14 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

I don't believe that was proven.  Nor prosecuted.  Though some would have liked to see that done. 

 

 

You have a point. Reportedly, career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged. Comey should be investigated for ignoring them.

 

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/13/fbi-doj-roiled-by-comey-lynch-decision-to-let-clinton-slide-by-on-emails-says-insider.html

 

3 minutes ago, Ulysses G. said:

 

You have a point. Reportedly, career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged. Comey should be investigated for ignoring them.

 

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/13/fbi-doj-roiled-by-comey-lynch-decision-to-let-clinton-slide-by-on-emails-says-insider.html

 

But in the end, no charges.  Time to move on.

2 hours ago, Ulysses G. said:

 

You have a point. Reportedly, career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged. Comey should be investigated for ignoring them.

 

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/13/fbi-doj-roiled-by-comey-lynch-decision-to-let-clinton-slide-by-on-emails-says-insider.html

 

So here we go again on one of those big ol' off-topic deflections back onto Clinton.   But before this gets shut down, let's take a look at this from your source:

 

The source, who spoke to FoxNews.com on the condition of anonymity,

 

There goes the credibility on that report.   

On 1/13/2017 at 0:19 PM, Ulysses G. said:

 

Journalist Glenn Greenwald says the CIA wanted Hillary elected and strongly opposed Trump while aiding her campaign. Greenwald is not a Trump supporter, but his investigation of this issue is eye opening.

 

https://theintercept.com/2017/01/11/the-deep-state-goes-to-war-with-president-elect-using-unverified-claims-as-dems-cheer/

 

...

 

Considering Greenwald standing views on the CIA, it's hardly surprising he'll be supportive of any negative opinions.

 

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/963541-trump-blames-both-democrats-and-republicans-for-allegations/?page=3#comment-11520361

It's been oddly quiet from the Trump/Putin section. 

What's the next step? Threats of big war would be my personal guess. Let's see.

1 minute ago, oilinki said:

It's been oddly quiet from the Trump/Putin section. 

What's the next step? Threats of big war would be my personal guess. Let's see.

 

maybe.....  " Donald Trump suggests sanctions against Russia may be dropped if Moscow is 'helpful'

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-russia-sanctions-could-be-dropped-if-helpful-vladimir-putin-kremlin-us-a7527021.html

10 hours ago, Opl said:

 

maybe.....  " Donald Trump suggests sanctions against Russia may be dropped if Moscow is 'helpful'

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-russia-sanctions-could-be-dropped-if-helpful-vladimir-putin-kremlin-us-a7527021.html

From your link:
 

Quote

 

Sanctions placed on Russia by Barack Obama could be lifted if the country works with the US on battling terrorists and other goals, Donald Trump has suggested.

 

The President-elect told the Wall Street Journal he would keep sanctions against Russia intact “at least for a period of time”, as scrutiny over his relationship with the Kremlin intensifies.

 

 

So far, Russia has not worked with the US on battling terrorists, nor any other goals. LOL

29 minutes ago, craigt3365 said:

From your link:
 

 

So far, Russia has not worked with the US on battling terrorists, nor any other goals. LOL

They seem to be doing fine in Syria.

32 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

They seem to be doing fine in Syria.

You're kidding, right?  If Russia was working with the US, their soldiers would not have been bombed as the US would have known where they were.  Sadly, they didn't inform the US about this.

56 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

1 hour ago, craigt3365 said:

From your link:
 

 

So far, Russia has not worked with the US on battling terrorists, nor any other goals. LOL

They seem to be doing fine in Syria.

It's complicated.

 

Russia is fighting our terrorists.
Our terrorists are fighting Assad.
Assad is fighting his people.
ISIS is fighting everybody.
We are fighting ISIS so our terrorists can fight Assad.
The Kurds are fighting Assad and ISIS so they can have a homeland.
Turkey is fighting the Kurds so they can't.
Iran is helping Assad to use barrel bombs and gas.
Assad's gas is Saddam's old weapons of mass destruction.
Somewhere, there is a line in the sand.

 

But it does not matter so much.
ISIS went to Libya after our terrorists fought Gaddafi.
Libya is very complicated.

CIA Director Brennan: Trump should develop 'appreciation' for intel community

 

"Washington (CNN)CIA Director John Brennan implored President-elect Donald Trump to put his confidence in the intelligence community and develop an "appreciation" for the effect his words could have on national security."

 

"Brennan bristled at Trump's public displays of contempt for the intelligence community and said Trump needed to understand his words could undermine national security."

 

"If he doesn't have confidence in the intelligence community, what signal does that send to our partners and allies, as well as our adversaries?" Brennan said."

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/15/politics/john-brennan-cia-donald-trump/index.html

 

The clueless con-man continues to show his ignorance.

He has to be potty-trained by the professionals...

Edited January 16, 20179 yr by iReason