- Popular Post
Baerboxer
-
Posts
24,477 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Baerboxer
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:Comparing Biden and Harris, with Trump and Pence, is a bit like comparing George Carlin and Richard Pryor, with Pauly Shore and Carrot top, to use comics as a measurement of caliber.
They are smart, capable, decent, and competent. A far cry from the latter pair.
Trump is cascading toward the biggest humiliation of his lifetime. He is destined for a lifetime of the thing that will hurt him most. Obscurity and irrelevance.
Biden - decent - 55555555555555555555555!
Oh, sorry I forgot. It's ok for left politicians to be totally corrupt, line their pockets and those of family and friends. Do as we say not as we do and all that.
- 2
- 3
- 3
-
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, ShindenGo said:What an absolute Joke of a President! He’s inside a walled building, a building with walls and bulletproof windows, with a small army of armed soldiers and surrounded by a team of people with guns...and he’s still afraid that the has to hide in his little bunker!?! If Joe Biden we’re president, he wouldn’t runaway, he wouldn’t hide in his bunker, he would face it head on! He would save America, he would end systemic white supremacy infecting the US and put a stop to racism. Joe wouldn’t hide but now we see Trump would
Biden the Brave 55555555555!
So brave he's been a virtual recluse. Was that to avoid debates, looking stupid making nonsensical comments in TV interviews? Or perhaps he was being difficult and not learning the scripts well? Or was it because at his very old age he might be susceptible to Covid 19?
All his decades in politics, as an elected representative, what exactly has he achieved? What outstanding things will he be remembered for? Huntergate? Sniffing ladies and girls?
- 3
- 1
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Sujo said:
He didnt need to be escorted, he knows the way to the bunker and could do it blindfolded.
That's not the point. The decision is the Secret Service's.
Or are you trust being obtuse?
- 1
-
5 hours ago, edwinchester said:
Why do they keep resorting to violence? Because the Republicans make it so easy for any nutjob to own a gun.
Including all those radical far left supporting nut jobs, Marxists, looters and fanatics.
- 1
- 1
-
31 minutes ago, Sujo said:
Before or after he said the 1917 pandemic, which was in 1918, caused the end of WW2, which for trump supporters i have to say was 1945.
He really will have problems saying things about Bidens mental health when he himself has issues.
No there is a difference. Trump is ignorant and can't be bothered learning things he considers irrelevant or not important. And he don't give a sh$$t what anyone things about that.
Biden shows strong signs of mental capacity deterioration. Could be due to many different things. But at his age, not surprising.
- 1
- 1
-
8 hours ago, Thailand said:
Pelosi never was a good shot.
Probably got the shakes from all that booze!
-
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Logosone said:And she plays the woman-card as well to mask her incompetence. Shameless.
"The mayors are getting it done", yes we can see that, this has to be the worst state Chicago is in since the 1930s in terms of crime.
She's got herself nicely caught between two rocks. She's incompetent - nothing unusual for a Democrat mayor; so she plays the race and feminine cards against fair criticism.
She now, in the face of escalating black on black shootings, escalating looting and thieving, escalating vandalism and lawlessness can't support defunding the police.
BLM are showing they aren't a group solely protesting police brutality against blacks. They twist and lie to suit their agenda, encouraging violently resisting arrest whilst thieving and looting and demanding the police by abolished. They want to create as much mayhem and disorder in society, as much divide as possible, chaos and lawlessness. And the the Marxist/Socialist/Radical left can fill the power void. Should that ever happen, watch them enforce control. They'll make the police look like social workers!
She's now fallen foul of BLM by daring to criticize armed looters for shooting at police and criticizing looters for thieving luxury goods.
And creepy old corrupt pervy Joe wants to praise BLM!
Wakey wakey US - before it's too late! Joe will even take your guns and rights of self defense away in his eagerness to pander to the far left.
- 6
- 1
- 1
-
7 hours ago, Matzzon said:
Yep, as I´ve always said. They have too much to deal with in their own country, instead of putting their noses where it doesn´t belong.
Which applies to virtually all those so called "first world" countries.
See Macron couldn't miss the photo op and gatecrashed Beirut!
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
I take it you are enjoying some benefits.
