"Please don't let me be a widow when I am still young" - Adult star "Nong Nat" waits at sick Harold's side

[giddyup]

5 minutes ago, autanic said:

 

Would Harold be as attractive to her, if he was deadbeat broke ?

 

Be honest - Not naive !

Would Donald Trumps missus? In fact, name any wealthy man with a beautiful wife and ask the same question. I know who's naive.

[autanic]

46 minutes ago, Merylhighground said:

 

Best post of the day.

 

Some (most, if not all) of the 'whore/prostitute' comments here come from men who were drawn to Thailand for that very thing, have probably married similar themselves.

They would probably faint if this lass approached them to replace Harold, should God-forbid, the worst happen; though seeing as Harold is/was a success in life and most of the hypocritical,  bitter, warped, old snipers on here, could only dream of calling themselves that, as they express such envy through their keyboards, that seems highly unlikely to happen.

I suppose they have to have their daily keyboard vent before expressing horror to their Thai/Chinese MBA wives whose high ranking army/police fathers own half of Bangkok...etc...keeps down the high BP I Understand.

 

 

This post makes no sense to me at all.  

 

You said MOST, IF NOT ALL, well I never call her a whore or a prostitute. I didn't read any other posts saying the same thing either. People called her a porn star, but that is not a prostitute or a whore that is an actress.

 

People come to Thailand for many reasons, the landscapes, the beaches, cheaper living, you assume people have come to Thailand to marry Prostitutes, in fact only a small percentage of Thailand's visitors actually marry bar girls, so once again you have made an incorrect assumption.

 

You go on to state, that people on here would faint, if this lass approached them to replace Harold. Are you suggesting, that once Harold is in the ground, that she would be on the look out for another , and I quote "hypocritical,  bitter, warped, old snipers", if so then it cannot be true love, but more of a financial arrangement.

 

This comment is the best though:  "I suppose they have to have their daily keyboard vent before expressing horror to their Thai/Chinese MBA wives whose high ranking army/police fathers own half of Bangkok...etc...keeps down the high BP I Understand."

I think you might want to adjust the medication your taking or you have a strange perception of the members of this board indeed.

 

 

Edited September 7, 2016 by autanic

[autanic]

4 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Would Donald Trumps missus? In fact, name any wealthy man with a beautiful wife and ask the same question. I know who's naive.

 

Exactly, she is only interested in him, because of his wealth so can we drop the pretence that she is the doting Wife, she claims to be. As soon as he is in the ground, she is in for a great payday and she knows it.  

[autanic]

6 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Would Donald Trumps missus? In fact, name any wealthy man with a beautiful wife and ask the same question. I know who's naive.

 

Yes Donald Trumps Missus would be attractive if she was rich or poor.

[giddyup]

1 minute ago, autanic said:

 

Exactly, she is only interested in him, because of his wealth so can we drop the pretence that she is the doting Wife, she claims to be. As soon as he is in the ground, she is in for a great payday and she knows it.  

You are making assumptions without knowing one thing about the financial situation. Give Harold some credit, he knows exactly what she is, he may or may not be looking after in a will, only he knows that.

[giddyup]

3 minutes ago, autanic said:

 

Yes Donald Trumps Missus would be attractive if she was rich or poor.

Don't dodge the question. Would Donald Trump have his beautiful wife if he was stacking shelves at a K Mart? Money buys you just about anything you want and that includes beautiful women.

[autanic]

1 minute ago, giddyup said:

You are making assumptions without knowing one thing about the financial situation. Give Harold some credit, he knows exactly what she is, he may or may not be looking after in a will, only he knows that.

 

I think it safe to assume, that he has some money.

I think it safe to assume he has assets in Thailand or elsewhere to which she is legally entitled being his Wife.  I do not know about Thailand, but in the UK, you do not need a will between Husband and Wife. Your will in effect was your legally bound marriage vows.  "All that I have, I give to you . . .".   SAME SAME, BUT DIFFERENT.

[autanic]

1 minute ago, giddyup said:

Don't dodge the question. Would Donald Trump have his beautiful wife if he was stacking shelves at a K Mart? Money buys you just about anything you want and that includes beautiful women.

 

This is a strange argument giddyup, when you agree entirely with me.  You win.

This was the point I made in my earlier post.

 

Let me spell it out.

 If you have money, then you can buy yourself a beautiful Wife. Women find rich men attractive. She is going to be rich when he dies as they are married, his money becomes her money.

