Jump to content

Gweiloman

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,433
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gweiloman

  1. I’m sure there are Russians who would love to see him gone. Similarly, I’m sure there are Americans who would love to see Biden gone, Brits who would love to see Sunak gone, Germans who would love to see Olaf gone, French who would love to see Macron gone, Indians who would love to see Modi gone etc etc etc. What’s your point?
  2. Tell me, why would Putin want to attack Europe? Even a fool (and Putin is no fool, else he wouldn’t be the leader of one of three superpowers in the world) would know that trying to govern another country that is opposed to you would be an impossible task. Does he want to exploit the much valued resources that Europe has, such as gold, lithium, rare earth minerals, oil and gas reserves? Or that he craves the Bohemian ducks of CZ, the sauerkraut and pork knuckle of DE so much that he wants to make them a national dish of Russia? And if he can’t even occupy Ukraine after 2 years, is he going to keep this up for the next 30 years, to wear Europe down? You are probably so blinded in your opinion that you won’t even realise how ridiculous your statement that Putin wants to attack Europe sounds.
  3. I wonder if any of the jurors have been threatened with sanctions…
  4. My sentiments exactly. The obvious question most westerners fail to acknowledge is what’s the motive behind such attacks? Something as senseless as Brenda Spencer’s dislike of Mondays? Or something more fundamental like wanting revenge on a society that has killed off your family and loved ones? Why don’t we see attacks like this in countries like Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, China, Malaysia, Indonesia? The Bali bombing and the attack on Jkt Marriott were very specific and targeted attacks on mostly whites. You can bet that if a country (mostly they are western ones sadly) dropped a bomb on my homeland and killed my loved ones, I will be plotting revenge day in and day out. In any case, these instances are few and far in between. In 2023, there was something like 643 mass shootings in that peace loving country across the pond. People there are more likely to be killed by cops (3 a day on average) than by an Islamic extremist.
  5. There’s only one child posting on here. Wait a bit. He’ll be responding to this post soon.
  6. Those reds under the bed keeps him awake as he races towards 100k cfmps.
  7. Even though it’s called a Seal, I believe it’s sold as a car and not a submarine, thus not meant to be submerged in water. Does anyone know if the battery casing is advertised as fully waterproof or just water resistant?
  8. What a load of rubbish. This woman has zero credibility. Some examples: The tweet had included a link to a CNN news article claiming the president elect was planning to assign the East Wing of the White House, traditionally the First Lady's domain, to his eldest daughter Ivanka. The news article was later determined to be false, with CNN publishing a retraction. After deleting the tweet from her page, Ioffe tweeted several apologies.[56] On October 29, 2018, Ioffe appeared on CNN's The Lead with Jake Tapper, where she took part in a discussion about President Trump's rhetoric in the wake of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting. She opined that, "this president has radicalized so many more people than ISIS ever did", pointing to a 60% rise in antisemitic attacks during 2017. The comment received pushback from fellow panelists David Urban and Mona Charen. Ioffe later apologized for the comment during the broadcast and on Twitter calling her comments "hyperbole" In November 2019, Ioffe accused a writer on the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on Twitter of being a Russian troll after noticing one of its stories about Hunter Biden used a symbol that she mistakenly identified as a Russian-style quotation mark. After her mistake was pointed out to her, Ioffe deleted her tweets and tweeted an apology. Just another example of a low level headline grabbing journalist who doesn’t bother much with the truth. Amazing that some people believes such nonsense.
  9. That’s why we should analyse what’s being said and think for ourselves as to what could be the possible truth and not blindly follow the crowd, especially western msm which, in my view, is no longer independent, impartial or objective. This professor of economics for example, makes a great case of one of the weaknesses of capitalism vs a more centralised government, using empirical data and his conclusions are what we actually see today. I love how some posters will just brand every word that for example, Putin says as falsehood or lies. These posters are so consumed by their own biases and prejudice that they have lost the ability of intelligent thought and blindly eats up whatever sources they choose to follow tells them to.
  10. In case you haven’t seen this, I found it quite enlightening.
  11. I agree. Tell me again, how many countries have America invaded in the last few decades? Hmmm… I smell hypocrisy rising to the surface.
  12. Sigh… What I would give for some originality, some content, no matter how farcical… I guess I better not hold my breath…
  13. A top gun pilot who can’t tell the difference between a Chinese, Malay or Indian must be rare indeed. I can understand if he can’t tell the difference between a mainland Chinese or a Singapore Chinese (Tom Cotton couldn’t) but I don’t think that Singapore has any aircraft carriers, do they?
  14. There is one thing I’m rather curious about. Say you own an electrical appliance. Could be a fan, a microwave, a mobile phone or a golf buggy. Would you leave it in water at a depth that might cover the electronic components in said appliance? And if you do, would you be surprised if said appliance stops working? Even if it wasn’t an electrical appliance, like say, a book. Would you leave your book in a pool of water and then be surprised that the pages might fall out?
  15. Ukraine is losing fast Oh no, don’t say that. He’s gonna ask you for a link to support your claim and he will expend huge amount of effort to shoot down any links you post (it might even get reported…) and then there will be 2 pages of back and fro, undoubtedly with content free micro posts from the Red hater.
  16. You’re getting quite good at emulating your buddy’s content free micro posts. Keep up the good work!
  17. You mean to say that Chinese students enroll in US universities (paying a lot of money to the universities, I should add), study hard, learn what they paid to learn, then return back to China where they put to good use, what they paid a lot of money to learn. Sounds about right. Isn’t that what an education is all about? I hope at the very least that they learned how to punctuate their sentences. Otherwise, that would be a waste of their parents’ hard earned money.
  18. Wait. You mean these retired top guns are teaching the PLA’s navy pilots who are in the US Air Force?
  19. Shhh… not so loud. The other side still thinks Ukraine is going to win. You don’t want to hurt their feelings now, do you?
  20. Yes he could. However he estimates that Ukraine’s casualties are 5 times higher so it’s really more in Ukraine’s interest to capitulate. But that’s unlikely to happen as some lawmakers in America has declared to fight to the last Ukrainian. Poor Ukraine.
  21. However, he emphasized that these weapons would not be used to target Russia's capital or its government. "They're authorized to be used in proximity to the border when they're being used on the other side of the border to attack specific targets in Ukraine," Biden explained. "We're not authorizing strikes 200 miles into Russia and we're not authorizing strikes on Moscow, on the Kremlin." What fools like him don’t realise is that what he thinks is acceptable does not matter. It’s what Russia thinks that matters. Just goes to show how incompetent these top western leaders are in world diplomacy.
  22. Wait. You mean these so called top guns don’t realise that their students are of a different race? Are they disguised as Winnie the Pooh or something?
  23. Oh no. At least his (EOW’s) posts have some content, erroneous or not.
  24. That’s usually all some posters can come up with when they can’t counter facts. A lot of well respected scholars, academics, military experts have given their reasons and analysis of the events but most are just labelled as Kremlin apologists and propagandists and even God forbid, Reds… lol. On the other side, you have CNN, MSNBC, BBC, the State Department, Baerbock, Kallas… lol. Here is one of the best takes on the conflict I have come across. I have not heard of this person before but he is one hell of a smart cookie. Might be too long and too honest for some though

×
×
  • Create New...