khunjeff

A convicted felon who is the son of a fugitive convicted felon...a typical Thai political dynasty.

https://www.nationthailand.com/in-focus/national/40019492

Congratulations on getting your visa! May I ask what type of insurance (or in-lieu-of-insurance) documentation you submitted?

Good to see that the authorities are still laser-focused on the most important crimes, rather than wasting their time on silly things like reckless driving, fraud, or corruption.

"The Army also spent 7.5 million baht last year for tests on 757 of its GT200 devices, which were reportedly conducted to support its lawsuit against the supplier." Wow, still sending good money after bad. It's been acknowledged that the devices are completely fraudulent, and all you have to do is open each one to see that they are hollow plastic boxes containing no electronics or machinery of any kind, and yet they somehow managed to spend 10k baht per device to "test" them ????

The story as presented is utterly incomprehensible, but I'm pretty confident that gems selling for $52 million are not "worth $1 billion".

"a legal vacuum exists when it comes to the use of cannabis" Or, to phrase it differently, the use of cannabis is not illegal! Some other areas where "a legal vacuum exists": - speaking French in public - wearing hats - snoring - eating pretzels

Uh huh, sure...

Well, the yellow line is nowhere close to one meter from the edge, and I feel fairly confident that she didn't intend to faint. What surprises me is that the fall from the platform didn't leave her seriously injured - that's a hard drop onto steel and concrete.

Assuming the business is properly registered, eliminating rent-seeking middlemen would seem to be a net gain for consumers...but a loss for the middlemen themselves, of course.

The article is mostly utter claptrap. In Bangkok, street stalls, small restaurants, and even mall restaurants always have many Thais - usually office workers - eating alone. It's totally normal, and no one bats an eye.

Umm, that's explained in some detail in the actual article... Exactly. In his quest for 15 minutes of fame, the eminent attorney seems to have completely overlooked the fact that none of these people are actually attempting to impersonate students - it's like the difference between putting on a pilot's uniform for a Halloween party and putting one on to try to access the secure area of an airport.

From one brief event at one location.

"Screening points" is referring to the security check upstairs. Each security zone (2 & 3) has two sides, east and west, so they're closing one side at a time to replace the equipment. The immigration area on the floor below shouldn't be affected.

These days I usually park at Mixt since the location is so convenient, but there is also free parking across Phahonyothin road next to the BTS and MRT entrances (the former site of the old Mor Chit bus station). The downsides there are that it's not covered, and you'll probably have to make several rounds before you find an empty space.

Of course it's a scandal - there's video evidence of the national flag carrier violating aviation safety regulations in a way that could have endangered passengers in case of an emergency.

Since Concourse D is part of the terminal, I'm somewhat confused as to what this actually means...

Yes, those road safety "campaigns" are soooooo effective ????

He's been making the same announcement regularly for the last few weeks, but so far we have seen no names, no photos, and no actual arrests or charges.

And yet the photo shows yellow plate taxis, so what are they really talking about? In Bangkok, at least, green plates are for chauffeur-driven cars from hotel fleets and the like, not for "taxis".

Most (if not all) Thai banks let you make cardless withdrawals from ATMs using their app - no plastic card needed. I was issued an ATM card, but have never used it.

Where are the names of the charged officers, and the photos of them sitting with their heads bowed and Big Joke pointing at them? If these were foreigners arrested for littering, there would have been a massive press conference with huge vinyl boards detailing their crimes and 15 police heroes standing at attention behind them.

The fact that you were dealing with the Border Patrol and not state or local police tells us that it is not "exactly the same thing". The random searches you experienced were only allowed because you were within 100 miles of an international border - they would be forbidden anywhere in the interior of the US.

That's certainly a fair and balanced description of the typical American tourist...in 1966 or so. You forgot to mention that they always fly on Pan Am and receive letters at the American Express office!

They aren't in jail for charging her, they're in jail for "dereliction of duty" for NOT charging her.