frank83628

yes, all over cnn and the MSM at the time

just as there are no real biden followers, so not the most popular president in history at all. The same cannot be said for MAGA..... well, i guess at least theyre loyal.

but but but Trump...! if the media are not covering for Biden on this i can only imagine that there is another candidate in the wings and they will slowly turn on him to then push that person. wonder how many here claiming Biden to be a super hero no will flip flop when that happens!!

feel free to look back through the thread. i dont have enough interest to be honest.

he bvlamed his staff for doing it if you listen

you pal Chomper wrote this about biden in court..... Entirely reasonable for anyone to present themselves to a jury in a way that garners sympathy.

so he deceived the court then..or lied..... so which? and then bruch it away... hahas, yep, typical

nah, it hasnt, but thats ok, you make excuses for your guy...

great to see how many jump to Bidens defense despite what the report says.... and then claim trump supporters are in a cult !!.. haha, if only you can see yourselves.,,,, will be amusing to see when the MSM starts to slowly turn against Joe just how long you guys will stick with him, i expect you'll jump ship as soon as a new candidates name gets mentioned. but but but trump!!

hey...its the TDS king, back again i see, saying exactly the same thing as previously said..word for word

stutter wasnt so prevalent before he took office now was it!

so lying then

Hillary Killton denied DT was a legitimate president many times, as did the msm by pushing the russian collusion BS, which was undermining democracy, exactly what the TDS members claim trump was doing.... it's all getting a tad boring now.

still not seen and anser regarding undermining dem same applies to you if you dont think it's being used to attack Trump and stop him running

so trump and putin colluded to cheat the election in order to build a hotel...

would you accept the daily wire or newsmax if i posted articles from them?

doesn't mention the trump campaign at all.

so just brush off 2billion in damages, 30+ dead.. against some unarmed people walking around the capital., some being escorted by police....

ABC news, politico and wiki... well, thats it then, case closed, lock stock and barrel!! proof form the most trust worthy outlets

'whataboutary' seems to be your goto word when avoiding answering simple questions

page link doesnt exist

ok, but kilton still denied trumps presidency ... as did the MSM, so is that not undermining democracy ? seems a hard question for a couple of you to answer

no, dont get too excited, and no, i am not agreeing with anything i was asking 'IF'. so.. IF you say there was then what are they? saying someone had links isn't proof they were in cahoots with Putin and it was untoward, to what level are these links, it makes a huge difference?? A bought a car from B is not Russian collusion. A spoke to B in their political capacity is not Russian collusion... if A took money from B for political influence then thats i think that a bit dodgy.... so what was it?

i haven't seen any explanation, so i asked the question. i asked anothe rmember who seems to have avoided it so far...lets wait n see

she said it, was it once?...... there are many other appearances she's made where she has said he was illegitimate. and the difference..well... in 2016 did the dems change the voting system and push mail in ballots, NO, were there so many irregularities in the count in 2016, NO..... and is there an unedited version of him speaking at this time? or perhaps one from a right wind site, pretty sure there would be differences between the 2