webfact Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Thirayuth says military junta fails in reforms after two years in powerBANGKOK: -- The military junta has not achieved its goal to reform the country although two years has passed, indicating it intends to leave the task to new elected government.This was what Mr Thirayuth Boonmee, a former student activist and now a lecturer at Thammasat University’s Faculty of Sociology and Anthropology said yesterday at a seminar on law, poverty gap and development organised by Thammasat University.The event was held to mark the birthday of Sanya Dharmasakti, the late chancellor of the university, and former prime minister.Thirayuth said the past two years after the National Council for Peace and Order came in power, it did not make achievement in its goal to reform the country as it had declared.He said the military junta was not determined to push through the reform task, but would rather pass it on to the new elected government.But he said although it did not achieve in the reform, it was still not too late to do it.He agreed when the military junta head said it needed 10-20 years to accomplish all proposed reforms.He urged the military to do the reform during the remaining time, saying it has power in hand.Passing the task to new government would not work as it is not strong enough to do so unlike the military junta which has sweeping power, he said.Regarding a five-year transition period to be overseen by an appointed Senate, Mr Thirayuth viewed the prime minister must have a good explanation for the public as to why he needs to prolong the NCPO’s hold on power.He said if the prime minister was determined for change, he should do right now, not five years from now.Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/content/158489 -- Thai PBS 2016-04-06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoenixdoglover Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Ah, a bit challenging in tone. Over to you, General. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoenixdoglover Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. In what world does this"rule" apply to an individual expressing his political opinions? If you want opposing opinions, consult the opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's not surprising the NCPO did not implement any reform as they never had any idea of the reforms they wanted to implement (as all the others who campaigned for "reform before election"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. Who said he didn't give the same attention to the other side?? In a democracy most people complain by voting against the rulers. Too bad that's not allowed, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgesAbitbol Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 You are so unkind : -they made the motosoi have a new jacket! -They put more clothes on the motor show pretty girls -They made a park in Hua Hin - they forbid red bowls - .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. A political party trying to reform the police, military, judiciary??!!! Yeah good luck. see how long they last if they tried that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 This guy contradicts himself several times in that OP Maybe he would rather the junta stay in power for the next 20 years lol, although he is right, it would take a very long time indeed to repair this country and no elected government has any willingness to do so - that is for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 This guy contradicts himself several times in that OP Maybe he would rather the junta stay in power for the next 20 years lol, although he is right, it would take a very long time indeed to repair this country and no elected government has any willingness to do so - that is for sure No elected Government could even attempt reform even if they wanted to. They would be thrown out quick smart if they did try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbthailand Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. Maybe you should read up on him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. This gentleman concerned was a prominent feature in the PDRC shutdown and thrown his support behind the "whistle revolution". Sometimes you need to do some goggling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 the prime minister must have a good explanation for the public as to why he needs to prolong the NCPO’s hold on power. Because he has the military might to do so. Clear enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowboat Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. Unlike you, he is living in the "now". Yingluck is the past. The good general needs to show he just didn't waste an entire country's time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. This gentleman concerned was a prominent feature in the PDRC shutdown and thrown his support behind the "whistle revolution". Sometimes you need to do some goggling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease. "Sometimes you need to do some googling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease." MUCH too late for that. Ladies and gentlemen, we have this month's clear winner of the "egg on face award". I give you: billd766 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 A Junta has not got the know how to achieve reforms , not unless you agree with their views, it is overloaded with military brass, that in itself is a major problem , the only reforms so far are self serving , for themselves , the people don't have much of a say and when they do , in a referendum, it will probably get the thumbs down , even though the Junta wont like it , a referendum result will show either way how popular they are with the people, .............................................. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prbkk Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's not surprising the NCPO did not implement any reform as they never had any idea of the reforms they wanted to implement (as all the others who campaigned for "reform before election"). Indeed. They articulated not a single idea about what reform meant other that chanting the tired old mantra about ridding Thailand of the Thaksin regime, endlessly, loudly, ad nauseum. Suthep, the mad monk, the beer woman, the drama-queen professor.....not a solitary concrete proposal between them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 (edited) It's not surprising the NCPO did not implement any reform as they never had any idea of the reforms they wanted to implement (as all the others who campaigned for "reform before election"). Indeed. They articulated not a single idea about what reform meant other that chanting the tired old mantra about ridding Thailand of the Thaksin regime, endlessly, loudly, ad nauseum. Suthep, the mad monk, the beer woman, the drama-queen professor.....not a solitary concrete