dinsdale

As long as you didn't mind losing your job for some. Proof of vaccination to fly. Demonisation if your weren't getting vaccinated. I guess it's sort of freedom of choice.

Thailand: 10 million sought treatment for pollution-related illnesses in 2023 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68487230 Rather more than covid I reckon. p.s. no such thing as spring in the tropics.

You have taken what @stoner posted completely out of context. Indeed it's a total misrepresentation.

Not all companies have governments and mass media advertising their product and not only advertising but demonising those who don't want the product and even forcing people to take the product. If anything this sounds more along communist or authoritarian lines.

Common sense. Stop it.

Yep I'm coming from a position of not blindly following what big pharma, the CDC, governments, WHO and the access media tells me to believe. I'm glad I have this ability and sad that so many don't. The OP is alarmist nonsense that gets rolled out every now and again.

Push, push , push the narrative. 2020 LOL.

This is all Thaksin. Simple as that.

The thing about studies into this is and has been from the beginning who pays for them.

I'm not that younger with a comorbidity. The 2 times I've had covid were not as bad as the couple of times I got the flu when I was younger. Bit like a heavy cold and I'm guessing most of us have had our fair share of them. As for a mask it's been well over two years. Jabs? No thanks.

The thing with this virus is it's very, very good at spreading itself around. A person can be infected and not even know they it or have symptoms that are so mild that it's hardly noticed. Still able to spread the virus though. It's unstoppable just like the common cold and is with us for the foreseeable future. Jabs, masks, lockdowns whatever, it can't be stopped. Lost count of how many Omicron variants there have been and it's certain there'll be many more all of which for the overwhelmelming majority of poeople is a non-severe viral infection.

Ah! Nice to see the old anti-vaxer rhetoric raise it's ugly head again. That was a big part of the get vaccinated or you're no good campaign. Not wanting to take the covid 'vaccine' does not make a person an anti-vaxer. Tetanus. I'll have and have had the jab. Rabbies. I'll have and have had the jabs. As for kids they should get their course of jabs apart from the mRNA jabs. I though will never have another mRNA jab for what is essentially a non-serious virul infection for the overwhelming % of the World's population from technology that has had no long term independent studies and has been shown to be able to cause serious side effects including death. Ok it might be rare by I'll never risk it again. I have no reason to.

Rediculous anology. Not wearing a sealtbelt is in no way comparable to a contagious virus be it a seroius or non-serious virus.

Still transmit, still get sick and can still die. Obviously comorditities increase the risk of serious illness or death vaccinated or not.

Like big pharma got an indemnity for vaccine injuries/death? You seemed to have missed the very important FACT that being vaccinated does NOT stop transmission. Should vaccinated people have to sign the same indemnity? So everyone basically.

Many 'esteemed experts' said that vaccines are safe and will stop transmission. Remember "Get vaccinated to save granny"?

Incredulous is more like it. What has become a burgeoning private sector enterprise will now go back to into the hands of organised crime. Money for the cartels, generals and the BIB. If you think this is a positive move then that's your opinion which you are entitled to.

It seems you have missed my point completely.

One has to wonder why recovery times are longer? Is it the virus or the vaccines This entire article reads like it's going to go pandemic again. Who on here thinks this to be the case? I also see the modal verbs of could and may being used. ps. Won't be long now until the narrative supported by narrative stats are posted.

I want to drink alcohol, I want to smoke cigs and I want to 'legally' smoke dope. The 1st two I can do and cause more harm to my body than the 3rd. The 1st two are legal and the 3rd is about to be reclassified as a class 5 narcotic the same as meth and heroin. Simply insane.

So a Bt1499 (or less) bottle of wine which was going to have taxes cut and which hasn't happened will now have an extra 7% added on.

It was down for 50 minutes. This is why a cashless society is not a good idea. No internet then no internet transactions. I wonder how many were at a checkout and ooops, no internet and no cash to pay for the goods.

It's about recriminalising dope. It's about making it a class 5 narcotic again. Mature arguments about this includes a range of issues. Pity you can't see this.

Dope, yaba, alcohol and cigs are all drugs. No apples and pears as you say. All drugs and all available. Now list them most harmful to least harmful. Now think about why is dope going to be reclassified as a narcotic. Now think about the article and should dope be recriminalised. It's called critical thinking. Not everyone is good at this.

My apologies. I didn't reaslise you only read the headlines and/or can't understand the wider issues and arguments. Apart from this it seems as though the moderators have no problem with this line of discussion.