ALLSEEINGEYE Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 then authorities should do their job by protecting the public from this nutter. No way should she be allowed on the streets (this is not her first incident apparently). The authorities should also make sure she is getting the proper treatment in an institution and not running amok in public. How long before she uses her car as a weapon and innocent people are killed? Easy for them to try and save face by blaming other people. Do you job and protect society!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Grumpy Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I hope I didn't click 'like' on any of those videos. *ponders 28 years in jail* Buddha bless Thailand, Land of the free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bannoi Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I do not believe that she has a certified mental disorder at all, she was clearly having a hi-so tantrum. She is rich so she believes she can do and she pleases. No accuses for such medieval, hi-so bad behaviour. She needs a hard slap around her big head. I quite agree I've just watched it searched on You Tube and there it was a spoilt conceited arrogant bigheaded cocky egotistical pompous stuck up vain woman throwing a tantrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Got far more important things in my life, than too look at a deranged guy How do you feel then about looking at this deranged woman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EyesWideOpen Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Haha really funny stuff. A mental disorder suddenly crops up after her insane tantrum ?? Guess the court system here is in major damage control after this video came out. So all the people who viewed the video, liked or shared it, and laughed their asses off at this standard " do you know who I am" hi-so tantrum video are now going to be prosecuted ?? Thai people, please rise up against this feudal nonsense....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramrod711 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Someone needs to get her one of those "Nut behind the wheel" bumper stickers. Couldn't possibly be more appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maingmoom Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 And to add to the level of stupidity that has been displayed up to now. The reason the judge was acting so disgracefully was that she reportedly did not take her medication. I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now Her Judging days were over two years ago when she had a similar turn as this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxLee Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The only way to stop the power of social media is to shut down the internet in Thailand..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) Then I'm assuming that the idiot in the white Honda blocking traffic in BKK and then attempting to deck a cop would have valid cause to sue all individuals sharing videos of the incident because it may hurt his reputation. What's wrong with this picture? If Thailand plans to go down this road, she better start building more jails. Edited January 23, 2016 by connda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) And to add to the level of stupidity that has been displayed up to now. The reason the judge was acting so disgracefully was that she reportedly did not take her medication. I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now "I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now" I wouldn't be so sure about that. Having all your mental faculties in order does not seem to be a prerequisite for obtaining senior public positions in this country. Actually, personality disorders such as narcissism and psychopathy seem to be a prerequisite to obtaining leadership roles world-wide. Nothing unique to the Land of Smiles. Edited January 23, 2016 by connda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... So I now assume that Chidchanok Paensuwan will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. Edited January 23, 2016 by connda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Familyaffairs Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Since she wasn't wearing a badge stating she is a mental case, how can anyone be prosecuted ? Imagine the ensuing rage if she is ever in a car accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schondie Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 That order will only trigger the Streisand Effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casindonet Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 But stable enough to be permitted to drive a car. Drive a car & be a judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torpedo1970 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 ah..... do as i say and not as i do springs to mind..... the law is for everybody else and not me..... TIT Thainessssssssss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTIRIOS Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 ....just when you thought that you had seen....and heard....everything.......??? ...who volunteered what information about whom....??? ...and is that the defense/justification of her actions..... ...and judge...or former judge.....can someone with such a 'condition' be deemed 'fit' to judge others??? ...very confusing.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fey Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 to afraid to comment, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 We, as officials of the Thai courts do not serve the people well. We are not impartial. We are compromised. We can be bought. We do cater to the government, and are perfectly willing to engage in politics, and to take politics into consideration, when coming to a decision in a case, such as what recently happened in the Dark Tao trial, when the B2 were framed for a crime they did not commit. Of course we do not like you to view us as that kind of person. We know the truth, but we don't want you to know. So, we really take offense when you portray us in an unfavorable light. This nut job associate of ours was a real exception. We would like to assure the public that she is the only one within the Thai judicial system who behaves badly. We encouraged her to continue taking her medication, but she stopped taking it anyway. When she does not take her medication she can be really difficult to deal with. So, please do not make fun of us. We are all very thin skinned, and very sensitive to criticism. Please take this into account. At least try to pretend that we are real civil servants, and take the well being of the public into account with our work. OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... So I now assume that Chidchanok Paensuwan will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. "........along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command............" She, the errant ex-judge, may be further offended by the fact that you referred to her as a Mr. However you could be forgiven for that had you only viewed her photos posted on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connda Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... So I now assume that Chidchanok Paensuwan will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. "........along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command............" She, the errant ex-judge, may be further offended by the fact that you referred to her as a Mr. However you could be forgiven for that had you only viewed her photos posted on the internet. Dooooh! Darn, I can't blame that on a mental disorder, just pathetically bad eyesight. Lol. Re-edit: So I now assume that spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Suebpong's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. I'm going to have to hire an editor in the future. Edited January 23, 2016 by connda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MockingJay Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) Another good one coming out of Thailand's "Human Rights Jokebox"... Instead of punishing the person who misbehaves, punish the persons who display her misbehavior in public. The logic behind that might be questionable to some foreigners who simply "no unnesetaenn' Thainett"... Edited January 23, 2016 by MockingJay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MockingJay Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... So I now assume that Chidchanok Paensuwan will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. "........along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command............" She, the errant ex-judge, may be further offended by the fact that you referred to her as a Mr. However you could be forgiven for that had you only viewed her photos posted on the internet. Dooooh! Darn, I can't blame that on a mental disorder, just pathetically bad eyesight. Lol. Re-edit: So I now assume that spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Suebpong's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. I'm going to have to hire an editor in the future. "You tink too mutt, Connda, you make peopen puat hua!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomwct Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 But stable enough to be permitted to drive a car. If so, Cancel her Drivers License permanently! If not, she's not Mentally Disabled! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northernphil Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 They should take her Driving Licence away from her ..................... if only they were brave enough to ask her for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... So I now assume that Chidchanok Paensuwan will now be charged under Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command who authorized the disclosure of this sensitive and lawfully protected information to the general public. Don't you love the circular logic presented here. I find it somewhat...fascinating. "........along with all individuals in Mr. Chidchanok's chain of command............" She, the errant ex-judge, may be further offended by the fact that you referred to her as a Mr. However you could be forgiven for that had you only viewed her photos posted on the internet. a crazy tom for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabothai Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Yet another example of how officials try to intimidate people who are engaging in free speech. There is no disclosure of medical information, other than by the court spokesperson. OK, so she has a mental disorder, which in the video shows she is not able to control her emotions... But she's allowed to drive ???.... The court had better hire a few lawyers. They incriminated themselves as it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LannaGuy Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I am sure this will be a loop hole in the law that Chalerm will abuse in the future. yup you could not resist hijacking another thread with your political rhetoric this thread is NOT ABOUT Chalerm now go back under your stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berybert Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Is this looney still working for the justice system ? The country has a mentally disturbed man in charge so I can see no reason as to why not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuanku Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Not allowed to be a judge - we have doubts about your judgement and ability to make good decisions Allowed to drive a car..............does not require you to have good judgement or make important decisions?! Bit of a blind spot here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) Whilst I don't agree with the threads of jail time, I do find it inappropriate how people have no respect for someone's privacy and hope something is done about that. Nowadays whatever you do, some idiot with a smartphone camera is nearby ready to post the video on Facebook, with no regards whatsoever of the privacy of the person in the video, I find that unacceptable. Oh and to the people attacking said judge and her ability to drive, mind your own business for crying out loud. Edited January 23, 2016 by sjaak327 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now