bradiston

18 minutes ago, Airalee said:

Oh whatever.

 

I’ll bet I can find quite a few posts that you either made or “liked” that tried to shame us.

 

But I don’t want to trawl through your 92,000+ posts on the forum.

 

Get a life.

 

 

Get a jab!

31 minutes ago, Airalee said:

Why are there so many fat kids today compared to when we were kids?

 

Nobody seems to want to change their diet and dog forbid they get up off their fat a$$es and go for a walk.

 

But of course, doing it for the chillllllldren is the best way to try to shame us….so fat slobs here on the forum can continue on with their gluttonous lifestyles.  
 

I see them on the “where’s the best pizza” threads…or writing restaurant reviews on google…even during the pandemic.  

 

Or they’re on the health forum looking for that next pill/injection they can take in order to party on.  
 

Ozempic anybody?

 

The people howling the loudest for us to get vaccinated for their protection were the people who didn’t take responsibility for their health in the past.

 

This is the blowback for all the people who tried to force, shame and belittle us into taking a jab on their behalf.

 

Own it.

 

 

 

 

I've no idea what you're on about. You seem to have been terribly hurt, nay, damaged even, by the vaxers. Is this revenge? What did they do to you? Tie you up and wave a syringe around? Poor bunny. Now it's your turn to sob.

6 hours ago, bradiston said:

Held for over 20 years without charge? Where else in the world could that happen?

Why the confused emojis? You don't believe me?

1 hour ago, Airalee said:

They keep popping up on this thread to tell us about them.  All their fat friends and family.

 

It’s like a round people convention on here.

You've made a number of comments that reference "fat" people, and kids in particular, @Airalee. It wasn't only overweight people for whom COVID was a death knell. Many other comorbidities besides obesity. Heart, circulation, diabetes, respiratory. Just an easy group for you to target I guess. You know how crushing it is for a teenager to be called "fat"? Bullied, body shamed, humiliated. You're an adult now. Time to grow up. Cue silly sob graphic.

1 hour ago, alanrchase said:

Did you really? Compulsory insurance is 645 baht. Second class insurance on my bike cost 2,400 baht. 500,000 baht for each injured person, 10,000,000 baht maximum for each accident and 600,000 baht for property damage. You need to change insurance companies.

I paid 550 THB for 1 year tax and one year compulsory insurance. Maybe I'm wrong about the 1st class payout. I haven't received the cover note or policy docs yet. Just a quick scan of the Thai version. I went to Macallan on Tai. Somebody else recommended it on the forum. A big office, 6 or 7 people working at desks. Good English spoken. I'll recheck when I get the docs.

12 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Indeed. The Islamophobic Brits I know are usually the type that are miffed as their jellied eel shops have been replaced by kebab shops and they go on about how if Reggie and Ronnie Kray were still around, there would be no crime. It's getting old and resistance to change. Rather ironic as they are all immigrants in Thailand, where they are generally peacefully accepted. 

Yes, and what gets my goat about foreign criticism and ladyboy bashing, is, Thailand is, as you say, a generally peaceloving and extremely tolerant country. They don't bash ladyboys as most grew up with at least one in their village. Thai women seem to really value their company as they are an extremely good laugh generally, expert at make up, beauty products, and all things "feminine", as that's how they see themselves, and intelligent, in my experience. Why bash them? They see themselves as women, so who are you or I to argue? If you take the time to get to know one or two, they usually have extraordinary stories about their lives. Growing up as a lady boy in rural Thailand, some married to foreigners, property owning, smart entrepreneurs etc etc. There are many in the Thai civil service. In Thailand, it's just not a big deal.

I went to renew my bike insurance yesterday here in Pattaya. The most I could insure myself for, for accidental personal damage was 20k THB. That's what they call first class insurance. The other party was covered for 50k. Without my medical insurance, in patient only, might as well stick with the compulsory 300 THB government cover. This policy cost me 4,230 THB. I guess it's a snip. So I don't know what kind of insurance foreigners can get to cover these monster bills we read about. Surely the premium would be more than the cost of the holiday?

9 minutes ago, Dart12 said:

I agree with you,. I approve of the word, transgender woman or lady boy because that is a classification itself that is explanatory.

 

do not agree with the west attempting to state that a transgender woman is an actual woman and that it’s inappropriate to use the correct adjectives in front of the word woman when you speak about them.

 

There’s nothing wrong with people being people, but it gets ridiculous when they’re trying to remove labels and state that they are one in the same.

Any mention of gender, and it's worth recalling that everything, animate and inanimate, in all European languages, English being the exception, has a gender. And they by no means agree about the sex of a stone, for instance. Masculine in German, feminine in French. Except some additional words for stone are the opposite. So, what's it all about, Alfie? Take a walk on the wild side! Girls or boys? Oh yes.

