candide

In 2023, about 423.9 billion U.S. dollars worth of goods were exported from Russia. So it's around 1% of Russia's exports. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263663/export-of-goods-from-russia/

It confirms what I quoted. Thank you.

Well, as he's now President and there's been no ceasefire before that, everyone with a brain is able to find out he was lying.

$500 billion is the total amount by the 5 investors. And Musk raised doubts about their capacity to invest that amount (he may be right or not).

True. We've just seen the price of food brought down immediately! 😆

They (and Trump) will blame the deep state or whoever else can be blamed for that. We can expect more whining. You know like: 'they' did not let him apply his program B.S.!

Trump has decided to show his strength to Russia! "IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE. If we don't make a 'deal,' and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries," Trump added. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-warns-putin-hell-next-164849382.html Ahem! What does the U.S. currently imports from Russia? 🙂

Facts. It seems you don't like them. There had been no attempt to bring missiles closer to Russia. NATO could have put missiles in Poland etc, it would have been just as dangerous for Russia as in Ukraine. It didn't. There was no plan to do so. Not an indicator of threat. Apart from the U.S., the share of NATO countries' defense budgets have been declining over decades. They have been criticized as being too weak and peace oriented. Not an indicator of threat. U.S. military presence in Europe has been declining for decades. Not an indicator of threat. This is just Russian propaganda.

Yet, these are the available facts. You may, or may not, be right about the future of twitter/X. It 's not fact yet.

Most does not only includes U.S. voters.

A lame propaganda argument. NATO has not brought missiles closer to Russian border since the cold war. Thet stayed where they were and there was no intent to bring them closer. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/nuclear-weapons-europe-mapping-us-and-russian-deployments

Basically brainwashed by facts! 😆 https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/

Most people understand that Trump was lying, as usual! 😆

Happy now? https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542

He's currently busy bringing down the price of food immediately. That's for tomorrow! 🤣

During the debate with Kamala, he said: “That is a war that’s dying to be settled. I will get it settled before I even become president,” 😆 https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-promised-hed-end-war-093153407.html

Putin thinks it's a very good idea! 😆

Trump had the opportunity to make a dignified speech, for his first day. He spoilt it because he cannot stop whining and lying! 😆 https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/jan/20/live-fact-check-trump-inauguration-day-president/ https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2025/01/20/donald-trump-inauguration-fact-check-live-updates/77727712007/ https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/19/politics/fact-check-trump-false-claims-election-immigration-dc-rally/index.html

You still have nothing...

There is proof of interference. Even the GOP led Senate committee admitted it. No one knows whether it had any influence on the result of the election or not. Again you distort what I posted. Unlike you about the 2020 election. I make no unbacked claim of rigged election in 2016. The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help. https://apnews.com/article/ap-top-news-international-news-elections-politics-campaigns-5e833a62e9492f6a66624b7920cc846a

Don't distort what I wrote. I wrote Russian interference and it's been evidenced. Collusion was neither proven nor disproved in the Mueller report.

Giuliani had it for around one year already. He could have disclosed it much earlier, could have given it to all MSMs so that they could assess it. He pathetically tricked himself by trying to play too smart! 😆

That was during the Weiss investigation. I wrote it in another post. Since when is it allowed to disclose publicly the content of material obtained under a Grand Jury subpoena? Or to anyone without a court decision? If I'm wrong (it happens) can you cite the article(s) allowing it. What characteristic of the way the laptop content was brought to the the attention of the general public was likely to raise trust in it?

You can repeat the big lie as often as you want, it won't make it true!

And the loser Giuliani tricked himself into it by trying to be smarter than he really is! 😆