candide

So now you say he had an impact on the economy. Other developped countries in the same global economic context also increased their debt level similarly, but didn't obtain the same growth (ex UK). Biden is not responsible for deaths in the world. It's a ridiculous and childish claim. Inflation is a global phenomenon and all countries have been affected. Sorry to bother you with facts. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/WLD/world/inflation-rate-cpi The U.S. enjoyed the best economic recovery among comparable countries, by far. And as usual, when you lack factual arguments, you come up with lame personal attacks! 😆

Blah blah,

Exactly, Why are you still awake? 🙂

The economy is influenced by policies. It's also influenced by the global economy. Thanks for showing your ignorance.

Only an idiot would claim that he did nothing good!

So when it's good, it has nothing to do with Biden, and when it's bad, it has all to do with Biden? That's a ridiculous claim! 😆

Facts seem to have a left-wing bias! 😆

Naah, he just got 2 to 3 times more GDP growth than other G7 countries 😆 And also: Record unemployment decrease and job creation Inflation reduced last year, leading to interest rate cuts by the Fed. Record energy production and exports Russia weakened without the WW3 predicted by fear mongers, which resulted in the collapse of the Syrian regime Development of infrastructures and industry, Etc.... https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn02784/

You're so predictable, go back to your ideology.

So you consider that only the events you cherry pick must be considered. That's what I thought!

I'm not particularly a fan of both UK politicians, but there's absolutely no comparison with Trump's erratic logorrhea! 🙂

You mean like MAGA circular posting? 😆

I replied precisely about what I believed. When and about what. The "when" is important as facts come up at different times. Ex Kamala, the poll survey results changed over time, asnd my "belief" followed. And your question has nothing to do with what I was discussing before you invited yourself (you are still welcome) And I have also proven that I have been right on plenty other occasions. Or are you claiming that the reliability of posters' beliefs should be only be measured according to events selectively cherry picked by you? 🙂 There is a serious flaw in your methodology! Are you also claiming that posters should be censored on any subject because of which side they favoured during the election? In this perspective, MAGA posters should have been censored during four years because they believed that Trump would win the 2020 election! 😆

Your indirect allusions supports my claim about lies! USAID paid $44,000 to Politico for subscriptions in 2024. USAID paid $44K to Politico, not over $8M as White House claimed. It was for subscriptions https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/usaid-payments-to-politico/

I'm not a fact denier. I did not deny the laptop story after it had been assessed by reliable sources. I am a Russian interference guy. I am a Trump is mentally worse than Biden guy. I did initially think that Kamala would mop Trump, until a few weeks before the election and polls started to show a Trump win. Happy? Which has nothing to do with the lab leak theory. Currently facts are: "While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan, where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019". Of course, if new facts emerge, I would alter my subjective probability assessment, in one direction or the other. I also wasn't a Trump will bring down price of food immediately guy, a Trump will get a peace deal even before being inaugurated guy, a Crowdstrike is an Ukrainian company guy, a Covid-19 is a Dem hoax guy, a Covid 19 is just a flu guy, a FD-1023 guy, a Durham investigation guy, a Kraken guy, a Trump won the election guy, a Pizzagate guy,etc... Just to name a few! 🙂

Not with tweets, with real facts from reliable sources! 🙂

Good thing you are only making an empty comment.

Which is all lies again! 🙂 Buying subscriptions is not subsidizing.

It's not what I was discussing, but, as I wrote just before, the lab leak theory has neither been proven nor disproved. In the article you linked yourself, it is mentioned: "While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan, where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019". Personally, I would thinks the odds are around 70% zoonotic origin vs 30% lab leak origin. Of course that's a subjective probability.

Then you are incoherent because you replied to a discussion which was exactly about the fact that the Covid-19 virus cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco-health program. The alternative explanation being that you were intentionally deflecting from the particular issue I was addressing.

You still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆 And you are still posting lame deflections! 😆

Stop pretending that you did not understand the point I was addressing! Where is it written in this article that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses used in the eco health program? 😆 The point I was precisely addressing is that the viruses used in the eco-health program cannot be the progenitors of the Covid-19 virus, 😆 I did not address the lab leak theory in general, which is neither proven nor disproved. It may be that the Covid19 was leaked (or not) but it cannot originate from the viruses used in the eco health program. Feel free to post your scientific evidence that the Covid 19 virus originates from the specific viruses usec in the eco health program! I'm not holding my breath again! 🤣

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆 And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆 Should I add that your are trolling? 🤣

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆 And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆

Like you said, you still have nothing to support the claim that the Covid-19 virus originates from the viruses used in the eco-health program, despite the fact that they cannot be genetically progenitors! 😆 And you just repeat the same lame deflections like a broken record!😆