Jump to content
You are not logged in ▶️ Click to sign-up or login ×
ASEANNOW Official TikTok account is now LIVE! -Follow Us!

Should Corbyn Quit or Be Pushed, as Leader of the UK Labour Party ?

Ricardo

By Ricardo
in Home Country Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply
freebornjohn Apprentice Member

freebornjohn

Posted
Posted

Angela Eagle and Tom Watson are reported as having declared their intention to run for Leader of the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn has turned a deaf ear to the Blairite Labour MPs who have called for him to step down. The Chilcot Report on Britain's role in the Iraq War is due to be published on 6th July. If this report is anything more than a whitewash Tony Blair's name will be dragged through the mud, along with the integrity of those Labour MPs who still worship at his tainted shrine. The three-way contest for the Tory leadership between Johnson, May and Gove is about to explode into hot air. The most suitable candidate for the leadership of the Labour Party is, in my humble, and some might say radical, opinion: Jeremy Corbyn

Link to comment
Jip99 Platinum Member

Jip99

Posted
Posted

Angela Eagle and Tom Watson are reported as having declared their intention to run for Leader of the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn has turned a deaf ear to the Blairite Labour MPs who have called for him to step down. The Chilcot Report on Britain's role in the Iraq War is due to be published on 6th July. If this report is anything more than a whitewash Tony Blair's name will be dragged through the mud, along with the integrity of those Labour MPs who still worship at his tainted shrine. The three-way contest for the Tory leadership between Johnson, May and Gove is about to explode into hot air. The most suitable candidate for the leadership of the Labour Party is, in my humble, and some might say radical, opinion: Jeremy Corbyn

Corbyn just doesn't cut it.

But then it is academic because there is more chance of the UK rejoining the EU in the next 10 years than there is of seeing a Labour government.

Link to comment
elliss Platinum Member

elliss

Posted
Posted

The poor Brits. What a bunch of hopeless people.

your right im ashamed to be british

Does that mean , you will not be accepting any more payments , pensions etc , from Britain ?.

Bttopic , Corbyn being leader of the Labour party, ha ha, just about sums up the state of the party.

After the Blair and Brown fiasco. the Labour party , are finished .RIP.

Link to comment
Ricardo Star Member

Ricardo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Some Labour MPs appear to be trying for a negotiated settlement, for Corbyns' withdrawl.

" The BBC has learned that a delegation of shadow cabinet members tried to meet Mr Corbyn on Thursday to put forward their plan, but were unsuccessful.

Under the plan, potential leadership contenders would agree to pursue some of Mr Corbyn's key policies on issues including tackling inequality and making the party more democratic."

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36692256

Link to comment
nong38 Platinum Member

nong38

Posted
Posted

Corbyn was elected according to the new rules, which attracted a lot of members who wanted to install a duffer and thats what they got, but he was the winner and he will stay until he steps down or is brought down. Personally I dont rate him and he has little or now chance of being PM, it must be difficult for him to see what other people he gave jobs to treating him like this, the Labour Party is hardly united, it is hard to see how he can carry on but I expect him until the Labour Party Conference in September and then see what the ground looks like. Hilary Benn seems to have marked his card as a possible replacement and will no doubt just sit back and wait for the wheels to come off, hard to see any other candidate, unless, they play the Tory game of stopping the best candidate and installing someone "the Party" want and can control.

Link to comment
GuestHouse Diamond Member

GuestHouse

Posted
Posted

Let's see what Chilcot has to say this week before we completely right Corbyn off in favour of the remnants of the Blair camp.

It will be yet another waste of millions of pounds a complete and total whitewash as per usual

Perhaps we should read it first before we come to any conclusions. whistling.gif

Link to comment
Deepinthailand Advanced Member

Deepinthailand

Posted
Posted

Let's see what Chilcot has to say this week before we completely right Corbyn off in favour of the remnants of the Blair camp.

It will be yet another waste of millions of pounds a complete and total whitewash as per usual

Perhaps we should read it first before we come to any conclusions. whistling.gif

Why will it blame Blair in any way NO. Will it blame anyone NO. Will it's conclusions be binding NO. So another waste of the tax payers money YES.

Chilcot is a puppet his hands are tied so don't think for one minute he had a free rein. As usual nothing will be learnt and the smug bastard Blair will get away with murder.