proposal between them. The ONLY reform they ever wanted to implement was to make sure that any future election produces a weak government easily controlled by unelected people/them. All the rest is just so much <deleted>! Edited April 6, 2016 by MZurf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ib1b4 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 A Junta has not got the know how to achieve reforms , not unless you agree with their views, it is overloaded with military brass, that in itself is a major problem , the only reforms so far are self serving , for themselves , the people don't have much of a say and when they do , in a referendum, it will probably get the thumbs down , even though the Junta wont like it , a referendum result will show either way how popular they are with the people, .............................................. .As for the referendum it is possible it may have the same rules. ( threats ) That were part of the 2007 draft referendum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrrizzla Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. This gentleman concerned was a prominent feature in the PDRC shutdown and thrown his support behind the "whistle revolution". Sometimes you need to do some goggling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease. "Sometimes you need to do some googling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease." MUCH too late for that. Ladies and gentlemen, we have this month's clear winner of the "egg on face award". I give you: billd766 I love it when a knee jerker "BUT THAKSIIINNNNNN" poster gets egg on their face. I bet he wont show up in this thread again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It's not surprising the NCPO did not implement any reform as they never had any idea of the reforms they wanted to implement (as all the others who campaigned for "reform before election").Indeed. They articulated not a single idea about what reform meant other that chanting the tired old mantra about ridding Thailand of the Thaksin regime, endlessly, loudly, ad nauseum. Suthep, the mad monk, the beer woman, the drama-queen professor.....not a solitary concrete proposal between them. The ONLY reform they ever wanted to implement was to make sure that any future election produces a weak government easily controlled by unelected people/them.All the rest is just so much <deleted>! I find the OP highly farcical. A guy who campaigned for "reform before election" without any idea of reform,is now criticising the Junta (that took power in the name of reform without any idea of it either) for not implementing reform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thechook Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 You are so unkind : -they made the motosoi have a new jacket! -They put more clothes on the motor show pretty girls -They made a park in Hua Hin - they forbid red bowls - .... They declared farangs are harbouring ghosts in their homes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praematura Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 The situation is worse of course. Duh. You have the masses voting against the elites interests and then the elites seized power. The people of Thailand are not going to be disenfranchised no matter how much the Internet is restricted or how many members of the intelligentsia are silenced. This story does not end well and may lead to a seismic shift away from the quasi-feudal system that is in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuanku Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 It was all a translation issue. They used the wrong word when they said REFORM the country, They actually meant REGRESS the country. They have been doing splendidly at that and are almost back to the beginning of the last century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. In what world does this"rule" apply to an individual expressing his political opinions? If you want opposing opinions, consult the opposition. If you want to be biased only quote the side that YOU support. If you want to be fair quote both sides, the good and bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. Unlike you, he is living in the "now". Yingluck is the past. The good general needs to show he just didn't waste an entire country's time. Well at 11.14 pm on 06 April I am posting here which certainly means to me I am living in the "now". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Did the gentleman concerned say the same thing about the PTP government after 3 years? That is not bias but equalisation. If you complain about one side then you must give the same attention to the other side. This gentleman concerned was a prominent feature in the PDRC shutdown and thrown his support behind the "whistle revolution". Sometimes you need to do some goggling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease. "Sometimes you need to do some googling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease." MUCH too late for that. Ladies and gentlemen, we have this month's clear winner of the "egg on face award". I give you: billd766 I love it when a knee jerker "BUT THAKSIIINNNNNN" poster gets egg on their face. I bet he wont show up in this thread again. You lose once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 This gentleman concerned was a prominent feature in the PDRC shutdown and thrown his support behind the "whistle revolution". Sometimes you need to do some goggling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease. "Sometimes you need to do some googling before you catch the PM foot and mouth disease." MUCH too late for that. Ladies and gentlemen, we have this month's clear winner of the "egg on face award". I give you: billd766 I love it when a knee jerker "BUT THAKSIIINNNNNN" poster gets egg on their face. I bet he wont show up in this thread again. You lose once again. OMG, he can't be more than five years old! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrrizzla Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 LOL unless you're gonna at least admit your mistake you look very much a loser my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ib1b4 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 A Junta has not got the know how to achieve reforms , not unless you agree with their views, it is overloaded with military brass, that in itself is a major problem , the only reforms so far are self serving , for themselves , the people don't have much of a say and when they do , in a referendum, it will probably get the thumbs down , even though the Junta wont like it , a referendum result will show either way how popular they are with the people, .............................................. .As for the referendum it is possible it may have the same rules. ( threats ) That were part of the 2007 draft referendum?Well that did not take long . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now