candide

The day after he brings the price of food down! 😆

They already have a target on their head by the Israeli (and we all know how efficient they can be). Would they think that Trump may be a greater tnreat to them than the Israeli? 😆

You mean like bombing Irak for the attack on the Twin Towers? 🤣 ISIS and Iran are ennemies. ISIS is known for slaughtering Iran-backed Shia.

I would not be surprised if it's a Salafi mosque. ISIS is a Suni movement and ISIS related terrorists have often been brainwashed in Salafi mosque.

"When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one," he vowed. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/donald-trump-says-reason-he-won-last-months-presidential-election Impatiently waiting for this to happen on day one!

Projecting much...

Prepare for continuous whining from Trump, blaming the deep state, etc.. as well as lame excuses from MAGA rubes such as "they did not let him apply his program" B.S. 😆

Congress Forced the Sale of Excess Parts In selling the leftover parts of the southern border wall, the Biden administration was complying with legislation introduced by Rep. Mike Rogers, a Republican from Alabama, and signed into law Dec. 22, 2023. Section 2890 of the law, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, compelled the DOD to submit a plan "to use, transfer, or donate" all "excess construction materials on southwest border" no later than 75 days after the enactment of the law, and to start executing the plan no later than 100 days after submitting the plan, "until the date on which the Department of Defense is no longer incurring any costs to maintain, store, or protect the covered materials." https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-biden-selling-off-203500923.html

You mean he will not bring food price down immediately and end the Ukraine war even before he takes office? Oh noooo...

Oh the hypocrisy.... As we will see, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) had indeed been selling leftover border wall materials. However, the sale began in June 2024, months before Trump was elected. Not only was the move legal, it was required by legislation introduced by a Republican lawmaker and enacted in December 2023. https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-biden-selling-off-203500923.html

You don't get it, really?

When was the last time someone who visited the Queen and/or a President of a country posted on AN forum? 😆

Let's hope this time he won't borrow his butler's costume! 😆 https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/donald-trump-queen-elizabeth-buckingham-palace-keir-starmer-theresa-may-b1192358.html

Ah, OK.

Talking about teleprompters (in case it was really because of a faulty teleprompter). "Our Army manned the air, it rammed the ramparts, it took over the airports, it did everything it had to do, and at Fort McHenry, under the rocket's red glare it had nothing but victory." 😆 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-blames-teleprompter-revolutionary-war-airports-flub-n1026931

It's absolutely meaningless. BRICS is neither an alliance nor a trade zone. A lame tactic to hide the fact that Russia represents only 3.55% of global gdp. 😆

Actually, talking about lab-leaked is obscuring the real issue, which is natural evolution.ution vs created by researchers. - natural evolution, whether from the Wuhan market or leaked from the samples collected by the lab. It seems to be currently the dominant scientific explanation. - created by researchers in a lab (then leaked). This is currently not the dominant scientific explanation.

The topic is the WHO and I keep focused on it. Sorry if I don't follow you on every digression you are addressing. And sorry if I stick to facts. I can understand it's may be kind of boring g for you. You keep making baseless claims about the WHO, and when proven wrong you start splitting hairs. Like you just did. When you make claims on this forum, it's your duty to back up these claims, and not me to waste my time disproving each and every of your claims. I have provided the list of experts, and they appear to be quite qualified and experienced. If you want to challenge their qualification, prove it. It's not my job to disprove any baseless speculation you may come up with.

Thanks for this usefull timeline. Two remarks: - It provides insights on politicians' statements or institutional positions, but actually few scientific substance (ok, that was not the aim), - a reminder that the lab-leaked theory is not restricted to the artificially created virus option. Quote from the article "The theory’s adherents usually believe the coronavirus either evolved in nature and was being studied at a lab in Wuhan before it accidentally leaked out, or was artificially created by researchers before it escaped—though the latter theory has been heavily contested by many experts.

Have you looked at the lists? Here are the first two names on the first list. Dr Didier Houssin President AP-HP International, Subsidiary of Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris France Members Dr Martin Cetron Director, Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention UNITED STATES OF AMERICA If it's not enough for you, I guess you are able to use Google and find more details, such as below: Dr. Didier Houssin President of the French Evaluation Agency for Research and Higher Education (AERES), since May 2011. Former Director General for Health, France Ministry of Health (2005-2011). A Surgery Professor at Paris's Descartes University since 1988, Professor Housin returned recently to the Research and higher education Fields after many years in the Public Health sector. A liver surgery and transplant Specialist, including for children, he served as Executive Director of the Établissement Français des Greffes (the French transplant agency) from 1994 to 2003, as surgery Head at Paris's Cochin hospital, from 1998 to 2003, as the Paris Hospitals' medical policy Director, from 2003 to 2005, and as Health Director General at the French Ministry of Health in March 2005, a position he kept until May 2011. During this last period, he was also the interministerial delegate for Pandemic Influenza in France. Professor Houssin has a wide ranging experience in the research and higher education: researcher fields at the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (1982-1988), as university surgeon leading a surgical research laboratory (1985-1996), and director of the French national doctoral training in surgical sciences (1991-1995). He authored several original scientific publications on liver transplants and surgery, transplant immunology, and gene therapy, as well as two books: a document on Organ transplantation and an essay on the phenomenon of Emergenc

My comment on Ivermectin was about Covid-19. I did not comment about ither use. Every time I replied to you, you have been proven wrong. More coming later.

Long story... https://www.printables.com/model/480941-horten-ho-229-ww2-era-german-flying-wing-fighter-j

Too long to reply to all your comments at the same time, so let's start with the most simple one. You are again showing your ignorance of the WHO despite making definitive judgments about it. You just need to look at its website. https://www.who.int/groups/covid-19-ihr-emergency-committee https://www.who.int/groups/covid-19-infection-prevention-and-control-guidance-development-group https://www.who.int/about/governance/executive-board (the positions are rotated at the board, so it may not be the same persons as in 2020/21).

Not much, it seems.... "Five years ago, China expressed hopes for increased collaboration with the Nordic states in the Arctic. Chinese investments in Nordic mineral resources are still minimal, however, and none of the ambitious infrastructure projects discussed have come to fruition. The backlash against China in recent years has undoubtedly hindered its investment prospects in the region." https://kinacentrum.se/en/publications/the-recent-backlash-against-china-in-the-nordic-arctic-prospects-for-future-chinese-engagement-in-the-region/ China failed its Arctic ambitions in Greenland It appears both the West and Beijing itself have grossly overestimated Chinese expansion in Greenland. https://www.politico.eu/article/china-arctic-greenland-united-states/

Complete B.S., as usual! 😆 United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES‑11/1 is a resolution of the eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly, adopted on 2 March 2022. It deplored Russia's invasion of Ukraine and demanded a full withdrawal of Russian forces and a reversal of its decision to recognise the self-declared People's Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. UN General Assembly The tenth paragraph of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution of 2 March 2022 confirmed the involvement of Belarus in unlawful use of force against Ukraine.[1] The resolution was sponsored by 96 countries, and passed with 141 voting in favour, 5 against, and 35 abstentions