Jump to content

Is the wheel of Ayudhaya turning full circle on us?


Recommended Posts

Posted

TELL IT AS IT IS
Is the wheel of Ayudhaya turning full circle on us?

Pornpimol Kanchanalak
Special to The Nation

BANGKOK: -- Twice in its 416-year history (AD1351-1767), the kingdom of Ayutthaya became a vassal state of Burmese overlords. The first period lasted between 15 and 20 years, the second 10 months.

The second capitulation was "deja vu all over again", to use a phrase coined by late American baseball legend Yogi Berra, as vicious internal division once again resulted in the kingdom's downfall. It is not stretching the truth to say that Ayutthaya imploded long before the Burmese arrived on the scene.

During the first 233 years of the early Ayutthaya period (AD1351-1564), the kingdom was not a unified state, but a patchwork of self-governing principalities and tributary provinces ruled over by royal families that comprised the central governing body. Four principal governing dynasties controlled the seat of power. With little trust between them, they fell out and fought each other ferociously. Palace intrigues, assassinations and carnage abounded. Continuous internal fighting for control plagued the entire two centuries of the early Ayutthaya period, and the kingdom became progressively enfeebled as a result.

By the time the Burmese army arrived in 1564, the situation was already ripe for a foreign takeover. Some Thai factions even welcomed the foreign invaders, hoping that by their hand they could take revenge upon their troublesome kin.

If anybody was to blame for that momentous defeat, it would chiefly be Thais. We did it to ourselves.

The second Ayutthaya period (AD1584-1767) saw the kingdom become more centralised as the lesson from the mistake of the early period was learned. But that couldn't save us from ourselves. During the years after King Naresuan's reign, Ayutthaya became enormously prosperous as foreign trade climbed to become the kingdom's top revenue earner.

Yet the centralisation that forged the stability that lead to prosperity during the early years of this period eventually proved to be a curse as well as a blessing. When the centre became fragile and crumbled, the rest of the kingdom tumbled.

Between 1584 and 1767, power struggles within the ruling body and between rival factions became the norm as they vied for control of the country's enormous wealth. Once every 14 or 15 years, there would be violent upheaval in the country's ruling line. And each abrupt power seizure would sweep away the ruling elite along with the bureaucrats and government officials associated with the defeated house. The result was disruption of government and a diminishing number of capable bureaucrats and military personnel.

It is fair to say that Ayutthaya's glorious prosperity during that time was a mere deception. Under that shiny golden image lay a decaying centre, weakened by internal strife. That the rot did not lead to the kingdom's destruction sooner was only because our foreign foes had their own internal problems and couldn't muster the financial or military wherewithal to hurt us.

The foreign trade made gathering wealth an obsession for government bureaucrats, who increasingly became more interested in stuffing their own pockets than in development for the country as a whole. Cronyism, impunity, corruption, back-stabbing, power-grabbing by any and all means, and downright savagery dominated the scene in Ayutthaya prior to its fall.

Once again, the kingdom's warring factions sought foreign alliances to enhance their chance of outmanoeuvring rivals at home.

Historians agree that the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767 was caused primarily by our own internal discord, which rendered the government and the army extremely unstable and weak. The rulers during that time were more concerned with their own schemes than they were with the national interest. Fascinated by the alluring gleam of gold and silver, they were unable to see the disintegration of the nation. Some would claim that they did realise national disaster was coming, but were indifferent as long as they felt their wealth and power base would remain intact or even be enhanced.

Ayutthaya at that time was like a termite-ridden tree ready to fall, with or without a push.

When King Taksin liberated the state from Burmese rule 10 months later, he was not met by a cheering old guard. The old rulers acknowledged the fact he had fought to win back Siam's sovereignty, but they also saw him as a contender for power. As such, Taksin was the subject of numerous assassination attempts.

Fast forward to the present day and we discover that history is repeating itself. Unity can't be found anywhere. People are desperate for their own voice to be heard but are not willing to listen to the voice of others. People are demanding democracy, but few care about the real hardships that befall the poor and underprivileged people living on the fringe. We can't do anything to stop the drought brought upon us by El Niño, but at least we could try to roll up our sleeves and work together, forgetting our political hang-ups and instead focusing efforts on helping those in real need.

Once again, certain Thai factions are unscrupulously using foreign powers to squeeze their perceived "enemy", who is none other than their own kin. We talk about democracy without really understanding what it really is all about, but simply because it brings self-satisfaction. Democracy has been used as a tool for power-grabbing, not as a set of principles that ensure basic liberty.

