Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by candide

  1. Of course, as it is a corrupt government. If you support the party line you get subsidies and public procurement contracts and if you criticize the dear leader, you get nothing!
  2. MACO! The guy has been showing off with a chainsaw but he's a pussy!
  3. Taking "most of their land" occured in October/November 2017, so not in 4 weeks. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Islamic-State-in-Iraq-and-the-Levant/ISIS-outside-of-Iraq-and-Syria Trump himself started to declare victory in 2018. Prematurely according to some media. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ap-fact-check-trump-prematurely-declares-victory-over-islamic-state-group But feel free to show that Trump won against ISIS in 4 weeks! I am eagerly waiting for your links! 🤣
  4. Let's start with an easy one! "Trump and the battle against ISIS: Trump repeated his regular false claim that even though “they said it would take five years to defeat ISIS, we did in four weeks, four weeks.” The so-called ISIS “caliphate” was declared fully liberated more than two years into Trump’s presidency, in 2019, not “in four weeks.” 😆 The proof: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/23/middleeast/isis-caliphate-end-intl One more? 🤣
  5. Did you really expect anything else than deflect,deflect,deflect from MAGA folks? 🙂
  6. Putin's problem is a problem of timing. If he wants to invade some Baltic states (that's the obvious strategic target), he has a strategic window corresponding to Trump's mandate. He has no certainty that the next U.S. government will have the same complacency, so the strategic window will likely close at the end of Trump's mandate. Relatedly, European Countries are (akbait too slowly) increasing their military resources, so the more he waits, the higher their ability to counter him. However, because of the war in Ukraine, Russia is too weak and exhausted to finance another war during Trump's mandate. So he may not be able to take this opportunity.
  7. It was rational from his perspective. Having said that, if he had anticipated correctly the difficulty of conquering Ukraine, he may not have done it.
  8. Here's the links https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23563868-221129-ornato-gpo-j6-transcript-ctrl0000929721/ https://scribd.com/document/617878128/Anthony-Ornato-Transcript-Nov-29 Which tape? It's been completely debunked. Post your link!
  9. You obviously forgot to mention that the offer discussed on the phone was to protect the protesters, not to protect the Capitol. You also forgot that Trump watched the assault on TV, and did not call the NG guard to stop it! 🤣
  10. Blah blah! It's a ridiculous debunked lie! Pelosi never rejected an offer to use the NG, made by Trump. 🤣
  11. Come on, not that ridiculous debunked MAGA propaganda lie again! 🤣
  12. In your dreams only! 🤣
  13. Exactly. Most terrorist attacks in Europe, the U.S. and also Africa have been made by people brainwashed in Salafi mosques.
  14. When Trump imposes tariffs stock markets go down, when he chickens out, they go up! That's what I thought! The TACO principle.
  15. Because Trump chickened out!
  16. I cannot tell you because you put me on ignore! As most people who could have told you!
  17. I guess I don't need to comment!
  18. Approve is the sum of strongly and somewhat, etc...
  19. Not fake, you are ridiculously trolling again. Are you really that ignorant? I just use basic Android features: screen copy and redimensioning function from the gallery. And I always put the links so everyone can check the data.
  20. Another failed attempt at being humorous from you! Your ignorance about softwares and apps has not improved, because Office is absolutely not needed to do it and has not been used.
  21. Latest Economis/Yougov poll Note the differences in the "strongly" approve and disaprove scores https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/explore/topic/The_Economist_YouGov_polls https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econtoplines_jXkGqJ1.pdf
  22. And here you are again playing the confusion card and trying to sneak in unrelated news. Your link is about immigration, not the China travel ban, and it's from April. Then you cited Pelosi who went to Chinatown to provide moral support to Asian American businesses as people were afraid to eat or shop there. And she was right at that time that it was as safe as other district. As you know, the first Covid cases in the area did not occur in Chinatown. You wrote: "he blocked travel from china and you all called him xenophobic". Where the quotes proving your claim! It 's a lie!
  23. The article you linked was about Biden in May 2020! 🙂 So if there are plenty of articles from 2020, showing that Democrats "all called him xenophobic" because of the China travel ban (not the Muslim ban) and quoting Democrats saying the China travel ban was xenophobic, it should be easy for you to link them. Why don't you do it instead of an article about Biden supporting Asian Americans (if I remember well, hate crimes against Asian Americans increased during the pandemic). So why don't you link these articles which can easily found with Google? 🙂
  24. Lol! You have not shown any quote of Biden talking about the China travel ban, because you are not able to find one. And you try to sneak in a lame comment by the the hill "some in the left" what a joke! Show a quote of Biden or shut up!
×
×
  • Create New...