-
Posts
18,384 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by candide
-
I don't deny it and it was just a peripheral comment. My point in response to Hanaguma's statement that Palestinian are more happy in Israel is that It's true but: - those who are outside are not allowed back, - the current territory under the Palestinian administration is not sustainable from an economic perspective, because it is too fragmented and because the most wealthy parts (ex the Jordan valley) are controlled by Israel. Difficult to be happy under such circumstances. I will not get drawn by you into any other issue you may come up with.
-
10,000 in Iran, but never mind. Yet there is no international law or principle stating that people who have fled or were expelled from war zone, whatever the reason, should not be allowed back. And one bad does not justify another bad.
-
Changing target now. There is no internation law or principle which says that people fleeing or being expelled from combat zone have no right to come back.
-
Ok but as I said, It's not an excuse.
-
It's bad but it's not an excuse. (Not sure they are not allowed to go back to all ME countries, BTW. A significant part of the Jewish exodus has been voluntary) .
-
Those who fled or were expelled during the 1947–49 war, and the Six-Day War were not/ are not allowed to come back. In addition, what has been left to the Palestians is not sustainable from an economic point of view, as the most wealthy parts are controlled by Israel, in particular the Jordan valley.
-
Assault on Kiev: Russian helicopters swoop above Ukraine's capital
candide replied to Chris.B's topic in The War in Ukraine
Ukraine says Russia's putting inflatable tanks on the battlefield — but the decoys deflated ???? https://news.yahoo.com/ukraine-says-russias-putting-inflatable-024429192.html -
Not to mention posters on this forum claiming they were both in underwear.
-
What DePape stated was reported pretty quickly. In any case, when someone targets Nancy Pelosi, it's not a wild guess to assume It's political. Anyway, it has been confirmed that it was political.
-
So, in brief, a peace agreement which is not a peace agreement, and a peace plan which is not a peace plan. ????
-
Ahem! They are not allowed to go back there.
-
A great idea from Trump. As the Israelis and the Palestinians don't agree with each other, let's negotiate the plan only with Netanyahu! ???? The plan had been delayed by two years and previously rejected by the Palestinians, who were not invited to the meeting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_peace_plan
-
There's something fishy about this investigation! Durham should be investigated! "Mr. Durham used Russian intelligence memos — suspected by other U.S. officials of containing disinformation — to gain access to emails of an aide to George Soros, the financier and philanthropist who is a favorite target of the American right and Russian state media. Mr. Durham used grand jury powers to keep pursuing the emails even after a judge twice rejected his request for access to them. The emails yielded no evidence that Mr. Durham has cited in any case he pursued." https://electionlawblog.org/?p=134470
-
That was long time ago. The cooperation started in 2010. Israel had not been considered as an enemy for years before the normalization agreement. "Israel–United Arab Emirates relations had been jagged and fueled by mutual distrust and hatred for several decades, but in the 2010s, the countries' informal relations improved considerably and they began engaging in extensive unofficial cooperation based on their joint opposition to Iran's nuclear program and regional influence.[1][2] In 2015, Israel opened an official diplomatic mission in Abu Dhabi to the International Renewable Energy Agency.[3][4][5]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel–United_Arab_Emirates_relations
-
It was a cooperation or normalisation agreement, so nice for them. However They did not make peace because they were not in conflict. An agreement between Israel and parties in conflict, such as Syria, Iran or the Palestinians, could be called a peace agreement, but it Didn't happen.
-
It's you who is diffusing baseless conspiracy theories.
-
On top of not being neighbouring, these countries were not in conflict with Israel. No previous conflict => no peace agreement
-
So now you change target, It's not any more the left, it's me. ???? If you had read my posts and those of other non right-wing posters (see the first page of this thread, for example), the content was that it was ridiculous from the right-wing to be outraged, and that there are more important issues. This thread would have died if right-wing posters had not continuously trying to derail it by pretending it was the left which was outraged, and also by pushing a ridiculous conspiracy theory. So It's a non issue and It's a ridiculous conservative outrage. Then why are right-wing members continuously posting in this thread In order to distract attention from the conservatives? Get a life!