7 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

Living in Thailand, for over 26 years. No plans to go home. Run businesses, married, two children, 3 cats and 2 dogs as well as an aquarium. Built houses for us, family  and so on. All is so much better here, and will probably just stay that way.

Nice one Gotters!

37 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You are lumping all Muslims into a stereotype by implying that Muslim immigrants are inherently radical or dangerous, which is simply untrue. Nearly all Muslims, whether immigrants or residents of their home countries, are peaceful, law-abiding individuals.

Labelling entire communities based on the actions of a small extremist minority is discriminatory and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. You probably think 9/11 happened in a vacuum and the US don't commit horrors in Muslim countries.  

Sure. There are 1.9 billion Muslims globally. The largest number are in the Asia-Pacific region. Are they causing you any grief? How many have you met out here? I used to live in Trad province. Many Muslims there. You'd be surprised how many well educated highly skilled architects, engineers are Muslim. They don't brandish it around though. It's not like they're in your face, is it? Not like some! Same down south, though I've not lived there. Take as you find. If you travel with a head full of preconceived ideas, what's the point of travelling at all?

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

And now Biden continues to wreak havoc in his final days by releasing 11 Gitmo terrorist detainees.

 

If they hurry, Biden will allow them to sneak into the USA at the Southern Border before he leaves office.

 

 

Held for over 20 years without charge? Where else in the world could that happen?

2 minutes ago, georgegeorgia said:

You should leave earlier especially if it's given you anxiety ,your not young anymore and your mental health is suffering.

Yes low season is much better 

Quite, low season, if there still is such a thing, is heavenly compared to this. But I'm thinking maybe they're here to stay, and low season is a thing of the past, at least in Pattaya. But I can hardly complain as I'm here for similar reasons, for sure.

6 hours ago, balo said:

I think most members visit Thailand every year but they do not live here year round.  Most of my Norwegian friends who can afford it or already retired stay here during the winter months. 

 

I have 2 Norwegian friends. They both live here year round. 2 of the nicest ex pats I know. I divide my time between here and Philippines. I'm finding high season hard going. I live in Pratamnak which has gone from being an extremely quiet backwater to hard core crowded, traffic laden horror. I'm hoping they'll all fo by mid January! If not, well ... Maybe time to upsticks.

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Not just #1 in the whinging department:

 

 

 

Good old UK. 1 silver and 2 4ths. Proud.

6 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Yes, I mean science and I fully appreciate that I am a blasphemer.

What's your religion? Could be serious.

5 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

It's BS jargon.

Oh, you mean science? Yes, the world was created 6,000 years ago and it's flat. Is that it? Nice and simple? All this technical talk makes your brain hurt? Much easier to just believe the BS - cull, poison, plot. Language you understand, right? So tedious.

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

That's most probably because it was the very first post on this Off-the-Beaten-Track censorship-free sub-forum. 

Note that I posted that particular item originally on the Covid-19 sub-forum, and instead of deleting it there (as it did not come from an AN-accepted 'credible' source) it was moved by the Mods to the current sub-forum.  Hence the date of 24 Nov of that post, while this sub-forum was launched on 16 Dec, and has been an overnight success as it allows Free Speech and real discussion.

 

Yes, I'm impressed! But even now it seems to have garnered little attention. You know, with all the fuss and outrage engendered by the supposed withholding of the documents. With their release, it's odd we're not getting a lot of "See? I told you so!" type responses. Can anyone really be bothered to comb through 300,000 (to date) pages of scientific research trying to find where Pfizer supposedly cooked the books? Much easier to just invent a theory based on their original refusal to release them, engendering imaginings of "They must have something to hide", and countless YouTubers calling themselves doctors decrying the cover up. So, where's the beef? 13.64 billion doses administered worldwide. All other numbers somehow pale into insignificance in comparison. No mass extinction. The world carries on. Even found time to launch 2 murderous wars since COVID.

For numbers if vaccines I went here:

https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/vaccines?n=c

On 1/4/2025 at 9:23 AM, Red Phoenix said:

 

@bradiston > You wrote "But I can't find any reference to any reaction to the ongoing release anywhere. The plaintiffs seems to have gone quiet. Who knows?"

 

The 300.000 Pfizer documents that were released over a 1.5 year period (instead of keeping them buried for 75 years as the FDA wanted) are being investigated by a crowdsourced investigation team led by dr Naomi Wolf.  Obviously you won't find anything about it on the complicit mainstream-media.

But dr Wolf has been continually posting on alternative media about the crimes that are evidenced from Pfizers own documents. 

Actually the very first post on this new sub-forum was about that specific issue. 

See link to post below >

 

I found your linked post dated November 24th 2024. Not a single reply. Odd, considering what is being claimed now by Ms Wolf. Yes, she posts on X, Musk's madhouse. The link concerns the effects of COVID jabs on female reproductive systems, referencing, but not showing, charts indicating disastrous consequences for 1000s of women and girls. But nobody seems to have followed up on this. Why? There are a million and one anti vax commentators, "scientists", experts, but they all seem to be shy of being seen in public with "la Wolf".

