Hanaguma

Any examples of a "well articulated and tough rebuttal" you would care to share?

I can just hear Joe Scarberia tomorrow morning. "Wow, Kamala was great. This was the best Kamala Harris I have ever seen!"

True. Except that he ran a 20,000 plus employee corporation for decades. Still flies around in his private jet. Lives at his private golf resort. Oh, and ran the US for 4 years fairly well. What has Kamala ever managed or accomplished in the private sector?

Here are before and after shots of Kamala before and after the interview;

You have a short memory. It was yesterday that the head of...Bloomberg?... had a much longer and intense interview with Trump in Chicago. Lots of tough questions, Trump tried bobbing and weaving at times, it was good journalism. Now, here. Kamala shows up late, looks like a deer in the headlights most of the time, runs away as soon as she can. She was invited to do Bloomberg as well, and declined.

So... She shows up 15 minutes late, leaves in a rush, tries to filibuster every answer and pivot to b-b-but Trump!. America, this is one of your choices for leader. Choose wisely.

More debunked rubbish. The townhall was stopped due to two medical emergencies. Instead of relying on the usual claptrap leftoid propaganda you ingest, try looking at a reputable organization. If Donnie is the chicken, why did it take Kamala 55 DAYS to sit down for an interview, and even then with her support White Man needed at her side? Trump is far more active and available. As is Vance. Walz is being kept in a closet as much as possible, especially after his "hunting" fiasco.

I prefer to see it as a 'tribute'. If it is good enough for the Speaker, it is good enough for the plebs here.

Yes, I admit to following the Biden/Harris technique of plagiarising those I want to.

Glad to see you are taking the time to enjoy the Speaker's skills in dealing with the biased legacy media!

Jesus no. The Sikh are causing enough trouble as it is back home. Enough stress between Canada and India now as it is.

Let's go back to talking about Israel, where we can agree!

I feel like I am from the future...as I typed my question I had the strange feeling that this would be your answer. Thanks for being predictable!

Sure. And calling someone the "tool of an anti democratic oligarch" is what, exactly?

This is one of those cheap political tricks that are sadly becoming more and more common. I understand that attendees should be security checked and screened before going in the room with a candidate, but the idea of staging it as a theatrical production is embarrassing.

Possibly. But it won't be me. If Harris wins, I think it's bad for the US and bad for the world, but I won't be 'bitterly disappointed'. Life goes on. Plus, by that time Canada will have elected a good Conservative Prime Minister, so ya take the good with the bad.

Sheer jealousy. Just because you're not packing the gear to interest a giant like Peter Thiel.

There ya go! The two sides can come together. Right now. Over beer.

You seem to forget that people already figure he is a conman and a tax cheat. And it just doesn't matter to most voters. If you worry about dementia, compare Trump's schedule this campaign to his opponents. He is out, talking every day, being very entertaining, and is a very funny guy.

You forgot the /s after your last sentence. When ABC doesn't have a problem, it is game over. They are not Trump fans.

You sound bitter and jealous. He is the best of the 4 left in the running, no question. Unlike his opponents, he at least had a career outside of politics.

This was a townhall, a much smaller audience and a more intimate setting. Anyway, take it up with the legacy media. You don't have to believe me.

Been there, done that. Nobody cares but desperate Democrats. Voters care about the issues- especially the economy, immigration, and inflation. Not the president's cholesterol.

The trend is what is important, not the raw numbers. THe Democrats are terrified that African Americans are wandering off the plantation and discovering that GOP policies, especially economics and immigration, are good for them. Plus they hate the shallow pandering that they are now getting from Harris and Obama.

Trump debated twice, on hostile networks both times. Would do 60 Minutes if they apologized for the sleaze job done on him the previous campaign- they refused. The rest is all fluff that the public doesn't care about. They DO care about the economy and inflation and immigration. All issues the GOP has a clear lead. Plus wanting a change, which the standard bearer of the current Administration admittedly does not provide.