Hanaguma

Yes, well-known behavioral psychologist Larry Sabato..... Trump is crazy, but crazy like a fox. He is a brilliant politician at the retail level, manages the very difficult feat of appearing as an "everyman" in spite of being rather wealthy.

No need to twist your panties so tight. McD's are usually franchises and have some latitude in their actions. Plus, the burden is not on Trump to prove Harris didn't work there. It was Harris who first claimed, without evidence, that she once was a fry cook at the Golden Armpits. Until she can show some evidence, her claim is unproven.

Trump is an entertainer. Sometimes he likes to work a little 'blue', no big deal. All the faux outrage just emphasized the fact that he is winning, and his opponents can't handle it.

"A good deal of his bizarre campaign rally?" OK. Let's look at the numbers. How long was the rally, how much time was spent on Palmer's driver, and does that equate to "a good deal" of time? Your claim, feel free to prove it.

So, THIS is the election strategy that is supposed to drag Kamala across the finish line? Finding various washed up politicians and letting them vent against The Donald? Good luck with that. Swamp creatures like McConnell and Cheney hating on Trump only elevates Trump in the eyes of the voters. I would suggest that instead they try to roll out some specific policy proposals that would actually help working Americans, but I guess that is too much to ask for.

Well, she IS gonna turn 60 in a couple of days. Kind of strange for her to refer to herself as "a new generation of leadership".

I am sure you could provide an example or two of these "very loaded questions". Feel free to check the transcript. I would love to compare it to the 60 Minutes transcript, but for some reason it is unavailable...

I would agree, if he largely kept himself in the background and out of the spotlight. But Slugger Doug has been a large part of the Harris campaign, part of her appeal to male voters. So, as such, he has made himself open to scrutiny and criticism.

On the first topic, immigration, she refused to answer the question. She also refused to answer why her administration reversed all of Trump's EOs about border security. She mentioned a bill that could not pass congress, even though the Dems controlled BOTH houses at that time. Then moved on to this years' border bill, which was DOA. Nothing else of substance. And that was 10 minutes' time of the interview. Her first answer on "turn the page"? "I'm not Donald Trump". Second answer? "My presidency will not be a continuation of Joe Biden's presidency". Well no sh!t darling. How about fleshing those answers out a bit? Then she talks about the last decade. Well, a decade ago, Obama was president. Over the past 16 years, Democrats have been in power for 12. WTF is she maunering on about? Then the disproven shibboleth about "turning the military on the American people". Utter horse hockey. Context matters. He was talking about if there was extensive civil unrest after the election. Not having Marines show up at your backyard BBQ if you are a Harris supporter. Totally disingenuous nonsense from the VP. As soon as Biden's obvious decline is brought up, she does a rapid fire b-b-but Trump, 5 times in 30 seconds. Never talks about her culpability in defenestrating her boss, nor his diminished capacity. Then, about Iran. Baier says that her administration has relaxed sanctions and allowed Iran to enjoy millions in profits. Her answer, and I quote "But let's go back to Donald Trump..." It was a joke. But hopefully enough people watched and could see how shallow and vacuous she is. Not an original thought in her head.

How about this: kill the rest of Hamas, kick out UNRWA, make sure that any aid given is supervised by reputable NGOs and is not used for weapons or terror infrastructure.

I would LOVE to engage with what she actually said, if she actually said anything of substance. Most was boilerplate pablum. Mentioning the other candidate once a minute instead of using that time to introduce a new audience to her own policy proposals was weak.

The Cardinal was probably laughing the hardest! Priests can be rather earthy.

In a shocking twist, it was revealed that the girl was real, but that the Elon Musk was actually a robot built in his image.

Yeah, he was on fire. His shots at Schumer and Walz were pretty harsh! Not to mention the "white guys for Harris"...

I have a feeling that the Bidens are secretly hoping for a Harris loss. What better vindication for Joe than for Kamala to lose? He can say, "look man, if I were the candidate we woulda won!". But if Harris wins that makes replacing Joe look like brilliant strategy.

