Jump to content

Preah Vihear the hold-out issue with Cambodia: Thai editorial


Recommended Posts

Posted

EDITORIAL
Preah Vihear the hold-out issue with Cambodia

The Nation

Thailand’s military government should resolve the temple dispute before politicians get their hands on it again

BANGKOK: -- Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen's visit to Thailand last week signalled a normalising of bilateral ties, but it would be an exaggeration to say our relationship has been fully restored.


The primary obstacle is the lack of agreement on the disputed land adjacent to the Preah Vihear Hindu temple on our shared border. Until that issue is resolved, the temple remains closed to Thais. The matter is so sensitive, entailing sovereignty and nationalism, that there is a possibility at least of conflict arising anew.

Thailand's current military government sought to curb some of that nationalism by preventing activist Veera Somkwamkid from staging a protest during Hun Sen's visit. The issue of Preah Vihear was not raised for discussion when the countries' leaders met.

Instead, Thailand and Cambodia signed several pledges to cooperate in areas including economics, security, labour and social issues and will together encourage private enterprises to join hands across the border.

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha declared that the two countries will work together more closely as part of the integration of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, collaborating on many issues, most notably the trafficking of people.

The five pacts signed last week were a declaration on future joint efforts; memoranda of understanding on labour cooperation and the development of border-control facilities at Nong Ian in Thailand and Stung Bot in Cambodia; and agreements on employment and getting the Thai-Cambodia and Cambodia-Thailand Business Councils working together.

Two-way trade between our countries is worth $5 billion annually, with Thai shipments to Cambodia valued at $4.5 billion.

Now we are seeking to align efforts in security, trade, investment and border development.

In terms of security, it was agreed to expedite joint patrols along the border to combat illegal logging and enhance shared efforts against the trafficking of drug and people, as well as other trans-national crimes.

It would be wonderful if agreement could be achieved so easily on the issue of Preah Vihear, but this far more complicated matter has been festering since 1962. That year when the International Court of Justice ruled that the temple and its vicinity are Cambodian territory while leaving room for doubt about the exact delineation.

Thailand acceded to the decision, but conservative ultra-nationalists have since 2008 belaboured the issue, using it to sway political support. In backing Cambodia's bid that year to have the temple listed as a World Heritage site, the government was accused of striking a closed deal with Phnom Penh for its personal benefit.

In February 2011 another administration tried to block restoration work at the temple, triggering a military skirmish in the area. Two months later Cambodia asked the International Court to interpret its 1962 judgement so that the border in the temple's vicinity could be firmly established. In November 2013 the court confirmed that the entire plateau promontory on which Preah Vihear rests belongs to Cambodia.

That ruling came at the height of Thailand's political conflict, which only subsided with the military coup of May 2014. At that stage the two countries were preparing to implement the court's judgement.

The countries must re-delineate the area in accordance with what's known as the Annex I map, and do so "in good faith", as per the court's adjudication.

If Prayut and Hun Sen regard relations between their nations as normalised and improving, they need to push ahead on the Preah Vihear issue. Thailand's military regime is best suited to cure an historic wound and get this resolved. Otherwise, once its term ends and we return to democratic elections, politics is apt to seize the matter and exploit it further, with possibly bloody consequences.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Preah-Vihear-the-hold-out-issue-with-Cambodia-30275374.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-12-22

Posted

Another "tough issue" this 'government' is avoiding dealing with. When it 'came to power' it claimed that it would tackle problems which had been beyond civilian, democratically elected governments - er, like this (and corruption)....

Posted

A junta that seized power from a democratically elected govt negotiating on the alignment of Thailand's borders. Am I the only one who sees the can of worms this will open up in the future, not least the legitimacy of any decision reached?

Posted

The French screwed the Thais when they drew up the maps on the agreed border way back when.

The Thais made the mistake of not protesting immediately, then they got screwed buy the UN in the

first appeal of the border. It is too late now. Just disassemble the temple and re-assemble it on Thai

soil. Expensive/difficult but it could /should be done. Just my opinion. coffee1.gif

Posted

Make it joint custody, throw some money towards its renovation, split tourist money half and half. Easy!

The International Court of Justice ruled that the temple and its vicinity are Cambodian territory. Thailand acceded to the decision.

Why should Cambodia give up anything, especially for the sake of some Thai nationalists?

Posted

"Thailand's military regime is best suited to cure an historic wound"

Historically, Thailand's military has been the instigator of armed conflict in and around the site. Even during other junta-controlled governments. What is needed between Thailand and Cambodia is a political reconcliation, not military discourse.

Posted

The only controversial issue is with the LOS government thinking that it can get the temple back with out getting their ass kicked again.From my count from the 1970s its Cambodia four--Thailand zero.

Posted

"Thailand's military regime is best suited to cure an historic wound"

Historically, Thailand's military has been the instigator of armed conflict in and around the site. Even during other junta-controlled governments. What is needed between Thailand and Cambodia is a political reconcliation, not military discourse.

And each time Thailand got its axx kicked

Posted

Territorial issues are a hot button topic in Thailand - I am waiting to see Veera's head explode when the fine print of the Chinese railway comes out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...