mikeymike100

In some cities in the UK it already has!

Why are they, the Government, going out of their way to protect only 'muslims' surely this reverse discrimination. " The report, adopted by the Labour Party, defined Islamophobia as “rooted in racism” and described it as “a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness." Totally ludicrous, Islam or Muslimness is not a 'race', how can it be racism????

Correct, surely it is obvious to everyone that things will only get worse unless this madness of allowing so called 'asylum seekers' into the country is stopped.

It says he was deported before, but it doesn't say anything about why or was he banned from reentering Thailand?

So do they face more scrutiny entering or leaving Thailand? The problem seems to be these idiots attempting to leave Thailand with their bags full of weed? Surely they could employ sniffer dogs to combat this lunacy?

"She also reassured parents that the school is considering alternative ways to mark the season in the future in a way that reflects the cultural diversity of the community. Additionally, she noted that the school would be celebrating Refugee Week in June." So Easter is canceled and they are going to celebrate 'refugee week', now that speaks volumes about how things are going down hill in the UK!

" "She further argued that using the term "transgender woman" still misleads the public, as "lots of people don’t know that a ‘transgender woman’ is not a woman at all, but a man who merely identifies as a woman." Calling the police’s wording "ideologically motivated nonsense," she warned that it undermines public trust and makes it harder for law enforcement to do their job." The above sentence describes the problem exactly!

One of the reasons why Trump won so convincingly was Biden/Harris and their policies.

Stephen Miller, explains...... Stephen Miller serves as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor

" Their collective vision is not just to enjoy the festivities but to reduce alcohol-related accidents traditionally associated with Songkran celebrations across Thailand." Reducing accidents, alcohol related or not, is a good thing, but many tourists go to Songkran for the alcohol, so I cant see this being popular, or actually working!

Exactly, unless the Indians are pussies??? Pun intended!

Well good point, you would think that fact would be very pertinent? But some members will no doubt say that is being racist??😂

"Stop complaining. Their country, their rules. If you don’t like it, then leave." Where was I complaining, where did I say I don't like it? I was stating FACTS obviously you need 👓

I agree, the problem is that muslim families teach their children about Islam at a very early age, they get indoctrinated and its a vicious circle. I am currently in Jakarta, Indonesia, which is the largest, by population, muslim country in the world and children are practicing the 'call to prayer' you can hear them on the speakers. Muslims have on average more children than non muslims, so it wont be too long before the UK is lost forever!

" Muslims, like all citizens, are covered by existing anti-discrimination and hate crime law" Why are the UK government trying to push this ludicrous initiative? It would mean only Islam would have 'privileged class' protection? It stink to high heaven!

"Southwark Crown Court heard that Ebid reached the UK in October 2022 via a small boat crossing. Within days of his arrival, from a home provided to him in Isleworth, west London" So this illegal arrives on a small boat is given free accommodation and other stuff no doubt, then immediately decides to start a lucrative illegal business? Nothing like cutting of the hands that feeds you? Maybe they should cut his hand off, like they would do where he is from and teach him a lesson. In the UK if found guilty, he will probably get community service as he a non white foreigener?

So another 'profession' only allowed for Thais? A few days ago the RTP were rounding up foreign prostitutes posted on AN

I could be wrong, but that sounds like sarcasm?

Totally agree, but who is to say who is obese?The only real way would be for airlines to set and average weight for Male and Female and then set out in its term and conditions if you are over by say 20% say, you need to pay for 2 seats. This would involve people being weighed at check in, like bags. I can see some folks not liking this idea!

You can go to any beer bar and see and smell usually someone using a 'vape'/electronic cigarette, Out in the open and nobody seemingly cares. Essentially there is evidence to suggest vaping is less dangerous than the real thing. Compared directly, vaping exposes you to fewer and lower levels of harmful substances than smoking, making it a less damaging option for adults looking to switch. The NHS and CDC acknowledge it can help smokers quit, which is a net health win if it replaces cigarettes entirely. But if you’re not already a smoker, starting to vape isn’t “healthy”—it’s just less bad than picking up a pack of Marlboros. The best health move is avoiding both. You can legally buy cigarettes, but not E-cigarettes?? How odd!

You absolutely correct, it makes sense since airlines charge for excess baggage, cos the aircraft burns more fuel, cos of the extra weight, same should go for obese people. Anyone over a certain weight should have to pay extra!

"As trans and non-binary people increasingly require access to midwifery services, this paper proposes an alternative professional title that is inclusive and liberates midwives from continuously reinscribing the sex/gender binary in their nomenclature,” they write." Total madness, the UK is cooked! —due to its focus on pregnancy and childbirth, traditionally seen as female domains—there’s no legal or professional barrier preventing men from becoming midwives in most places today. The term "midwife" itself, from Old English "mid" (with) and "wif" (woman), refers to the role of being "with the woman" during birth, not the gender of the practitioner.

He is visibly <deleted> scared of saying anything about them, speaks volumes!

"Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, has criticized the guide, calling it a sign of a politically influenced judiciary. “This guidance is another concerning example of the politicisation of the judiciary. Sentencing decisions should be made on the facts of the case, not on activist guidelines which are pro-open borders. Illegal migrants and asylum seekers who break the law should not be treated any less robustly than a British citizen, otherwise we have a two-tier system.” Jenrick is absolutely correct, everyone should be treated by the judiciary equally, irrespective of demographics or religion!

Maybe it depends on if they have to pay tax in Thailand?