accident

[IMHO]

I think you have an overly naive grasp of video as evidence....Regardless of what kind of lens you use.

For all you guys that are convinced you'll be ruled in the wrong no matter what, I offer you this link:

http://www.lazada.co.th/catalog/?q=drivepro

You need it.

then you have visual proof it was your fault too.......trouble with video is that it isn['t waht you SEE...it's what you CAN"T SEE that is usually important and .remember the police or law will decide what they see in your video....

Seriously, with 2 of these (1 front, 1 back) there's not much you're missing out on... that's up to 340 degrees of coverage, with a "blind spot" that's pretty negligible, considering you're normally moving.. and if you're stationary, how could it be your fault?

I have no idea what you're fishing at, but 1,050,000 Youtube videos can't be wrong

You appear to be of the school of thought that says "if it's on the net, then it must be true"- not impressed by this school

Not very impressed by your analytical skills there

Yes, I was referring to 1.05M dashcam videos on Youtube, which is a website you access on the 'net', but my school of thought isn't as you've posited at all - rather, in this case it's more a case of "seeing is believing" or "the proof is in the pudding"

Or, perhaps you're trying to suggest that 1.05M videos, that very clearly demonstrate fault in most instances, have been doctored?

[steven100]

you tell everyone ' please discuss it with my insurance representative Mr ........... ......... here's his number, thank you. '

[Tywais]

Off topic posts removed.

[Cook my sock]

If it's not your fault don't give anything. Once you start being generous it'll be seen as taking some blame. Then you're in a load of shit

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk