Jump to content

Topless Farang Fined 100 Baht in Chiang Mai


webfact

Recommended Posts

Topless Farang Fined 100 Baht in Chiang Mai
By Pravit Rojanaphruk
Senior Staff Writer

14605348251460534959l.jpg
An unidentified foreign man stands with a police officer Wednesday morning at Chiang Mai police station.

CHIANG MAI — A foreign man was arrested and fined 100 baht in Chiang Mai for violating the junta’s ban on indecent dress while splashing water during the first day of Songkran.

Full story: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/detail.php?newsid=1460534825&typecate=06&section=

kse.png
-- Khaosod English 2016-04-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Foreign man arrested for being shirtless on Songkran
By Coconuts Bangkok

foreigner_arrested.jpg
Police must have found the bare, wet, male chest very sexy. Photo: Sanook

CHIANG MAI: -- Just so you know, Thai police regard nipples of all genders equally obscene.

A young foreign man was arrested in the middle of a water fight in Chiang Mai province today on a charge of obscenity after police saw him walking around shirtless.

The man, whose identity was not disclosed, was charged with public obscenity “by exposing himself to the public,” according to traffic officer Pol. Col. Piyapan Pattarapongsin.

Full story: http://bangkok.coconuts.co/2016/04/13/foreign-man-arrested-being-shirtless-songkran

cocon.jpg
-- Coconuts Bangkok 2016-04-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was this photo taken before or after the fine was paid ?

If after and the offender allowed leave still ' topless ' the BIB are condoning the offence and the publicity seeker on the right should, at least, be reprimanded.

However he's likely to be rewarded by the PM for upholding traditional Thai values by dealing with serious a serious case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if the police feel Jimmy's bare chest is obscene enough to warrant a fine, why have they 1) not covered him up to avoid offending onlookers and 2) allowed an "obscene" photo to be taken, published and distributed via the internet.

Shouldn't the RTP themselves now be charged with promoting obscenity and distribution of lewd material under the Computer Crimes Act.

The law should work both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if the police feel Jimmy's bare chest is obscene enough to warrant a fine, why have they 1) not covered him up to avoid offending onlookers and 2) allowed an "obscene" photo to be taken, published and distributed via the internet.

Shouldn't the RTP themselves now be charged with promoting obscenity and distribution of lewd material under the Computer Crimes Act.

The law should work both ways.

clap2.gif Spot On !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It addition to breaking the law themselves, this is nothing short of police harrassment. Why don't the police go stop real criminals: drunk drivers, marauding youths on motorcycles brandishing weapons, drug dealers, and the list goes on.

Strange there has been no crackdown on the "night spots." Oh wait!!! Most are owned and/or controlled by certain members society and of course promote traditional Thai culture and values.

Pathetic hypocrites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a major step in the right direction. Now if Thailand's finest would turn their attention to the open-sandal problem, the country would be well on the road to a thorough reversion to Buddhist standards.

In short, there are too many middle-aged farangs wandering around the provinces in open-toed sandals - with many of them displaying naked big toes for all to see!

The correct attire, as every sartorially-educated foreigner knows full well, is a pair of business socks - black or dark grey, it matters not - worn between the foot and the footwear, to cover the offending protuberances.

A modest fine of, say, 25,000 Baht in the first instance would soon stamp out this gross offence to Thai sensibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me see if I've got this right. The guy is charged with being "obscene" by merit of not wearing a shirt. Certainly, for any normal-thinking cops, priority would be given to cladding such an offensive sight as quickly as possible, but instead, they choose to give the press a photo op and actually become responsible for spreading this "obscene and offensive" image nationwide. After many years here, I still can't really get my head around Thai logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me see if I've got this right. The guy is charged with being "obscene" by merit of not wearing a shirt. Certainly, for any normal-thinking cops, priority would be given to cladding such an offensive sight as quickly as possible, but instead, they choose to give the press a photo op and actually become responsible for spreading this "obscene and offensive" image nationwide. After many years here, I still can't really get my head around Thai logic.

Oxymoron 1509777.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading that men would only be fined if they were "muscular" @500 baht... maybe why jimmy only fined 100? ... but really this is madness... No this is THAILAND... (recalling scene from movie "300")

Yeah! Well I guess it must go by weight then. But the last time I stepped on a Thai Weight Scale at the Doctors Office I bent there needle, so there must be a maximum fine for guys like me. But then if it went to court I would probably win also as I can't find a bra or swim suit top in Thailand to cover my nipples that could come anywhere close to fitting me. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the Middle Ages.

Soon, our ladies will be squabbling on the sale table for half priced veils and black gowns.

Freedom lasted about a century. Now my shirtless body is porn.

We need a time machine to take us back to Woodstock days...(ok..that was near my hometown, and not thailand). However, women's breasts were ok in public prior to 1940's. Now...75 years later, a man's chest is obscene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note how the second pic had even the back of his hand blurred?

He didnt even have "man boobs" from too much chicken (like me) so his supposedly offending "Na Ok" were incongruously not blurred.

One conclusion; nothing to show, but his face may have been very ugly. tongue.png

Remember the song, was it; --- "Nice body shame about the face"? That will do.

Other conclusions have been posted and more will come. Watch these spaces.rolleyes.gif

for example;-

This was a police warning and example to ladies who do have something beautiful to show.

So what would their fines be. Proportionately more? rolleyes.gif Just thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...