Jump to content

"Lady Kai" 'away with the fairies', claims top cop


rooster59

Recommended Posts

But the day before she was smart enough to drive to phitsanulok on her own and went to Police there, to withdraw 4 other cases that she had accused others that were still under investigation. Smart enough to manipulate her victims. Who owns the nineteen passports which has been found in her house?

Where is her missing driver? Where is the other thai lady who is an owner of a condo went missing after she transferred ownership of the condo and land to an aide of Gai?

Who are her police friends and helpers? A fast full investigation looks different. Will be back backers protected and shielded?

Until now, there are no other arrested from this girl trading mafia.

Why not?

All serious criminals have mental problems, that is no excuse here for a special treatment, or a license for a 5 star sanatorium.

"Where is her missing driver? Where is the other thai lady who is an owner of a condo went missing after she transferred ownership of the condo and land to an aide of Gai?"

Look 6 foot under ground somewhere and you will probably find them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Why do foreigners cares so much about this case? Let Thailand sort out this on their own .

Maybe because any person that is interested in justice -- or just empathetic -- gets incensed when little girls (who could be your daughters age) are bullied into doing something against their will -- regardless of whether they are Thai or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lastest on her is that she had made a donation of 10 million baht to the military in the past as well as a donation of 10 million baht to something that had to do with the the Monarchy (not exactly sure for what) and both cheque were no good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Certified Clinical Psychologist, I deplore it when unqualified persons, such as police,the general public, or any others make statements that say a person is mentally unstable, mentally incompetent or any other commonly used terminologies or conditions that have not been verified by a professional. A lot of these remarks are often just based on hearsay, making a reference from other people's unsuited or incorrect remarks and/or taking a stance using mass media references which are often incorrect and not based on professional based facts and definitions. Case in point is when mass media use the terms "sociopathic and psychopathic" and everybody jumps and uses the same terms which are meaningless as they are not usually part of our vocabulary. The term sociopath is a name for a person who shuns society due to a personality disorder and psychopathy was used to describe a personality trait but is now used in reference to a particular antisocial personality disorder. Hannibal Lecter (sp?) does not fit either category. By the way, contradictory to common belief, we do not "certify" people as insane (or whatever) we certify people as sane when they are fit to re-enter society.

Edited by wotsdermatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Certified Clinical Psychologist, I deplore it when unqualified persons, such as police,the general public, or any others make statements that say a person is mentally unstable, mentally incompetent or any other commonly used terminologies or conditions that have not been verified by a professional. A lot of these remarks are often just based on hearsay, making a reference from other people's unsuited or incorrect remarks and/or taking a stance using mass media references which are often incorrect and not based on professional based facts and definitions. Case in point is when mass media use the terms "sociopathic and psychopathic" and everybody jumps and uses the same terms which are meaningless as they are not usually part of our vocabulary. The term sociopath is a name for a person who shuns society due to a personality disorder and psychopathy was used to describe a personality trait but is now used in reference to a particular antisocial personality disorder. Hannibal Lecter (sp?) does not fit either category. By the way, contradictory to common belief, we do not "certify" people as insane (or whatever) we certify people as sane when they are fit to re-enter society.

thank you for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...