Bkk Brian

The IDF and Hamas operate on the same level of inhumanity. Hamas apologist through and through Mojo

B’Tselem – Less Reliability and Credibility, More Politics B’Tselem’s flawed reporting is relied-upon by Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) organizations for their anti-Israel campaigns. In one of B’Tzelem’s recent publications entitled “Israel in the West Bank: 47 Years of Temporary Occupation,”3 this mélange of flawed factual and legal analysis, as well as partisan political prognostications and criticism, are particularly evident, undermining any purported claim to reliability by B’Tselem. B’Tselem acknowledges on the one hand that the term “occupation” is a legal term describing the status of a territory seized in armed conflict and not being part of the occupier’s own sovereign territory, pending diplomatic agreement determining the status of the territory. However, on the other hand, B’Tselem goes on to make unsubstantiated and reckless political value-judgments that Israel “apparently considers the West Bank, and particularly Area C, as its own, a part of its sovereign territory,” and that “one of its policy objectives is to drive Palestinians out of Area C, at least in part to facilitate its future annexation to Israel.” https://jcpa.org/article/btselem-less-reliability-credibility/

these ones? The videos were captured in 'head-cam' cameras before the Kfar Aza attack and exposed how boy soldiers are being trained by Hamas commanders as the next generation of terrorists. https://www.wionews.com/world/are-hamas-resorted-to-training-kids-to-defend-gaza-reports-suggests-so-647418

Indeed. Hamas has been committing war crimes for years fireing rockets into Israel.

Professor Holmes and just about every doctor and scientist in the world don't agree with you. But you have around 14 or 15 mates who know the truth................

Because nothing justifies the Oct 7th attack's, once you realize that you can move on instead of living in the past

Such is nature even before the white coats: “We have discovered that most groups of viruses that infect vertebrates – including humans, such as those that cause well-known diseases like influenza – are in fact derived from those present in invertebrates,” said Professor Holmes, who is also based at the University’s multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre. The study suggests these viruses have been associated with invertebrates for potentially billions of years, rather than millions of years as had been believed, and that invertebrates are the true hosts for many types of virus. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2016/11/24/world-of-viruses-uncovered-in-nature.html

What facts would those be then?

You are easily amused.........

You'd think Hamas would have released the hostages to put an end to it eh

The same Al Jazeera who posted an article alleging that the Israeli government had opened dams in its southern region to intentionally flood parts of the Gaza Strip a few years ago? Hint, there were no dams in southern Israel and the article was false.

How does nature cope with Aids/HIV that started in monkeys/chimps then jumped to humans, or in nature should humans avoid all contact with monkeys? The same could be said of all zoonotic diseases including Ebola, and avian influenza

This is a public forum and you have posted, I am replying: TASS A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/russian-news-agency-tass/ Sputnik A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sputnik-news/ RT News A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/

I think this choice is at the discretion of the moderators of AN and I don't know where it's written or communicated that these Russian media outlets are forbidden. No its in the forum rules. Credible links only. RT, Sputnik, Tass are not credible and known for promoting conspiracy theories, false information and are a questionable source.

lol, more deflection from the Hamas apologist who prefers to call them freedom fighters

Please link to where these terrorists have suddenly become freedom fighters via international law. "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source."

Who you prefer top call freedom fighters and not terrorists. Fitting that you do that along with your Russian preferences to media

Your buddies

You provided no direct link troll..............and Hamas military wing are terrorists not gov

IDF twitter is not reliable to Hamas supporters only troll. Its a gov media outlet and allowed on this forum

Here we go again........................ 18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However in factual areas such as but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency

Your cases are never closed. I just confirmed 1,400 were killed, the list of civilian and IDF is continually being updated as they still need to identify the body pieces. The link quite clearly states that. You are trolling yet again.

Try again, update 3rd Nov More than 1,400 Israelis were killed, with at least 729 of them civilians – those confirmed dead and cleared for publication – according to information available on the news-site Haaretz. This data is being updated and almost certainly will mean the final public list of civilian dead is higher. https://aoav.org.uk/2023/the-names-of-729-of-the-hundreds-of-civilians-killed-by-hamas-the-names-released-so-far/

Behind a paywall and published 19th Oct, that's not a credible link to the latest figures and you know it

Are you sure this 1.400 figure is correct? Yes its correct and includes IDF killed, please provide a credible link to disprove it