese.

Have the Thai interrogators pursued the reasons for the attack, the only news we have of this was speculation that it was revenge for deportation of Uygurs or by people traffickers.

They just haven't provided the information that makes their case add up IMHO.

Yes and the latest arrest of the 3 student who 1 was the person that kicked the bomb into the canal.

Another thing you forgot is these guys got their money from Turkey through the Thai lady that rented the apartment out to these guys.

So if this was the same situation in the USA they just let them go as per what you mentioned?

[ianf]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

So a guy found living in a flat full of bomb making materials is an illegal immigrant is not convincing?

Another guy with his finger prints all over the bomb making material and has confess to handing the bomber the backpack isn't convincing?

What is not convincing is anything and everything that is said by the Thai authorities.

The vague and contradictory statements from various leaders of police and army are confusing and lack credibility.

Many posters here have rightly asked why the most simple questions are not being answered by the authorities, answers that would fill in the gaps of a story so incomplete as to leave many of us with great doubt as to whether the authorities have a case against the accused or not. Are they bombers, people smugglers, Turks or Chinese.

Have the Thai interrogators pursued the reasons for the attack, the only news we have of this was speculation that it was revenge for deportation of Uygurs or by people traffickers.

They just haven't provided the information that makes their case add up IMHO.

If it was simply an act of revenge, then they must be very highly organized! No way! It's what the masterminds want you to believe but don't fall for it.

[yuv06]

What is not convincing is anything and everything that is said by the Thai authorities.

The vague and contradictory statements from various leaders of police and army are confusing and lack credibility.

Many posters here have rightly asked why the most simple questions are not being answered by the authorities, answers that would fill in the gaps of a story so incomplete as to leave many of us with great doubt as to whether the authorities have a case against the accused or not. Are they bombers, people smugglers, Turks or Chinese.

Have the Thai interrogators pursued the reasons for the attack, the only news we have of this was speculation that it was revenge for deportation of Uygurs or by people traffickers.

They just haven't provided the information that makes their case add up IMHO.

So in the USA the police would inform the public details of everything regarding an on going investigation?

That Thai women living in Turkey is pretty rich transferring a million Baht to these guys I guess the money is for going pubbing

[FritsSikkink]

Isn't this the guy that refused to say anything for days? How long did it take him to make up this little story?

If the Thais cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that he is the bomber or had a role in the attack, he walks. It is called justice.

So far the Thais have said nothing convincing on the details of those they hold up as being involved, too much disjointed conjecture.

they found him with bomb making material, he will not walk

[Oziex1]

The point I'm making is that I do not believe any of what we are being told.

Not a word of it!

[yuv06]

Only God can help he created fools and he is the only one that can undo that

[lovelomsak]

The point I'm making is that I do not believe any of what we are being told.

Not a word of it!

I am with you I cannot believe a word of what is said by any and all evolved investigating this. Seems conjecture fabrication and scapegoats are the norm.