Bluespunk

<deleted> him. Let him rot in a cell or die in misery and absolute poverty.

Should have left him to rot. He is unrepentant scum. looking to secure a book deal to cash in on his crimes. Pure filth.

Just keeps on getting worse. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/23/elon-musk-orders-twitter-to-remove-suicide-prevention-feature?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Now that would make for a happy new year.

Yeah, funny that. Two unfounded incorrect claims on my posts. Good job I’m not paranoid eh…besides only one was doing so to wriggle out of being proved wrong…

You claimed that I said the U.K. is better off than other countries in the post you quoted. You wrote ”Surprised you said that the UK is much better off than many countries.” I didn’t say this.

My post was simply pointing out that brexiteers shouldn’t complain about posters referring to the negative economic impact of brexit.

I didn’t say that. What gave you that impression? I don’t really see why what think about remainers or brexiteers is relevant to this thread to be honest.

People are showing you how brexit has contributed to the uks economic woes. As a brexiteer it isn’t surprising you don’t want to hear this but it is true nonetheless. It is also on topic.

They expect people to not make arguments they are unable to refute.

I have already said there are regulations and procedures required to be met before a referendum can take place. However to say there cannot be a referendum just because there was on before brexit is wrong. There is no legislative reason a referendum cannot take place. At no point have I claimed or implied the Scottish Parliament can override Westminster on this issue.

LOL That statement is correct. There is no legislative reason a referendum cannot happen because there was one before brexit. That correct statement in no way says or implies the Scottish Parliament can override Westminster.

As he crawls out from under his rock we see just what sort of craven creature hanniry is.

Where did I say the Scottish Parliament could override Westminster over referendums? Oh, and be specific…

I understand that it means their legal system is unique to Scotland. From the link I posted earlier “Scotland has its own independent and in parts clearly different judicial system with own jurisdiction.” Simple. https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/administrative-law/describe-some-of-the-ways-of-scottish-legal-system-law-essays.php

Thank you for confirming my assertion that Scotland has its own legal system. Not that I needed it…

Ah, can’t face facts eh. Just read and learn. Simple.

None of that changes the fact that there is no legislative reason a referendum could not happen because there was one prior to brexit. Oh, and I’ve answered those points on parliament, currency and legal system previously. They remain the same. Here’s some reading for you. Educate yourself. https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/administrative-law/describe-some-of-the-ways-of-scottish-legal-system-law-essays.php

I have. That is how I know you are incorrect as outlined in my previous post.

Incorrect. You are confusing conditions and regulations under which a referendum can take place with how often they can take place. The two are not the same.

That’s for the Scottish people to decide upon, not you.

No legislation exists that says cannot have another referendum. Not a single piece.

UK mps vote on U.K. legislation… The Westminster snp mps, as I already said, are there as Scotlands U.K. parliamentary representatives. I’m not Scottish so I really have no stake in the country’s quest for independence from the U.K.’s shackles. Though I do wish them well in this endeavour. That is for them as a nation to decide up. Simple.

Fair enough, I shouldn’t have used the word independent as Scotland is still shackled to the U.K. However, I will continue to state that Scotland with its own parliament, currency, legal system, football team is a country, because it is. The snp mps at Westminster are there as Scotlands representatives in the U.K. parliament. They represent their country there. Simple.

Nonetheless