candide

Election Watch is a gop conspiracy theory outlet! Come back when you have anything from the FEC or a court! You have only the GOP conspiracy BS. 😀

So what's Trump program to reduce debt? Tax cuts?

Sure! It's the Dems who assaulted the Capitol and plotted fake electors lists, etc...in order to overturn the election results! 😀

O'Keefe, seriously? "Election watch", that sounds good, except that it's a GOP propaganda outlet. More about the so-called money laundering B.S.: 😀 https://marylandmatters.org/2023/06/20/expert-claims-of-campaign-finance-irregularities-are-dubious/

Simple. Because she's being compared to Trump! 😀

You are making up stuff again. 😀 You have no evidence that Generation Lab did not follow a reliable methodology.

A crappy site (amgreatness.com 😃) hidden behind a title, and citing O'Keefe! https://marylandmatters.org/2023/06/20/expert-claims-of-campaign-finance-irregularities-are-dubious/

Once again, a post with a dubious argumentation. You haven't provided any evidence that Generation Lab is not a reliable polling organisation. The sample is representative of the young population, which means It's not only composed of students. Actually, their sample is more reliable as it is only composed of young people (804), while they represent only a part of the Quinnipiac University sample which is about the whole population (1257 for the whole population)). In short, they have surveyed more young people than Quinnipiac University. Note that I did not claim that Quinipiac University was not reliable. I wrote that Fox News selected this particular poll. Poll results may vary according to their methodology, their sample, etc... That's why no conclusion can definitely be drawn from only one poll.

It leads to the opposite conclusion. In a corrupt country there is no way a ban can be enforced as it"s always possible to bribe. Banning cannabis would actually extend the scope of corruption.

Of course, you are showing the results of the poll selected by Fox News! 😀 Other polls show a different opinion. "But in a Harris-Trump contest, the same respondents split 60% for Harris and 40% for Trump — a 20-point lead for Harris." https://www.axios.com/2024/07/25/poll-harris-biden-trump-young-voters

It's obvious that Trump is getting old! Only 22 times! 😀

Trump is a coward. He's like those little dogs who always bark. 😀

Lol! Hillary won the popular vote! Her problem was not the number of votes, it was the geographical distribution of votes. 😀

Making stuff up, as usual. 😀

The most ridiculous aspect of this nonsense is the believe that Trump will do anything else than lining the pocket of his sponsor and familly.

I heard that aluminium foils glued on walls actually work quite well.... 😀

More assault on the first amendment! 😃

Orban, the strong independent leader who whines when EU subsidies are freezed! 😅

The idea of Frexit has been buried in 2017, after observing the mess caused by the Brexit decision.😅 As to the rest of your post (and your previous posts), it reflect your ignorance of EU institutions, scope, and how the EU works,

The usual B.S. from you.

In a Trump win, economists see revived inflation and a more wary Fed "A wide range of economists see Trump's tariff agenda, coupled with aims to deport millions of undocumented workers and the likelihood of expanded deficits, reigniting price pressures that are now easing and likely driving the Fed to react with more restrictive monetary policy than is now penciled in." https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/trump-win-economists-see-revived-inflation-more-wary-fed-2024-07-25/

Please stop distorting what I wrote. I wrote that most of those who were Republican at that time (and were still able to vote) also voted for Trump.

Trump cultist talking about religion! 😃

When the right-wing starts talking about rigged election, you know that they are worried about losing it. 🤣

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/03/14/a-look-back-at-how-fear-and-false-beliefs-bolstered-u-s-public-support-for-war-in-iraq/