3 minus 2 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 32 minutes ago, StevieH said: none of those world cups had 48 teams either. surprised at you wanting to deny the 'little man' a fair crack which undoubtblyt the current system does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bredbury Blue Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Why not do it like the Fa cup? Minnows play in groups and the top teams join in after the first week or so. The cup is bigger, more nationalities have a chance to be involved, top nations only join in when it gets serious in latter rounds (first round group, 2nd round group when top teams join winning minnows, group winners in knockout rounds). Have I got the job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jellydog Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Following the "logic" of many posters the World Cup ought to be open to every country on earth. Infantino and company are just following the tried and true MO of Blatter and his cronies. The more things change the more they remain the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LammyTS1 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Following the "logic" of many posters the World Cup ought to be open to every country on earth. Infantino and company are just following the tried and true MO of Blatter and his cronies. The more things change the more they remain the same.It is open to every country on earth, as long as they become a FIFA member. Around 30-40 countries are currently unable to compete. Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jellydog Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, LammyTS1 said: It is open to every country on earth, as long as they become a FIFA member. Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Indeed, poor wording on my part. My point being that Infantino is only repeating the Blatter scheme of throwing bones to as many as possible, so that their votes can be relied on down the line when necessary. Do you really think that Infantino gives a shit about the extra countries that would be included ? Ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LammyTS1 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Indeed, poor wording on my part. My point being that Infantino is only repeating the Blatter scheme of throwing bones to as many as possible, so that their votes can be relied on down the line when necessary. Do you really think that Infantino gives a shit about the extra countries that would be included ? Ridiculous.No problem. Personally I would like to see 48 teams in the finals and more Asian, Oceanic, Central American & African teams in the finals.Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bredbury Blue Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 http://www.fifa.com/fifa-world-ranking/ranking-table/men/index.html Some interesting nations at the bottom of the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LammyTS1 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Currently Oceanic gets no automatic place in the finals. Instead they must play off with S.America No5 although I think for Russia they will play off with the winners of the Asia 5/6th play off.Because of the difficulty of qualification, Australia moved from Oceanic to the Asian qualifiers. How they managed to do this I don't know. Hopefully they will now get 1 spot when it changes to 48. Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now