Maestro

This topic is now closed.

I cleaned up the topic some more by deleting off-topic posts and the replies to them.

In the OP's case I would write an email or letter to the Consular Division (look up the correct name and address on mfa.go.th), not to rant but politely and formally "for your information", stating the facts and attaching copies of relevant correspondence, making no accusations or demands. If they get many reports about mitakes being made at that embassy, the MFA will do what is necessary to improve the service in that location.

Another thing to consider is that whereas the online application asked for that travel information, these data do not appear on the eVisa which the embassy will send you by email and to the best of my knowledge the immigration officials at the point of entry have no online access to that information.

I moved this topic from the Visa forum to General Topics.

I moved this topic from the Visa forum to General Topics.

On my screen, I am asked to select the type of "port of arrival"

Which type of "personal account" did you talk with K-Bank about, current account or savings account? It's for the current account that banks usually want to see a work permit.

1. Did you complete and and submit your eVisa application on Tuesday? 2. Have you in the meantime received your eVisa? 3. What is your planned travel date?

Removed an off-topic post and the replies to it.

Removed an off-topic post.

Removed an off-topic post and the reply to it.

Removed a troll post (nonsensical)

I am nor aware of any immigration rule, published or otherwise, on this subject.

Ubonjoe and others have mentioned that one can upload a photo or scanned copy of a sheet of paper with "not applicable" handwritten, typed or printed on it.

Trying to avoid overtourism.

It can depend on the Thai embassy or conulate where you apply. Please check what the website of your local Thai embassy says or contact them via phone or email.

Removed an off-topic post.

The way I see it, there is clearly a difference between the official guideline published on the website of the Bangkok immigration office for the the issuance of a non-O visa for a dependent of a "person having residency in Thailand (non-O) " by an immigration office and the way this guideline is interpreted and implemented by some immigration offices. One question that has been brought up is whether "residency" as used in the guideline is perhaps meant to refer to what we know as "permanent residenccy". As "residency" is used here in the context of a "person having residency in Thailand (non-O) " and as "non-O" is a short form for "non-immigrant visa category O", used not only on this forum but also on the websites of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thai consulates and the Immigration Bureau, "residency" in this context cannot mean "permanent residency" because permanent residents are in Thailand not on the basis of a non-O visa, but on the basis of an immigrant visa or a non-quota immigrant visa.

I assume you have a retirement extension under clause 2.22 of Police Order 327/2557. If this is the case, the immigration office should accept your son's application for a change of visa status to non-O and subsequently his application for a one-year extension of stay under clause 2.20(4) of the Police Order. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwNib_gx9zYEYkFjMUNHV1pXdWs/view?usp=drivesdk&resourcekey=0-HbhenggAPK_pepIDEzdVCA

Removed off-topic posts about driving licences.

For that purpose, the district office can give the executor of your will the address at which the ID card holder is registered as residing. The entry in the house registration book is linked to the ID card number.

Removed a spam post.

Removed an off-topic post.

I arrived at Suvarnabhumi airport with a new passport in January and the arrival stamp was put on page 9.