[giddyup]

1 minute ago, autanic said:

 

I think it safe to assume, that he has some money.

I think it safe to assume he has assets in Thailand or elsewhere to which she is legally entitled being his Wife.  I do not know about Thailand, but in the UK, you do not need a will between Husband and Wife. Your will in effect was your legally bound marriage vows.  "All that I have, I give to you . . .".   SAME SAME, BUT DIFFERENT.

They have been married less than a year, good luck to her if she can manage to get her hands on half his money. If he has a will drawn up naming children or other people as beneficiaries, she would have to fight it out in a law court, and if the money is offshore somewhere, it could be a long battle.

[freebyrd]

2 hours ago, louse1953 said:

Maybe she will crowd fund for ICU bill for a chance to meet her personly.Would you?

 

Not my bag at all, walking manikins aren't for me. If she offered me money to do the necessary I would decline.

[giddyup]

9 minutes ago, autanic said:

 

This is a strange argument giddyup, when you agree entirely with me.  You win.

This was the point I made in my earlier post.

 

Let me spell it out.

 If you have money, then you can buy yourself a beautiful Wife. Women find rich men attractive. She is going to be rich when he dies as they are married, his money becomes her money.

Not necessarily. I can't speak for Thailand, but in Australia you can't be married for less than a year and walk away with all the assets, unless there's no other beneficiaries. I have been with the same Thai lady for 7 years, I have looked after her very well in my will, but she isn't the only beneficiary.

Edited September 7, 2016 by giddyup

[autanic]

4 minutes ago, giddyup said:

They have been married less than a year, good luck to her if she can manage to get her hands on half his money. If he has a will drawn up naming children or other people as beneficiaries, she would have to fight it out in a law court, and if the money is offshore somewhere, it could be a long battle.

 

The length of time you are married carries no weigh, in inheritance laws. I just checked a few things, any assets he has in Thailand will become hers. If he has children then they will be in all likelihood named in a will.

 

But in cases where no new will is drawn up, there are many cases that Marriage annuls any previous wills. This is why, most people make a new will to reaffirm what the children get after being married.

 

For instance in England, say you are unmarried and have a child and have a will stating all of your estate goes to the child.  Then you get married, the marriage is a contract that over rules a will. So you are in affect stating that all of your estate now belongs to you spouse. If you still want part of your estate to go to your child, then a new will has be lodged as the old was invalidated by the act of marriage.

 

Where a person's estate is held offshore or in other territories, then international convention states, "where the person is domicile", in this case he is domicile in Thailand, so all his assets would be dealt with by a Thai Court.  As stated earlier a Thai Court takes the sanctity of marriage very seriously as all Countries do and would award his Wife, the entire estate.  Collecting would be when lawyers were needed, but precedents have been set.

[autanic]

9 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Not necessarily. I can't speak for Thailand, but in Australia you can't be married for less than a year and walk away with all the assets, unless there's no other beneficiaries. I have been with the same Thai lady for 7 years, I have looked after her very well in my will, but she isn't the only beneficiary.

 

You can in the UK. 

 

But Harold is neither in Australia or the UK, he is domiciled in Thailand. Thai Law has Primacy.

 

You have made the intention, to look after your partner in your will as well as others. Perhaps Harold has done the same, if not she will inherit the lot.

Edited September 7, 2016 by autanic

[giddyup]

1 minute ago, autanic said:

 

The length of time you are married carries no weigh, in inheritance laws. I just checked a few things, any assets he has in Thailand will become hers. If he has children then they will be in all likelihood named in a will.

 

But in cases where no new will is drawn up, there are many cases that Marriage annuls any previous wills. This is why, most people make a new will to reaffirm what the children get after being married.

 

For instance in England, say you are unmarried and have a child and have a will stating all of your estate goes to the child.  Then you get married, the marriage is a contract that over rules a will. So you are in affect stating that all of your estate now belongs to you spouse. If you still want part of your estate to go to your child, then a new will has be lodged as the old was invalidated by the act of marriage.

 

Where a person's estate is held offshore or in other territories, then international convention states, "where the person is domicile", in this case he is domicile in Thailand, so all his assets would be dealt with by a Thai Court.  As stated earlier a Thai Court takes the sanctity of marriage very seriously as all Countries do and would award his Wife, the entire estate.  Collecting would be when lawyers were needed, but precedents have been set.

Not going to argue points of law with you, I'm not a lawyer and I doubt you are, but if he has named children, charities whatever as beneficiaries in his will, I can't see any court overuling that. Otherwise what's the point of a will?

