1 hour ago, onthesoi said:

 

Says the guy who was using a glass of water and some ice cubes to model the melting of the worlds ice.

 

 

It seems Nasa have also abandoned 'true science'.

Who to trust? An organisation who put a man on the moon and a robot on mars... Or some idiots on Thai visa who would fail an elementary, high school science class.

 

 

A leading NOD I see and one that has to resort to calling others with opposing views idiots.  A true gem of a person.  At least ice cubes in a glass of water is more realistic in regards to floating ice than the models and other aspects you so fervently deny.  We only deny he BS and scams, not many other matters that we realise are real and are capable of being rectified by man.  We do not resort to scaremongering, or calling others names, unlike yourself and some of you high priests.  

Edited November 26, 20169 yr by Si Thea01

While it may strictly true that at a given temperature the melting of sea ice won't contribute to rising seas, the thing is that the seas are growing warmer. As they grow warmer, the water expands in volume.  So that contributes to rising sea levels.

In addition, as Greenland and Antarctica lose glaciers, they lose mass.  Which decreases their gravitational pull on the water. So water that tends to congregate at or near the poles will flow back towards non polar regions where most humans are located.

 

 

 

On 11/25/2016 at 7:18 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

That's ice cap ( Antarctica ), singular. If the arctic melts no sea level rise happens. Yes, if the Greenland ice melts we are in trouble.

 

Pity they won't stop cutting down all the trees, isn't it?

Actually Exxon did lots of studies through 1988 showing that global warming was a fact.  They never published the results of their research.