Link to comment
vogie Platinum Member

vogie

Posted
Posted

The thing is the Labour party has not had a great leader for a long long time!! Nor has the Tory party for that matter..

They have had great leaders, but unfortunately they have not been chosen, a bit like Brian Clough for the England job.

Link to comment
Rancid Gold Member

Rancid

Posted
Posted

Angela Eagle MP has made a fresh appeal to Corbyn to resign, "for the good of the party and the country".

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36693835

Funny how politicians that say this are generally saying it for their own benefit, bigger the country & party.

Didn't realise Cornyn was originally pro leave, wonder why he turned the other way? One thing about him though, he was in the minority opposed to the disastrous invasion of Iraq.

Link to comment
Ricardo Star Member

Ricardo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Further discussion over this weekend appears to center round whether JC has the right to automatically appear on the ballot-paper, without needing to find sufficient (that is, 51) MPs/MEPs to nominate him.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36756975

" Labour's National Executive will decide later whether Mr Corbyn must seek fellow MPs' nominations for his name to appear on the ballot paper.

Union leader Len McCluskey has warned of "a lasting division" in the party if Mr Corbyn's name does not appear."

However Jeremy is reported to have seemed unconcerned, when speaking yesterday at the Durham Miners' Gala, claiming that there was no pressure on him whatsoever. Which appears a very odd thing to say, after the recent vote-of-no-confidence, and with an imminent leadership challenge. blink.png

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36754892

Link to comment
uksomchai Apprentice Member

uksomchai

Posted
Posted

Corbyn and his Momentum Jihadis are confusing Labour Members and Labour Voters. The vast majority of Labour Voters have never been nor ever will be Labour Members but they are the people who elect Labour politicians into Government. Now the vast majority of these politicians, councillors and MEPs have voted overwhelmingly for him to leave. The Momentum thugs may well be able to get this clown elected as the Labour leader but they are never going to get him elected as PM. He was elected to LEAD the Labour party and no matter which way you measure success he has failed utterly and completely to lead the party. If he stays as leader then the Labour party will suffer exactly what happened to Scottish labour and simply become an irrelevant party of protest, led by a career protest politician and never again a Government in waiting.

We are watching the slow death of the labour party. Killed by the Communists that have taken over the party thanks to that Muppet Ed Milibands parting gift

Link to comment
MissAndry Apprentice Member

MissAndry

Posted
Posted

Don't need to watch that. Very easy comparison. Blair a fool easily led made a wrong decision at the time but patriotic.

Corbyn a two faced liar, a traitor who wants nothing good for UK exept to help his IRA scum friends. Easy really

But completely wrong.

I actually wonder how anyone could have all the facts 180 degrees wrong.

Link to comment
Deepinthailand Advanced Member

Deepinthailand

Posted
Posted

Don't need to watch that. Very easy comparison. Blair a fool easily led made a wrong decision at the time but patriotic.

Corbyn a two faced liar, a traitor who wants nothing good for UK exept to help his IRA scum friends. Easy really

But completely wrong.

I actually wonder how anyone could have all the facts 180 degrees wrong.

In your opinion of course. I knew of Corbyn in the 70/80' when he hated and worked against the government in ways that if done 20 yrs before would have seen him hang. I've seen him laugh and clap with IRA murderers at deaths of British service. A leopard never changes it's spots, so please no preaching to me how good he is for the UK

Link to comment
MissAndry Apprentice Member

MissAndry

Posted
Posted

Don't need to watch that. Very easy comparison. Blair a fool easily led made a wrong decision at the time but patriotic.

Corbyn a two faced liar, a traitor who wants nothing good for UK exept to help his IRA scum friends. Easy really

But completely wrong.

I actually wonder how anyone could have all the facts 180 degrees wrong.

In your opinion of course. I knew of Corbyn in the 70/80' when he hated and worked against the government in ways that if done 20 yrs before would have seen him hang. I've seen him laugh and clap with IRA murderers at deaths of British service. A leopard never changes it's spots, so please no preaching to me how good he is for the UK

I think Corbyn is a total twonk, but not responsible for harming anyone.

Unlike the evil Blair who was directly responsible for the deaths of 500,000 people, just because he wanted to suck up to Bush.

Get real

Socialist Vs war criminal, one is harmless, one is evil.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...