earlinclaifornia

“We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China,” Trump said on CNBC's "Squawk Box." “It’s going to be just fine.”

This is him in real action mag

47 minutes ago, candide said:

So where is information acceptable, according to you? 

My bet is his news source is from Breitbart News

3 hours ago, BobBKK said:

Accusing TVF members of lying is against rules - please be respectful. There will be continued and new investigations about this matter, in fact one was announced yesterday. I simply do not believe the spin you have placed on the Biden piece and I await the conclusion of further investigations into the Biden's whitewash. 

I caught a lie from a cult member and was admonished for calling him a liar So I know first hand the rules. I did post the truth later so I felt exonerated.

7 hours ago, mogandave said:

What positions do they hold? 

Senior advisors to the President

The only real NEWS is will  dundee48 find himself confused or needing a good laugh. Stay tuned.

The witness vote will decide the Senate. The House is a Democratic increase with so many Republicans retiring or not running again 2018 and stronger

5 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

What part of the timing to get the SCOUS tiing is so diffucut to understand. Point in question the repease of his taxes is schudled for April I recall. Waiting for these issues to get court judgement is no timely possible!

Ahh, still confused. I know this technical stuff is hard for some to grasp.

8 hours ago, Kelsall said:

Thank you, President Trump.

8 hours ago, Kelsall said:

Thank you, President Trump.

The baht will soar when he is voted out!

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Sorry you did not understand my sarcasm. I want witnesses as much as anybody.

My appogy I do have the occasional brain fart.

1 hour ago, mogandave said:

So because “most” of your attorney friends say something that proves it? What do your attorney friend that not agree say? 

 

Most of my attorney friends agree that the way the House handled the hearings made it a sham. 

 

I never said witnesses weren’t needed, I said additional witnesses should not be needed If the House had done their job.

 

Why did the House not take the time to get the documents and witnesses they wanted? 

Do you not understand the legnth of going thru the court system. trump has a lifetime history of dragging out in the court of law then folding.

20 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

Can you quantify this "vast" majority and how much is in a vast. 

 

If you are including a poll, include the precise wording of the poll question and the details of the people asked and where the people who were asked were from. 

 

Thank you

Yesteday poll results. See if you can locate Google!

3 hours ago, mogandave said:

Most everyone speaks with both sides of their mouth.

 

Did you mean to say he speaks out of both sides of his mouth?

 

In any event, I don’t what’s wrong with wanting to testify but deciding not to testify. 
 

Somehow you missed the point. Not my job to help out with COMMON sense.

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. That's what the courts exist for. If the Dems were too keen to reach the magic "impeachment" to go through the courts that's down to them. That they think the senate will continue the charade that benefits only the Dems is laughable, IMO.

Nothing to fear.

What part of the timing to get the SCOUS tiing is so diffucut to understand. Point in question the repease of his taxes is schudled for April I recall. Waiting for these issues to get court judgement is no timely possible!

5 minutes ago, Tulak said:

You may be right Jingthing, it seems you have much better understanding of US system than I do.

Perhaps you can answer if it is true that at the end of the last year (still before the Impeachment) the President wanted to testify, but his testimony was refused. I vaguely remember this piece of news.

If this is truth, it doesn't make much sense.

You do sound uninformed and confused. Before impeachment he did say that he wanted to testify then reversed that. His MO is to say both and has no worry his CULT will support. In America we call that " speaking with both sides of your mouth". He denies, then deflects then says I did it so what! 

22 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Evidence? Documents? Witnesses? Why on earth would we want a fair trial?

 

I believe the senate and the GOP are going to pay a very heavy price for their nonsense, and their unwillingness to at least hear the evidence, come November. I think we will be looking at a democratically controlled senate, house, and executive branch this time around. And the GOP deserves that trouncing. The people are tired of the nonsense.

Facts are that your wrong. Americans want witness and documentation by a  68% margin and 48% Republicans do as well.

BB deposited my SSA to my account yesterday and I get my check in US fourth Wednesday of each month. Last September my depsit was sent to Remmitance BBNY needing me to provide my home here address. Since then back to routine deposits.

10 hours ago, nightbird said:

Mrwebb,

 

I have a Foreign Currency Deposit account at Krungsri. Because I didn't do any real homework before opening it, I discovered the exchange rate to THB is lower than some of the other banks like SCB and Bangkok Bank. If you do decide to open an FCD and use it for your annual retirement visa or extension of stay, it has to come from outside of Thailand to satisfy Immigration rules. I cannot remember the minimum amount for opening an account but it is not that much. In order to open it, you must deposit some money into it. 

 

If I were to do this all over again, I would use a bank like Transferwise, keep my US$ or other currencies in it, and make the transfer to a Thai bank whenever I needed to replenish THB. You would get mid market exchange rates which you could not get in Thailand using an FCD. Over time, this adds up.

500 baht to open NYBB

On 1/17/2020 at 12:47 PM, earlinclaifornia said:

trump was a Democrat until 2015!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/16/donald-trump-changed-political-parties-at-least-fi/

On 1/16/2020 at 6:38 PM, earlinclaifornia said:

Devin Nunes was the one person I always wanted to get. Done!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/lev-parnas-devin-nunes-involved-035900428.html

 Can't wait to hear from: Cryingdick, thaibeachlovers, elmrfudd, JHolmesJr, atyclb and Kelsall

Especially dundee48 but he has no COURAGE to respond by posting but laughs his ass off. Last laugh is on you.

Nunes for trumps cell mate:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democratic-rep-responds-to-devin-nunes-threat-of-defamation-lawsuit-take-your-letter-and-shove-it/ar-BBZ4yNk?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=hplocalnews

11 hours ago, sirineou said:

I enthusiastically supported Sanders and contributed to his campaign for the nomination 2016, The only problem I have an issue is with his age. If he got the nomination I would certainly vote for him . In the general I would have to see who is his VP, because IMO he will have a hard time completing two terms. I like Andrew Yang, he hits all the points I have talked about in the past, and understands the new economy. Go to YouTube and listen to his interviews , tell me what you think. 

Anyway the next few months will be interesting and crucial to the future of our country.

I too like Yang for VP. Typically a swing state candidate is chosen.