But there are links to a Japanese cancer specialist describing "turbo cancer", based on a report of a woman finding her husband dead 5 days after a jab.

The war of words, "facts" and "figures" between pro and anti Vax campaigners continues. Its an industry in itself.

On 12/31/2024 at 3:43 PM, Airalee said:

Yes.  It is gaslighting.  Stating “maybe you didn’t trust it” is a perfect example.

 

Gaslighting is a colloquialism, defined as manipulating someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

Easy for him to reply, which he did.

3 hours ago, Dan O said:

who's deflecting now? I have raised the same issue, you only refer to your comment when you jumped into the conversation but not the original people in the discussion, like I stated multiple times.

 

You tried to claim in a backhanded way the phrase thick is somehow super derogatory, like calling someone a retard. Facts are facts some people are thick headed and refuse to admit when they are wrong they just argue in circles, just like you are doing. I havent misrepresented anything.  Go have some dinner and a nap and youll feel better. Im done discussing your non issue on this conversation. have a good day

You see, "Go have some dinner and a nap and you'll feel better". What do you call that? It's presumptuous, patronising, and offensive. You keep signing off then coming back with the same arguments.

4 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

What a fool you are, really.

One quick example at random - https://www.malaysiaairlines.com/mhapp/hq/en/important-notice/india.html

 

Maybe you need something explained to you about air travel and airlines. When an airline accepts you for transportation they accept responsibility(!) that YOU are LEGAL to be transported.

Therefore, if the destinatioin of your trip refuses you legal entry - for ANY reason - you are required to be transported back where you came from, by the airline that brought you in.

Airlines don't like carrying passengers free of charge. And on a fully booked flight a fare paying passenger will be off-loaded to carry back the deportee. This is why airlines demand things like vaccination proofs, visas and valid passports you idiot.

 

Now - your turn - tell us about the 'hundreds of thousands' of unvaccinated individuals you 'met' during global lockdowns.

We're waiting with baited breath.

 

Wait ----are you in Africa??

I can add Philippines Airlines and Cebu Pacific.

4 hours ago, Dan O said:

You refer to your own comments repeatly but not the original comments made by others making false claims in similar circular posts.  

 

 You have a great day now

Yes,  I refer to my comments as you insist on misrepresenting them. As usual, you deflect and deny. You're definitely going round in circles.

15 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

@bradiston > You wrote "But I can't find any reference to any reaction to the ongoing release anywhere. The plaintiffs seems to have gone quiet. Who knows?"

 

The 300.000 Pfizer documents that were released over a 1.5 year period (instead of keeping them buried for 75 years as the FDA wanted) are being investigated by a crowdsourced investigation team led by dr Naomi Wolf.  Obviously you won't find anything about it on the complicit mainstream-media.

But dr Wolf has been continually posting on alternative media about the crimes that are evidenced from Pfizers own documents. 

Actually the very first post on this new sub-forum was about that specific issue. 

See link to post below >

 

Another discredited conspiracy theorist. Why are you guys endlessly citing these old hags as reliable sources of information? No, they're not found on MSM, including Reuters, Bloomberg, The FT, the NYT, the Washington Post etc etc, for good reason. They're rubbish, that's why! You have to look in the sewers and trash cans of discarded has beens to find anything to nibble on. Hope you don't catch any nasty diseases there.

And what of the original plaintiffs, the PHMPT?

19 minutes ago, Airalee said:

It’s too bad for the boomer vax fanatics that a judge ordered the FDA to speed up the release of the Pfizer vaccine trial data which is giving us a lot of this juicy data to work with.

 

I’m surprised that the pro-vax people didn’t even know about this wonderful news as it’s almost 3 years old now.   I guess they didn’t see it on the boob tube.  That’s what you get for relying on CNN and MSNBC

 

I guess one needs to be a “poorly educated fool” to dig this stuff up.

 

Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto

 

“In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine. 

That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information.”

 

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

 

 

Here's the judge, Mark T. Pittman, at the initial hearing, to agree a realistic release schedule, speaking to the plaintiff's lawyer, Aaron Siri, concerning the nature of the hearing:

"But the real thing I want to consider, let's figure out the best, quickest way to get these documents. And rather than arguing that the Government is trying to hide something or there's some big conspiracy here, that the green alien people want to inject us with something, is not going to be helpful, okay? Let's figure out how do we resolve this, and save the other argument for outside of the courtroom."

There's 56 pages of this, so cut to the chase... They did agree, Pfizer, the plaintiffs and the court, on an updated schedule. But I can't find any reference to any reaction to the ongoing release anywhere. The plaintiffs seems to have gone quiet. Who knows?