FruitPudding

Any flag. What does it matter?

No description of the murderer?

Nothing gets passed you, does it? What difference does it make if it's a pride flag, British flag, Confederate flag, or Palestine flag? The topic is the same: someone getting killed over a flag.

The dispute in question was over a flag.

Just making the point that we shouldn't always jump to conclusions. Two people had an argument and unfortunately it resulted badly. There's a lot of conjecture about bigoted attacks on minorities

The tipping practice here is, to not tip. There's no tipping culture here, though in tourist areas they expect it. I tip for certain things, like an exceptionally good Thai massage or a good haircut. That's about it.

Let's not jump to conclusions: when a Christian school was massacred by an LGBTQ woman who even wrote a manifesto, the official stance was, "It's not clear at this time what the motive was."

They're allowed to drive kid's motorbikes - like the Honda Click - and girls' cars - like the Toyota Yaris, aren't they? I think they get their license off the back of their Milo cereal box at around that age. โตแล้ว!

Please.....I am not the one mocking this guy's misfortune

Yeah, this place is a viper's nest, man.

Honestly, mate, you deserve all the bad things that are coming to you, too. Just remember that that.

I get that the internet can bring out the worst out in people- myself included - but it is beyond my comprehension how so many posters so far in this thread are mocking this person's misfortune for their own gratification. Absolutely vile and sickening talk, guys. You really ought to stand in the corner and have a word with yourselves.

It never ceases to amaze me what a viper pit this place is A naive person gets duped out of a lot of money and many Thaivisa members crawl out of their hiding places to mock him for self satisfaction. Makes you wonder how sad their own lives are.

It's mutual. 50/50. Why is it just the man who has to be held responsible? Thanks for keeping us informed. Well, we don't all have sex with young girls. And you are being a bit melodramatic. I do think safe sex is smart, but I would do it for my own benefit, not because of some tree-hugging Gandhi BS. I've done plenty of charitable deeds in Thailand, I can assure you............but saving a ho ain't one of them (back on topic). To be honest, the topic is kinda humorous: they became hoes to earn 50k a month. What do they need saving from?? They earn more than most farang English teachers here and it's more than a Western pension.

That's the nature of them. If they didn't want an STD they should have used condoms. This is the solution, not blaming other people, ????

They should just have safe sex. They only have themselves to blame. He should just have had safe sex then. He only has himself to blame. Yes, it does become their business, obviously, because they didn't practice safe sex. Again - hard to understand, lol - it's each person's own responsibility to practice safe sex. Or not. Up to them! Their body. Their choice. It is not an ethical issue unless you knowingly give something to someone.

Well, each to their own. That's that person's business. Why are you concerned? Condoms. It's that simple. Up to you, as they say. It's up to them too. It's their choice to have unsafe sex. We each have a responsibly to take care of ourselves (and our own). Up to them, if they want to practice unsafe sex.

No, lol. She gets treatment

Nope, but their mother is. And all pregnant women get a syphilis test now very early on in their pregnancy. That's up to the doctors. It's really not my concern. I look out for strangers as much as they look out for me. Obviously, I would never knowingly give someone something, but besides that......how is this my business? They are grown ups. Do you feel so bad if some gets another disease from you accidentally? Flu? Bronchitis? Strep? Staph? Pneumonia? COVID? Generally these cause more deaths than STDs, by the way. Why not? What's the difference, besides location?

Yes, you are wrong. Syphilis can be cured in all stages. I think you may be getting mixed up with the stages in which it can/cannot be passed on to others: After the early symptoms go away, you cannot pass it on to others, as it is only transmittable when the infectious primary and secondary lesions are present (within first year) This is correct - as it is a virus, not a bacteria.

Spreading what around? An STD he has no symptoms of?? I get that things can be asymptomatic, but why is he morally obligated to get tested for this reason? That's putting the cart before the horse. And how can others magically get it from him anyway? Have they never heard of safe sex? Or abstinence? What you are basically saying is: He is morally obligated to be periodically tested (without symptoms) to prevent transmission of hypothetical asymptomatic infection to others -- whom are willing to recklessly practice unsafe sex with him? People have such irrational standards for STDs.

How so?

How subjective. So, the government can just decide what they think is a lie and have it removed? Apparently, they can............and do. Are you actually okay with that?

Brain, please. How am I supposed to give an example when the information was censored? Doh ???? ???? By definition: I was not allowed to get that information, so how can I tell you about it? But Facebook admitted it was going on.

You seem to not mind governments censoring information. The mind boggles. I, on the other hand, think information should not be kept from the people and there should be freedom of speech without censorship. Lack of comprehension? One of the traits of a fascist government is to.........drum roll please........censor information !