ExpatOilWorker

What has Elmo to do with tracking fires/billion miles? By the way, below it a quote from Tesla in the Guardian article YOU shared, so you quote Elmo, but you don't trust him or you don't know?

I would pick up a gun an go to Moscow!

Austria 🇦🇹 or Cyprus 🇨🇾 are cute 😍. Ireland 🇮🇪 is a freak show and UK 🇬🇧 is gay.

@Pib, @JBChiangRai, @KhunLA, please learn and live. The AutoinsuranceEZ numbers are total BS.

Are you guys really not capable of understanding that the fires per sales is misleading statistics?? Even after seeing the numbers?

You really don't understand it or are you blinded by EV propaganda? Anyway the FactCheck patrol 🚓 note you share fake information.

Actually, let me do the math for you. Hybrid sales = 16,052/3,474 x 100,000 = 462,061 ICE sales = 13,041,372 EV sales = 207,171 The math is simple, but totally ignores that there are few EV on the road and zero really old EVs.

Your link is (again) not working. Your chart have the numbers do the math and you will see I am right. They do TOTAL fires in the entire vehicle pool for each segment and then divide it by a single years sale. You must be able to understand that is massively false statistics in favor of EVs. Fires per billion miles is the only true number.

Seriously? You are spreading false EV propaganda and then you are not capable of understanding the facts even when the numbers are laid out in front of you?

I know you are struggling with math, but that is not how the numbers you are sharing was generated. What they did was simply total vehicle fires for a given year divided total sales. In 2021 there were 180,000 fires in the US and about 15 million sales. 180,000/15,000,000 × (100,000) = 1200 ICE fires/100,000 sales. Close enough to the 1530 number quote. When you do the same for EV the magic 🎩 starts. Most EVs are new, and few were sold more than 3 years ago so total numbers of fires is of course low, but current sales numbers are high and you get the wonderful, but fake number of 25 EV fires/100,000 sales. Spreading bias and false EV info only harms the industry and ur own credibility.

Nope, they take fires 🔥 from those 2,000,000 ICEV and divide it with the 100,000 sales. Then do the same for EV and get fake statistics that are a factor 20 off.

Seriously? Sell 100,000 ICE for 20 years and you got 2,000,000 cars on the road. Sell 100,000 EV this years and none the past 19 year and you got 100,000 cars on the road. Now let's do some fake 🔥 statistics. We need that guy with the kindergarten master degree to start the math class urgently.

So open this link for me....

I agree 👍.

This report?

You need to open the link, then look for the Swedish report. That link is not working.

Seriously? Per vehicle sold is falsifying statistics, since EV are just entering the market. Try per billion miles.

Did the electromagnetic fields totally fry your brain 🧠 this morning? Your are quoting some Swedish statistics, where the link to the report doesn't exist and in the post below you jump on the high horse that this is only and exclusively about Thai EVs. The cherry 🍒 picker patrol and team FactChecker simply can't keep up at this speed.

EVs does depreciate faster than ICEVs, but that is just half the story. EVs typical drive 60-70% the annual miles an ICEV does, so on average ICEV retain their value way better than EVs.

It is apple chutney, slightly sweetened with caramelized brown sugar.

The Thais are great at testing the limits of these new EVs, but the good new is that they don't seem to burst into a fireball.

"Only" 6 of the 31 Abrams have been destroyed or damaged. Ukraine 🇺🇦 is taking good care of it's new toys.

Thanks God we are all allowed to call BS. The FactCheck patrol 🚓 was alerted 📢. The correct number is 11 times, for Tesla vs. all ICE fires 🔥.

Here is a training video for next time you charge your bike at home. F1XyobOoZhzuDay1.mp4