Jump to content

Civic group accuses CDC of being undemocratic in drafting process


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Civic group accuses CDC of being undemocratic in drafting process

BANGKOK: A CIVIC group complained yesterday that the current charter-drafting process is undemocratic and called on the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) to be more transparent about the draft's content.

The People's Council for Reform is also planning to set up an event for other civic groups to voice their opinions on the draft, saying the constitution belongs to the people and the country, not just some individuals or groups.

The council's representative Pairoj Polpetch, who is also a member of the Law Reform Commission of Thailand, said six points would be presented at the event, including political, labour and justice issues.

He also pointed out that the new charter should have at least the same provisions for people's rights and freedoms as in the 1997 and 2007 Constitutions, although he admitted little was known about the new charter so far.

Pairoj also accused the CDC of being undemocratic in its work, because even though it has been open to public comment and opinions, it has yet to disclose the charter's content.

Meanwhile, CDC spokesman Udom Rathamarut revealed yesterday that the new charter would not allow indirectly elected senators to campaign for elections. Instead, he said, candidates who have had at least two years experience in contributing to their professional group, would be voted in by members of the group they represent.

He said the CDC was aiming to ensure that all Senate candidates have played an active role in society and are engaged in their professional fields, adding that all profiles would be available for voters to examine.

As for concerns that the three-tier selection of senators - from district to provincial to national levels - could open the door to vote blocking, Udom admitted that was possible. However, he pointed out that with the set standards for qualification of candidates, electoral fraud would still be difficult.

Also, he said, social pressure would play a big role in ensuring that voters in each professional group choose the right person. After all, he said, voters would not accept a candidate not qualified for the position.

As for concerns that political investors will step in and support Senate candidates, he said it would be difficult to check which contestant has such backing. If he or she possessed the qualifications stipulated in the charter, then such an individual would be eligible to run in the election, he noted.

Udom also said that the Election Commission would examine each candidate's qualifications right from the district level before they can be allowed to campaign for votes.

In addition, he said, candidates should only be fielded by legal entities related to each professional group and this would be done based on their domicile in order to prevent the problem of one candidate running in multiple fields.

Asked if the new charter would block former senators from running in elections like they were by the 1997 and 2007 Constitutions, he said that he personally did not think this would happen because they were not involved in writing the new charter.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Civic-group-accuses-CDC-of-being-undemocratic-in-d-30274401.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-12-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought a democracy allowed for any person to put themself forward to represent a group of people no matter what race, religion, colour, social status, employment or age.

Placing any restriction, besides criminal history, as a prerequisite to being allowed to represent any group defeats the core value of what a democracy is.

The CDC may need to research the topic and the fundamental purpose of the issue they are deling with.

Edited by Reigntax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"candidates should only be fielded by legal entities related to each professional group." etc.

An insane set of restrictive rules that only prevent an open and free electorate to self-determination. CDC continues to approach the constitution as a roadmap to autocracy and not to democracy.

Congradulations go to Chairman Meechai in preserving the NCPO's political objectives and placing them ahead of the Thai People. wai2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you choose to believe NNT and CDC spokesman Udom Rathamarut, there has not been much negative feedback or opposition against the charter drafters’ direction (see http://news.thaivisa.com/thailand/cdc-not-yet-receiving-negative-feedback-on-charter-drafting/123645/).

Yet, here we have a report from The Nation that says the People's Council for Reform has complained that the current charter-drafting process is undemocratic and called on the CDC to be more transparent about the draft's content.

Apparantly, PRC feel so strongly about this that they are planning to set up an event for other civic groups to voice their opinions on the draft, saying the constitution belongs to the people and the country, not just some individuals or groups.

Unfortunately, it is hardly likely that PRC’s concerns will be heard, especially as Udom was reported in the NNT article as saying “after the first draft of the new charter is completed, the charter drafters will take more time to listen to public opinions and explain the content of the draft again”. Hardly a transparent process involving the people.

post-209291-0-61933000-1449376374_thumb.

As an amusing aside, in this report we also have Udom saying “voters would not accept a candidate not qualified for (a senate) position”, yet they have had no say in the selection of any members of the “five-rivers”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't need a democracy. In fact democracy can sometimes be mob rule.

The United States isn't a democracy.

But you're right, anyone should be able to assert himself for office and the people should choose their leaders.

technocracy? oligarthcracy surely not a peoplecracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 3,003

      Latest developments and discussion of recent events in the Ukraine War

    2. 447

      Blast from the Past - 60's, 70's, 80's,90's Music (2024)

    3. 13

      Can you defend yourself?

    4. 0

      UK Government Migrant Crisis to Intensify Pressure on Anti-Smuggling Efforts

    5. 0

      U.S. News Leaders Raise Concerns Over Declining Press Freedoms

    6. 0

      North Korea's Tragic Floods: Executions Reported Amidst Widespread Devastation

    7. 0

      Kamala Harris’ Contradictions: A Campaign Without Conviction

    8. 0

      UK Considers Sending Prisoners to Estonia to Ease Overcrowding Crisis

    9. 0

      White House Condemns Tucker Carlson’s Interview with Holocaust Denier

    10. 0

      Trump's Proposed Mortgage Ban for Undocumented Immigrants Sparks Debate

    11. 0

      Trump Backs Elon Musk's Plan to Slash Government Spending

    12. 0

      Simple Nasal Drops Cut Cold Duration by 2 Days in Children

    13. 0

      Assisted Dying Debate Gains Momentum as MP Wins Ballot for Private Member’s Bill

    14. 13

      Can you defend yourself?

×
×
  • Create New...
""