[autanic]

1 minute ago, giddyup said:

Not going to argue points of law with you, I'm not a lawyer and I doubt you are, but if he has named children, charities whatever as beneficiaries in his will, I can't see any court overuling that. Otherwise what's the point of a will?

 

If he hasn't updated his will since getting married, the act of marriage has over ruled the will.

Edited September 7, 2016 by autanic

[soalbundy]

1 minute ago, autanic said:

 

If he hasn't updated his will since getting married, the act of marriage has over ruled the will.

If he has a son maybe he can take her over after papa dies,keep it all in the family.

[giddyup]

1 minute ago, autanic said:

 

If he hasn't updated his will since getting married, the act of marriage has over ruled the will.

If all his money is in Aussie banks and he has a pre-existing will that named his children as beneficiaries, that money could be tied up in the courts for decades if his current wife tried to fight it. Property or assets he has in Thailand would be a different matter.

[gdgbb]

8 hours ago, NickJ said:

Yeah, except that washed up ex hooker is still in demand with all the modeling and add agencies, being offered six figure contracts.

 

Hardly "washed up", then.

[LUSHGOAT]

Seems odd to me something smells perhaps fishy like a goodnight kiss and gets a cold that puts him icu and she is ok talking about the kiss of death.

[eddie61]

In actual fact, I think this subject is far to close to the bone for both people to be discussed on TV by pissheads, would be prime ministers and inventors of the next facebook (I include myself in all categories).

 

Which particular bone is really up to them alone: I suppose she took great care of his bone and she will take care of them in future.

 

I don't think he went into the deal without a good deal of thought.

 

[autanic]

23 minutes ago, giddyup said:

If all his money is in Aussie banks and he has a pre-existing will that named his children as beneficiaries, that money could be tied up in the courts for decades if his current wife tried to fight it. Property or assets he has in Thailand would be a different matter.

 

Pre-existing will is just that. The fact a bank is in Australia is irrelevant. The account would be closed upon his death and the money paid to beneficiaries lawyers. If asked are they married, then the money would become hers,  there is no case to answer in a court.

 

Were are actually both making assumptions about Harold's Children or otherwise, but lets put this to bed.

 

1. There married.

2. Anything in Thailand is her's. Unless he has named a new will after marriage.

3. No matter where assets are held, it is the legal title that matters.

4. Lets just hop Harold pulls through, he is not dead yet.

5. Maybe she might choose to give all of Harold's money away to the Working Transvestites Association of Happy A-GO-GO, Pattaya.  Who knows.

Edited September 7, 2016 by autanic

[giddyup]

3 minutes ago, autanic said:

 

Pre-existing will is just that. The fact a bank is in Australia is irrelevant. The account would be closed upon his death and the money paid to beneficiaries lawyers. If asked are they married, then the money would become hers,  there is no case to answer in a court.

You are guessing the outcome. Unless you have conclusive proof, it's only speculation.

[autanic]

The proof is they are married and domicile in Thailand. 

[giddyup]

2 minutes ago, autanic said:

The proof is they are married and domicile in Thailand. 

Been down this road before, just repeating yourself now. It's all conjecture, Harold might live for another 20 years.

Edited September 7, 2016 by giddyup

[autanic]

1 minute ago, giddyup said:

Been down this road before, just repeating yourself now. It's all conjecture, Harold might live for another 20 years.

 

Well lets hope so and lets hope he makes a new will in the meantime. 

[gdgbb]

9 minutes ago, autanic said:

 

Well lets hope so and lets hope he makes a new will in the meantime. 

 

Let's hope that you, obviously not being a lawyer, give it a rest also.

Edited September 7, 2016 by gdgbb

[autanic]

14 minutes ago, gdgbb said:

 

Let's hope that you, obviously not being a lawyer, give it a rest also.

I have not stated my Occupation. So have sex while travelling.

[Graemej100]

Don't worry Harold. I'll look after her. Promise.

[wow64]

Of course he is in ICU.. 

 

Retired moved to Thailand and married a young porn star. 

 

Its a wonder he lasted this long. 

[Seismic]

11 hours ago, colinneil said:

That photo is in a private room not ICU.

Is she trying to get more sympathy for Harold?
ICU rooms do not have tv remotes on a table,

Actually several hospitals have private ICU rooms which are serviced from a central area. Bumrungrad has these private single rooms in its ICU centre.