Hanaguma
-
Posts
6,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Hanaguma
-
Gotta link?
-
Most don't care about the woman's body. They DO care about the separate body that is growing inside of it. As for MYOB, you may not be very aware or experienced, but it does take a man AND a woman to start a pregnancy. So telling the man to butt out is dehumanizing and disempowering of one of the baby's parents.
-
Hey, she was a cute little thing when she was young, did you see the beach shot? Not now though, looks like he dodged a bullet there. Not a news story or "gotcha" IMHO, just happy to see young Tim being a normal pussy hound like the rest of us who came to Asia in the 1980s.
-
Nope, because the citizens of Ohio decided their own law. It is a tragic case for sure but also puts paid to yur claim that states have "abortion bans". Even Ohio does not have a ban, just a restriction based on how far along the pregnancy is. Care to try again and come up with a state that has a total abortion ban?
-
Latest RCP aggregate is Trump up by 0.4% nationally, and 1.0% in the swing states, taking all of them but Michigan, where Harris leads by 0.5% -
He is. But at least he got some nasty when he was teaching in China, lo 30 plus years ago. Makes me like him better, shows he used to be normal.
-
I believe all those states have certain exceptions. Alabama, for example, has exceptions if the mother's life or health are endangered, or if there are fatal problems with the fetus. Nowhere has a 100% ban.
-
I don't believe the Republicans want a national abortion ban. Have any of the reddest states banned abortion yet? There are a few who do, but as a group or a national party, no. Check their platform.
-
Trump has never advocated for a national ban. It is up to the states. It is not part of the Republican platform. Just fearmongering on the part of Democrats, like Michelle Obama beaking off about how women will become "collateral damage" if the Republicans win. Poor Michelle, America has disapponted her again...
-
They do? Then why the hell did they go through such pains to get the Roe v Wade decision overturned, and the power given back to the states? You make no sense, man.
-
Analysis :Harris Speech Eclipses the past 3-1-2 years of get Trump
Hanaguma replied to riclag's topic in Political Soapbox
Exactly. I wish she had spent some time actually discussing the issues. -
I am tellin ya, Joe doesnt want Kamala to win. If she loses, it will burnish Biden's reputation and he can always claim that he would have won IF given the chance. If she wins, his legacy will take a hit. Not to mention that Jill Biden hates Kamala with the energy and brilliance of a thousand suns.
- 85 replies
-
- 20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yep, that is real helpful. Lean into the personal attacks, just like your boss. But please do us a favour-try to be original and/or funny. Reheating the same old tropes gets tiring on the eyes.
-
I hear a lot of people saying that they hate Trump and could never vote for him. Fair enough. But how far does that extend? If the GOP had another nominee, would that change your thinking? I am curious how much hatred of the Bad Orange Man is really driving people to vote Democrat.
-
Well hell, it makes more sense than locking up his friends...
-
Really, it lay dormant for a long time. Then, suddenly last week, when Harris was tanking in the polls, it became a campaign issue. Which it never was with Vance. Who later apologized.
-
Is that what happened? The joke was about the island, not the identity of .... why am I trying to explain a joke? Suffice to say that the problem of waste in Puerto Rico has been in the news, it is well known among informed people. Therefore a valid topic for humour. Democrats are grasping at straws to fake outrage at a joke that a comedian told, rather than grappling with the actual issues that voters care about.
-
Very true. And he probably won't. I think the timeline for the offer has passed. What he DID agree to was a chat with JD Vance. For 3 hours. In his studio in Austin. Tomorrow.
-
Politico is reporting that the Harris team agreed to a chat with Joe Rogan on Tuesday IF: a/ it was only one hour b/ Rogan had to fly to Harris, not Harris going to Rogan's studio You can speculate as to why she was demanding such concessions. https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/29/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/joe-rogan-kamala-harris-interview-conditions-00186008
-
Ordinary folk disagree that the USA is doing well. They think the country is on the wrong track by a 2 to 1 margin. This thread illustrates the usual divide between left and right. I think it is possible for a lot of decent Americans to support Harris. They aren't idiots or deluded or anything like that. Just wrong IMHO. Yet it is so so so hard for those on the left to admit the same about Trump.
-
A white nationalist event? With holocaust survivors, Hindus, Jews, and African Americans all speaking... in support of the man who promoted the Abraham Accords and moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem, and has Jewish grandkids. Sure, "white nationalist". Pull the other one, it has bells on.
-
Why do you assume that PR-Americans have no sense of humour? Or that they are so shallow that an off-colour joke would prompt them to vote against their own family interests? Talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations!
-
Problem with voting data is that it does not indicate the motivation of the voters. They could be new and eager voters for their side, or they could just be voting early to avoid stress on voting day. That is why trends and polls tend to tell a better story, especially when seen over a length of time.
-
Yet more evidence that attractive and intelligent women tend to be right wing.
-
It is a good question. What matters is whether the GOP turnout is new voters who are eager to make their choice, or if they are simply cannibalizing voters who are simply voting early instead of on election day. Remains to be seen. This is why IMHO the polling averages and trends tend to matter more than simple early turnout.