Jump to content

Obama extends US military mission in Afghanistan into 2017


Recommended Posts

Posted

Obama extends US military mission in Afghanistan into 2017
By JULIE PACE

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama on Thursday abandoned his pledge to end America's longest war, announcing plans to keep at least 5,500 U.S. troops in Afghanistan when he leaves office in 2017 and hand the conflict off to his successor.

It is another setback for the president in his quest to extricate the U.S. from more than a decade of war in Afghanistan and Iraq. That goal was already tarnished by the return of U.S. forces to Iraq last year to help fight the Islamic State, a military mission Obama has said will likely outlast his presidency.

Now, the winner of the 2016 presidential election will also become the third American commander in chief to oversee the Afghan war.

"I know many of you have grown weary of this conflict," Obama said, addressing the American people in remarks from the White House. "As you are all well aware, I do not support the idea of endless war."

But he added, ""I am firmly convinced that we should make this extra effort."

The president had originally planned to withdraw all but a small embassy-based force from Afghanistan at the end of next year, shortly before leaving office. Under the new $15 billion-a-year plan, the U.S. will maintain its current force of 9,800 through most of 2016, then begin drawing down to 5,500 late in the year or in early 2017.

His decision thrusts the war into the middle of a presidential campaign that so far has barely touched on Afghanistan. Candidates now will be pressed to say how they will try to do what Obama could not — end a conflict that has killed more than 2,230 American service members and cost more than $1 trillion.

On Thursday, leading Democratic candidates were silent about the president's decision, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, who served as Obama's secretary of state. Last year, after Obama announced his original 2016 withdrawal timeline, Clinton said she would be open to extending the U.S. presence if Afghan leaders made that request.

The president's revamped plan was welcomed by several Republican presidential candidates, but some said 5,500 troops would not be enough.

"If he is truly committed to fighting terrorism and securing a stable Afghanistan, he shouldn't short-change what our military commanders have said they need to complete the mission," said Jeb Bush. The former Florida governor did not say how many troops he thought would be sufficient.

According to a defense official, the president approved the highest number requested by commanders, with the greatest amount of flexibility.

Former technology executive Carly Fiorina called Obama's decision a "recognition of reality" in Afghanistan. And New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said the president was "waking up to the fact that disengaging America from the world and allowing there to be safe havens for terrorists is not the right way to protect American homeland security and national security."

Republicans have blamed Obama's decision to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq in late 2011 for creating a vacuum that allowed the Islamic State to thrive. The White House says the fault lies with an Iraqi government that marginalized minority Sunnis.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul was an outlier among Republican candidate. He vowed to remove U.S. troops from Afghanistan immediately if elected president.

U.S. officials say Afghan President Ashraf Ghani asked Obama to keep the troops in his country when they met in Washington earlier this year. Obama sees Ghani as a more reliable partner than former President Hamid Karzai, a mercurial leader who deeply frustrated the White House.

Obama's meeting with Ghani set off a months-long re-evaluation of the U.S. role in Afghanistan. Throughout, military leaders argued Afghans needed additional assistance and support to beat back a resurgent Taliban and keep the Islamic State from using the country as a haven.

The president's decision was reinforced when Taliban fighters took control of the key northern city of Kunduz late last month, leading to a protracted battle with Afghan forces supported by U.S. airstrikes. During the fighting, a U.S. air attack hit a hospital, killing 12 Doctors Without Borders staff and 10 patients.

The Associated Press reported Thursday that American special operations analysts were gathering intelligence on the hospital days before it was destroyed because they believed it was being used by a Pakistani operative to coordinate Taliban activity.

The U.S. forces that Obama spoke of on Thursday will continue with their current two-track mission: counterterrorism operations and training and assisting Afghan security forces. The troops will be based in Kabul and at Bagram Air Field, as well as bases in Jalalabad and Kandahar.

Ghani welcomed the decision, saying it sent a message to the Taliban and terrorist groups that their actions "will produce no result other than defeat."

Officials said the drawdown to 5,500 would begin late next year or in early 2017, with the pace determined by military commanders. They said NATO allies had expressed support for extending the troop presence in Afghanistan, but they did not outline any specific commitments from other nations.

Obama insisted he wasn't disappointed to know he'll leave office with a war he pledged to stop still underway. White House officials said they were still pleased with the progress Obama had made in drastically reducing the number of U.S. troops from a high of about 100,000 in 2010 and ending America's direct combat role.

Still, there's no doubt the situation he'll leave behind is far different from what he envisioned last year, when he announced it was time to "turn the page" and withdraw from Iraq.

"Americans have learned that it's harder to end wars than it is to begin them," he said.
___

AP writers Lolita C. Baldor, Jill Colvin, Catherine Lucey, Thomas Beaumont, Deb Riechmann and Lynne O'Donnell contributed to this report.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-10-16

Posted

The irony and hypocrisy of it all...just this past Sunday Obama was bumping his gums about how Putin was such a bad leader for sending troop into Syria...

I do not see how Russia sending troop to Syria is different than the US having troops in Afghanistan...

Obama appears to be loosing his confidence...shaken by Russian aggression...

Posted

Well, not overly surprising actually. Can you say military/industrial/financial complex? As long as there is a dollar to be sucked out of the US taxpayer for the profit of the boys they will carry on. Besides, they need to keep Americans at home in line by touting that they are continuing, with best efforts, an ever enlarging "terrorist war" that only they can keep the US safe. Safe to continue to pay more and more, adinfinitum, one supposes.

Unless the USG is planning to colonize and make Afghanistan a US State one can not really imagine an End Game that will work or even makes sense. This is really becoming a very bad macabre joke.

Posted

This travesty continues. Is there not one politician who can stand up to the US military establishment and say NO and stop this continual expenditure of billions of dollars while Americans continue to get poorer. America needs to get out of the Middle East. I could care less what the Russians do there. Let them waste their money on this nonsense.

Posted

I'd expect nothing less from the Nobel Peace Prize winner.

"War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength"

-INGSOC

Posted (edited)

Leaving vacuum is dangerous, the recent development showed that.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I don't think it will be a vacuum for very long.

The leaders that have stuffed their accounts with American money will be off to their villas in Dubai.

The army will turn and run like they did in Iraq.

I think the Taliban would resume full control within months of the US leaving.

So they might as well go now rather than waste more money and lives.

Edited by Chicog

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...