To answer the question of how the country might heal before it brings about its own demise, we might take a phrase from the speech Barack Obama gave on his inauguration as US president: "When we put our shoulders to the wheel of history, it moves. It moves. It moves forward."

Those of us who sincerely want the best for our country should put our shoulder to the wheel.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Is-the-wheel-of-Ayudhaya-turning-full-circle-on-us-30270507.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-10-09

Posted

Though I was reading a historical novel then. Finally the nation gets to its point at the end. So another theory from the nation?

Posted

Good article, finally. But it simply tells me what I already know: Thais hate each other. No one wants to listen to each other's opinions and corruption with greed is part of it all. coffee1.gif

Posted (edited)

Good article IMO. It's not the Burmese that the Siamese have to worry about this time, it's the powerful neighbour to their North.

Edited by Toknarok
Posted

"We talk about democracy without really understanding what it really is all about, but simply because it brings self-satisfaction."

Finally, you've hit the nail on the head.

It's 2015, you've had worldwide internet access for a long time now, and you still have no idea what freedom or democracy actually mean or how they apply to the real world.

But hey, your scores on Gummi Drops are ranking right on up there and your pics of food are always a joy to see!

Posted

Though I was reading a historical novel then. Finally the nation gets to its point at the end. So another theory from the nation?

It was an excellent article. You should have seen where this article was going from its outset. Drawing parallels between the past and present can be a very effective means of raising awareness.

Posted

Though I was reading a historical novel then. Finally the nation gets to its point at the end. So another theory from the nation?

It was an excellent article. You should have seen where this article was going from its outset. Drawing parallels between the past and present can be a very effective means of raising awareness.

so that's why there's been 19 coups then since 1932?

Posted

Interesting analogy, however I doubt the Burmese are coming again, except as slave labor on the boats and factories.

But with a country locked in internal struggles, others might see opportunities in the political divisions to exploit business and resources. The Burmese army previously took all the statues and gold back to Burma, now it might be factories, jobs, tourism and technology that will be moved abroad.

Posted

Great article, but completely misses the well known root cause of Ayudhaya's downfall: a lack of submarines to defend the early Kingdom.

Posted

Interesting history lesson there but surely the circumstances of King Taksin's death should be included to give a fuller understanding of the period.

Thailand needs to stop looking to the past and move to the future. It is the feudalism and patronage systems of long gone years that are still holding Thailand back today.

Posted

Great article, but completely misses the well known root cause of Ayudhaya's downfall: a lack of submarines to defend the early Kingdom.

Post of the day! I almost fell over laughing!

Posted

Great article, but completely misses the well known root cause of Ayudhaya's downfall: a lack of submarines to defend the early Kingdom.

and a useless aircraft carrier (without aircraft) permanently attached to a wharf

Posted

It is usually 'the enemy within' that ultimately causes empires to fall...or. it could be the aliens who come from Mars, cavort for awhile then get bored and leave....blah, blah, blah....quoting a monster like Obama, who represents and promotes the corrosive U.S. ENEMY WITHIN, full time, is hysterical.

We know that America is in serious decline; we will be assured of its eventual collapse when American Football is replaced by Soccer, that idiot game where no one can use their arms....European 'futbol' fans = proof positive that god is either dead-or a failed Lesbian; now, Rugby, there's a sport. IMO and of course, YMMV.

Posted

Good article, finally. But it simply tells me what I already know: Thais hate each other. No one wants to listen to each other's opinions and corruption with greed is part of it all. coffee1.gif

For a moment reading this article I thought they were talking about present day Thailand. The above poster speaks the truth. The country has really stood still although advancing 100's of years in time. The sooner the rich realize that they must share their prosperity the faster the country will truly advance. Repeating myself yet again we live in a world of eternal GREED and this monster will someday consume us all.

Posted

Good article, finally. But it simply tells me what I already know: Thais hate each other. No one wants to listen to each other's opinions and corruption with greed is part of it all. coffee1.gif

The masses are too stupid to understand the view point of the other side, they just assume because they think they're doing what's best for the nation, that anyone who opposes them is trying to destroy it.

The reality is it's just elites on either side trying to vie for power using the masses as pawns. The sad thing about it is the masses aren't being manipulated through force or oppression, but rather through their own greed. Thailand has the leadership it deserves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...