There your assumptions would be wrong, again, as it seems they most often are.
- 1
- 1
-
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:
Well yes, but the British Government we’re keen toddle on behind and play their part.
While insignificant other EU nations wring their hands whilst holding on to the shirt tales to collect any benefits that might come their way!
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
10 minutes ago, simple1 said:Asylum seekers have to be assessed as to their status; making claims without credible source link/s is not helpful. An example link to contribute to your journey of discovery, rather than uninformed opinion...
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/
As members have been repeatedly advised which some ignore and repeat your comments ad nauseum it is not 'illegal' for asylum seekers to enter the UK from Europe or elsewhere. Should HMG enact legislation, contrary to the Convention/s they have signed, to declare them as 'illegals' it would be a different matter. In the meantime, how about educating yourself on the current law as applied in the UK, rather than persistently posting misinformation. To assist your comprehension...
in 1999 a UK judge ruled that “some element of choice is indeed open to refugees as to where they may properly claim asylum”. The judge specified that “any merely short-term stopover en route” to another country should not forfeit the individual’s right to claim refugee status elsewhere. The ruling in effect meant people could legitimately make a claim for asylum in the UK after passing through other “safe” countries.
international law also does not require asylum seekers to claim asylum in the first safe country they enter. This principle has been recognised in UK case law, and section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 also provides a defence against prosecuting refugees for entering the UK.
Which is why Boris, quite correctly says, the laws need urgently revising.
No illegal economic migrant should be able to enter the UK illegally and be well looked after and allowed to stay. Period.
- 4
- 1
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, CorpusChristie said:Dont suppose you took a Thai Wife along with you, did you ?
Foreigners living in Thailand complaining about all the foreigners living in their own country ????
I don't know whether he did or not. But that's immaterial.
Have you seen foreigners swamping Bangkok, changing its character completely; stamping their own culture, beliefs and religions over the host countries? Can foreigners come here illegally and be gifted property, accommodation, clothes, food, health services, education and even spending money? Can illegal economic migrants enter Thailand, take advantage of all these freebies and get citizenship?
Some what different I think.
- 9
- 1
- 3
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:All part of the UK getting its borders back and withdrawing the UK’s half hearted ‘cooperation’ with its neighbors.
Well that and the outcome of wars and ‘regime’ changes the UK played a part in.
France, as usual shifty, hypercritical and pretending to try and get their way.
Time the UK and some others maned up. People don't want a world socialist totalitarian federation in which their historical cultures are rubbished and destroyed.
Time borders were policed and laws enforced.
- 4
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Somtamnication said:
Didn't recognize London or Cambridge when I was there last year. Not English, anymore. Labour let them in a decades ago (thanks Blair) and it never stopped.
Started late 60's early 70's - before Blair. Subsequent governments, Labour and Conservative, made it worse by pandering to immigrants and passing laws which encouraged more to come.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
32 minutes ago, robblok said:People are now talking about the democracy protests ( a good thing). But this shows how rotten Thai politics are. There is absolutely no chance of getting honest people in power until some real punishment is given in crimes like this.
However those that have to make these laws and hand out punishment are also those who benefit the most. So i am not sure if things will ever change. Also getting a Thaksin party in power won't change as they are just as bad. The only good ones were the future forward party (and still they could have bad apples too).
Protests are nice.. but what do they solve if they just change one group of bad people with an other group of bad people.
Nothing will change until a robust independent justice system is in place. One that enforces and applies all laws fairly, evenly, and to all without favor or prejudice.
- 3
-
3 hours ago, bristolgeoff said:
How many years did it happen, now they are going down this route.Why not at the start.like closing the gate after the horses have gone
They never expected to be challenged so much on all the fairy stories and made up excuses. They thought they'd simply let him lie low (well lying low as billionaires do) and then quietly drop the charges without telling anyone. Bare in mind it was CNN who reported the charges had been dropped, not any domestic media.
All the various ruses put forward have been significantly challenged by angry citizens. So it's back to the drawing board to thrash out a new "solution that suits all" set of stories. And avoids any accountability for all those involved.