So, did you actuallly read the transcript I provided? And check whether or not your six assertions were valid or merely the fevered dreams of a member of Team Harris.

Yep, this time it is true. The Labour Party in the UK is sending one hundred staffers to the US to canvas for Kamala Harris. I thought this was illegal? And why do the Democrats allow it? https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/british-labour-party-sending-staff-to-campaign-for-harris-in-us-swing-states-united-kingdom-uk-left-leaning-kamala-harris-2024-election-democratic-party-north-carolina-pennsylvania

1. She discussed. Didn't actually detail. 2. I was wrong. She mentioned Trump 24 times. Check the transcript. https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kamala-harris-interview-on-fox-news 3. 21:30 mark in the interview. Baier asks about Biden. Harris deflects by saying that Biden is not on the ballot, then deflects again to Trump. Never answers about Biden's mental decline. 4. At 16:00 minutes Baier asks about "turning the page". Harris goes straight to "turn the page from Donald Trump's rhetoric". Baier says she has been in office nearly 4 years, she again deflects to Trump. 5. Twenty four times. 6. First question was "how many illegals have crossed?" She never gave a number, never answered. She deflects to the usual pablum of "we have a broken immigration system....." and ignores the follow up about why her administration immediately reversed all of Trump's executive orders on border security. Anything else?

According to RCP, Harris' lead nationally is down to 1.5%. Trump is leading, albeit narrowly, in all 7 swing states. Many key senate races are also tightening. Betting markets have Trump favoured 57% to 41%.

Like any government organization, UNRWA wants to stay alive. If they actually were to fulfil their mission and see the Palestinians all resettled, then there would be no need for UNRWA. They would all lose their cushy jobs and bloated paychecks, and have to actually work for a living. The Palestinian population has exploded in recend decades, much to the delight of UNRWA. Gives them reason to demand more money and the ability to hire more of their cronies.

It would have been nice if Kamala had actually stated any policy in the interview. Instead, she mentioned Trump more than 20 times. Even when asked about Biden's mental state and when she knew he was slipping, her answer was "Trump.....". When asked how she can 'turn the page' when she is number 2 in the current administration, her answer was "Trump....". I was actually hoping to hear some policy from her. SHe had the chance to reach an audience that doesn't get to see her very much and generate some good publicity. Instead, she fell back on "let me be clear..." and "I will follow the law" and "b-b-but Trump". From the very first question about immigration when she couldn't give a simple answer to a simple question, she was evasive and shallow.

Debatable, but ultimately irrelevant. There is nowhere else on earth that refugee status has become something passed from generation to generation. After WW2, there were countless movements of populations, borders shifting, countries being made, etc. Germans were expelled from East Prussia to give that land to Poland. Should THEY be allowed to return and reclaim their homes? Millions were displaced when India divided into India and East/West Pakistan. Hindus moved to India, Muslims to the Pakistans. Should they be allowed to now go back? Unfortunately, the Palestinians were fed a steady diet of false promises from their 'brother' Arabs. "Just wait a bit, once we kill all the Jews you can go back and gain the riches they leave behind". So they were never truly resettled in other places. Just kept in limbo as successive invasions and genocide attempts against Israel failed, from 1948 to now. So now they are where they are. We have 4th generation refugees who are STILL rejected by their ethnic and religious bretheren.

Yes, they take their clues from their Dear Leader. The answer to any tough question is, "b-b-but Trump".

Under normal circumstances, yes. But in an intense interview it is sometimes incumbent on the interviewer to steer the interviewee back to the question. The Bloomberg interviewer did the same to Trump, and it is not impolite when done right. Baier was also operating under a very significant time constraint. Harris started more than 15 minutes late and refused to extend the interview to make up for it. So basically, he was limited to only half the time that he had prepared for. This made it imperative to be a bit harsh on the wordy answers and drill down to the essentials.

In other words, no. Baier is polite and respectful, even when he is doing a tough interview. It is his style. He called the VP "Ma'am" for that reason. He respects both VP Harris and the office she represents. If he interviewed Biden, he would call him "sir" or "Mr. President". Is that simple courtesy hard to comprehend?