Jump to content

cmsally

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cmsally

  1. That is the whole idea, in that lack of regulations and education mean it is very difficult to trace who is creating the problem.

    It is very convenient to have neighbouring countries with a large percentage of subsistence farmers, lack of education and high level of corruption.

    Thais look clean because you point at Burma and Burmese don't care because its Shan State and I suppose just there for their use as a money making trash can.

    The same of course would go for Laos.

     

    • Like 2
  2. There is already an agreement on Transboundary haze pollution (ASEAN), which seems to have failed.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/southeastasia/press/3239/a-haze-free-asean-by-2020-are-we-there-yet/

     

    If you have governments that benefit from a part of their country being handed over to corporate monoculture  and poverty, then of course they will not be screaming "Help" to Asean. This is precisely the problem, the benefits outweigh the problems for those in charge. You have to have a government that wants to stop the smoke. If you transported every single one of those in charge up to the worst of the affected areas and made them live with no AC / closing windows in the middle of the smoky season, I guarantee the air would improve overnight.

    • Like 2
  3. Nothing will happen on a regional basis  because it is not whole countries enveloped in smog.  Bangkok/S Thailand/large parts of Laos including Vientiane/S Myanmar are all largely unaffected. So they don't give a ------ what happens to large parts of their countries which are traditionally agricultural and poorer. This is why a regional solution relying on national governments will not work.

    These monopolistic governments (as well as the Chinese govt) couldn't care a less if these areas become the trash dumps of Asia.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...