-
1 hour ago, paul1804 said:
Was the officer on the motorbike stationary when the Ferrari ran into it? If they were both travelling in the same direction at the time of impact and the officer was doing 60kph, the Ferrari 170 the difference being only 110kph.
I think all those giving evidence in favor of the Boss should be made to reveal all their bank account details around that time, including all officials and officers of the law! That would really open up a can of worms and anyone guilty of receiving money for knowingly providing false evidence be convicted and the money confiscated and donated to Covid victims.Bank accounts - shoe boxes under the bed mate!
- 1
-
2 hours ago, welovesundaysatspace said:
Like I said, you would have to build a wall in the channel then in order to not let anyone in in the first place. Once their boats are in UK waters, what the UK gonna do?
So you don't see the irony in countries trying to shift these illegals onto others?
France suffers because other EU countries won't process them and allow them to travel into France. Now you want France to do the same?
As to what the UK should do? Intern all illegal immigrants in detention camps, very basic camps. Not 4 star hotels, with wifi, clothes, food and pocket money provided. No welfare benefits, zilch. They stay there till they're sorted out. Genuine asylum this way and welcome. Illegal economic chancers - work camps until deportation.
Whilst there's plenty of freebies, including houses, health care, education, spending money etc they'll keep coming; and when there's enough demand more and more.
- 2
-
3 hours ago, welovesundaysatspace said:
Boarding a boat is probably not illegal, so there’s nothing much the French police can do about it. They could patrol the border in the channel, but that would cost a bit for nothing in return (quite the opposite, they’re probably happy to get rid of people who want to leave anyway; wow, that sounds like Brexit). So the UK would have to pay if it wanted to outsource their border control to the French, but that would upset Brexiteers who wanted to “take back control” of their borders. So in the end, the UK will have to deal with them, unless it wants to build a wall in the channel. Sending them back will hardly work as many don’t have paperwork. It’s not like you can put them in the mail and write “E. Macron, Paris” on it.
I believe the UK and France will agree on a deal similar to the one between the EU and Turkey.
If you can't see the difference between Brexit and mass illegal economic immigration then you really are beyond any form of intelligent reasoning.
Are you seriously suggesting France will use the threat of aiding and abetting illegal immigration into the UK as levers to get money (or fishing rights) out of the UK?
Wow, just how low has shifty France sunk in your opinion?
-
18 minutes ago, sungod said:
Thanks Gilly, whats your view on the Indian Ocean?
He'll have interesting views on the South China see then!
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, 7by7 said:
We have no right to stop them in French waters, no right to stop them in international waters. (Rescue is not the same as stop.)
Once they are in UK territorial waters, international law and UNHCR conventions to which the UK is a signatory all say that they are the UK's responsibility.
Maybe the UK should take a leaf out of Australia's book? They dealt with too many illegals coming by boat.
Isle of Wight could house some nice detention centers.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, kingdong said:
perhaps take a leaf out of the land of smiles book and put illegal immigrants in prison.
Or turn the boats around, and give them a good hard push back out into international waters!
But, seriously, I agree. Any illegal immigrants should be placed in a not too comfortable detention center whilst their fate is decided: genuine asylum or deportation for illegal economic migrants. No four star accommodation with free wifi, clothes, food etc etc etc.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
10 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Not subtle at all, your xenophobia and racism is crystal clear.
Yes anyone who won't ignore laws the left wing don't consider politically correct must be denounced.
Xenophobic, racist, oh and you forgot fascist too!
- 1
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, crazykopite said:Very sad yet the Boss case for killing a policeman is closed after 8 years even though they know he was under the influence of cocaine I ask myself did they really put in the effort to find this poor girls killers or were they clearing out files and came across the case and decided that’s it , thankfully in the U.K. no murder case is ever closed until they find out who committed the murder and that’s how it should be ????RIP????
From reading about this case over several years, it seems an open secret in Chiang Mai who the murderer is and why he is untouchable.
If, and that's a big if, those various stories are true, then it seems obvious more effort was put into hiding rather than finding the perp!
- 5
- 1
Harris makes campaign-trail debut with Democrat Biden, criticizes Trump on coronavirus
in World News
Posted
Are your assertions based on their manifesto, recent comments they made from reputable media or television debates/interviews.
Or just an opinion of what you think their policies might be?