Jump to content

bheard

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bheard

  1. I guess I don't understand why westerners come here if they don't like Thailand, I come here because its fun and a lot cheaper than back home. If Thailand gets all the same rules and regulations that we love back home it will no longer be fun or cheap.


    In fact if you dig deep you find that Thailand does have many regulations that mirror those in your home country, but it's the policing that doesn't happen.
    Now come on, 'fess up, you came here to 'interact' with Thai women didn't you?
    Rules, regulations, policing, whatever, the women are still gonna be fun!
  2. Plenty of better looking ladies to view at Asok BTS
    stand there at peak hour in the morning ,you are bound to 
    see many 7 and a few 10's 
    without all the make up, miss  “Milk” has on
     
     


    Agreed!
    Why don't they try to find a real unadulterated Thai beauty?
    Would be viewed favourably all over the world I'd say.
  3. So why do you think I live in Thailand?  An Australian pensioner can live here much better than in Oz.


    If you have an 'aged pension' from the federal govt you'd better make sure you have a plan B.
    The govt has tried once already to stop the aged pension being paid to people living overseas, but fortunately it didn't pass.
    One day . . .
    Gotta pay their own exorbitant retirement benefits somehow . . . and who better to milk than old agers?
  4. In the old days out west where I grew up when we had a problem with something we put a bounty on it. People made money by eradicating the problem . Maybe a bounty should be put on refugees. Ever one you bag is worth x amount of money.Then homeless Aussies could get money bagging refugees.
     
     I would really like to know how Australia came about to be legally responsible to refugees. Does not make sense to me. Their own home  country should be the legal responsible country. If their home country is unwilling to be responsible maybe they should have stayed home.


    When did Aus become legally responsible for refugees?
    When it put them in gaol, that's when.
    Just shows the folly of the "island solution".
    Serves the Aus govt right.
    Unfortunately the tax payer pays. As usual.
  5. I believe the policy was changed last year so that Australians (and not just G7 citizens) once again receive a 30-day visa-exempt stay if arriving by land at a border crossing, and not just by air as it had been before. However an Australian friend rang a Thai consulate there and a staffer told him:
     
    "Don't believe everything you read on the internet. I have been working here for five years and it has always been 15 days when you enter by land."
     
    Can anyone clear this up please? I could have sworn there was a Thai government announcement changing it to 30 days if by land for most Western nationalities, but now I can't find it. Thanks. 


    Just go to the Thai consulate Melbourne website. It says 15 days. Never changed in recent years.
    Nothing to "clear up". It's very clear when you read it.
  6. It's all very well saying that 'everyone must have insurance', but as already pointed out, anyone over 60 will find it both difficult and expensive to get any insurance, and if they have any pre-existing conditions, it becomes almost impossible. And how many people who come to Thailand are over 60? A high percentage, I would imagine. And they probably put more into the Thai economy than young families who don't have the same disposable income.
     
    I said this in the other thread, but the only way I see around it is to have a mandatory fee that must be paid on entry (or exit, which might be easier) by everyone - 500 Baht perhaps (500 Baht X 30 million visitors = 15 billion Baht) which would cover everyone for basic healthcare at a state hospital. The majority of visitors would prefer to have insurance that will provide a higher level of care in a private hospital, so only a small percentage would, if the need arose, have to be treated under the state scheme.
     
    It's not a perfect system, but 500 Baht is not so much that people would refuse to pay (or refuse to come to Thailand). We used to have a 500 Baht departure tax, and everyone just paid it. We may have grumbled a bit, but it wasn't a bank-breaking sum.
     
    Also, the idea of having to check everyone's insurance is just a non-starter.


    More than 500. 2000. Still way way less than I pay in Aus for travel insurance before coming to Thailand.
  7. Any foreigner living here long term and MARRIED to a Thai, should automatically have access to the Thai system for medical coverage..
    Thats the way it works in most countries as far as i know....If she is your wife (Husnband) then it's natural to be included in the country's system, of that person....if not, why not?
     

    Why? Depends on your circumstances. Maybe because you didn't contribute to the taxation system? You want to freeload on the citizens of another country?
  8. Have to sell cars or land or property in wife's name. Eventually should put back the 600,000 bt borrowed. Healthy at the moment.


    Sounds good, till she is actually put in the position.
    A friend of mine's wife was put in that position. House in ChiangMai and truck both in her name. She failed the test. He contracted cancer, she saw the writing on the wall, chose not to help, so he died.
    I hope yours does better than that.
  9. I must be out of touch, but looks to me like a couple wheel bearings in a useless configuration.. I assume it has some point though, or it is part of the younger generation on Thai Visa these days?
    Anyway Lazada surely has them and will deliver them to your door, paid on delivery.
     


    My grand daughter has one. Can't for the life of me imagine what it's for. Just sits on her dresser.
×
×
  • Create New...